MLB: What to watch on June 5, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Boston Red Sox @ New York Yankees, 4:05p
Summary
High-stakes-looking matchup on paper: this is today's top gNERD (14.06), driven by a punchy Yankees lineup and a high-pNERD Ryan Weathers against a veteran Sonny Gray who brings steadiness but fewer fireworks. MLB previews show Weathers as a true rising-volatility arm for New York while Gray has been a useful, recently reinstated veteran for Boston.
The numbers explain the watchability: New York’s tNERD (8.90) is juiced by elite barrel rate and gaudy batting runs, so there’s home-run upside every time Weathers misses a spot, and his pNERD (8.63) reflects a sub-80 xFIP- and mid-90s velo that projects swing-and-miss upside. Boston’s tNERD (7.25) is more about defense, bullpen depth, and a big positive luck number (+19) suggesting they’ve underperformed their underlying skills and could bounce back. Sonny Gray’s pNERD (3.33) flags average xFIP and a slower pace; he stabilizes games more than he dominates. Given those contrasts—power-heavy Yankees lineup vs. a dependable but less-violent Gray—this should be a watchable clash for fans who like meaningful matchups between a high-leverage offense and a pitcher who forces contact.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -19.7 | 7.1% | 2.7 | 18.6 | 20.9 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 19.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.83 | -0.78 | 0.85 | 1.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 1.28 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.83 | -0.78 | 0.85 | 1.71 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 7.25 |
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 37.6 | 10.6% | 2.3 | 3.2 | 17.1 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -5.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.66 | 1.89 | 0.71 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.33 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.66 | 1.89 | 0.71 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 8.90 |
Sonny Gray, Boston Red Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 91 | 9.4% | 62.8% | 92.1 mph | 36 | 21.0s | -20 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.43 | -0.55 | -0.38 | -0.98 | 1.91 | 1.72 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.86 | -0.27 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.33 |
Ryan Weathers, New York Yankees
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 74 | 11.4% | 64.4% | 95.0 mph | 26 | 18.9s | 11 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.41 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.40 | -0.76 | -0.01 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.82 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.63 |
Chicago White Sox @ Philadelphia Phillies, 3:40p
Summary
Watch this if you want a clear contrast: Jesús Luzardo is pitching like an ace and the White Sox lineup is one of the more fun young offenses in baseball, so the game hinges on whether Luzardo keeps it stingy or the Sox exploit Anthony Kay’s thin peripherals. The 12.79 gNERD rates above today's mean and historic 75th percentile, driven by a high tNERD for Chicago (8.80) and a hulking pNERD for Luzardo (11.09), while Kay’s pNERD (0.47) suggests his profile offers few sustainable advantages.
Luzardo’s recent stretch — a far better run of starts after early-season trouble — plus his strong xFIP and strikeout profile are the main watchability hooks. The White Sox have been a genuine surprise with momentum into June, which amplifies interest whenever they face a premium arm. Conversely, the Phillies’ lineup has been underperforming and represents a real reason to doubt a high-scoring contest absent defensive miscues or homer regression. If Luzardo is on, this is a high-quality-pitching tilt; if not, the Sox’ offense (and Kay’s shaky strike numbers) makes this a watchable mismatch.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 15.8 | 9.4% | -0.2 | 0.3 | 14.0 | $105.8M | 27.1 | 1.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.18 | -0.05 | 0.20 | -1.11 | -1.76 | 0.07 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.18 | -0.05 | 0.20 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.80 |
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.1 | 7.8% | 3.7 | -1.4 | 25.1 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -1.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.32 | -0.24 | 1.20 | -0.21 | 0.96 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.06 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.32 | -0.24 | 1.20 | -0.21 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 5.22 |
Anthony Kay, Chicago White Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 120 | 8.6% | 61.4% | 95.4 mph | 31 | 20.1s | -30 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.25 | -0.90 | -0.96 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.50 | -0.45 | -0.48 | 0.59 | 0.00 | -0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.47 |
Jesús Luzardo, Philadelphia Phillies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 69 | 13.8% | 64.0% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 17.3s | 35 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.70 | 1.39 | 0.10 | 1.25 | -0.23 | -1.32 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 3.40 | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1.25 | 0.23 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 11.09 |
Los Angeles Angels @ Los Angeles Dodgers, 7:10p
Summary
Worth watching because the Dodgers bring a very lopsided toolbox and Roki Sasaki is the kind of pitcher whose flaws and flashes both make for suspense; the Angels are a muddled but suddenly loud offense with a shaky roster behind it. The gNERD of 11.65 sits above today's average (10.19) and just a hair above the historical median, driven almost entirely by a huge Dodgers tNERD (10.79) and a strong Sasaki pNERD (7.02), while the Angels' team nerd (0.48) and an unknown Angels starter (pNERD 0.00) pull the game back toward one-sidedness.
Sasaki's profile — high velocity and a meaningful positive luck component despite an xFIP- a touch over average — makes him a high-variance watch: he can overpower hitters but also yield contact that turns into offense, which is interesting when paired with the Dodgers' league-leading batting profile. The Angels have been hot at the plate recently (Fox reports 37 runs in a five-game surge) but carry glaring negatives in fielding and bullpen that the NERD components flag as real risks. In short: tune in if you like the feel of a dominant home club and spot-start drama with a star arm; skip it if you want a balanced, toss-up pitching duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.3 | 9.7% | -5.4 | -18.8 | -8.2 | $191.6M | 28.6 | 1.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.29 | 1.20 | -2.01 | -1.88 | -1.32 | -0.13 | -0.39 | 0.07 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.29 | 1.20 | -2.01 | -1.88 | -1.32 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 0.48 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 59.6 | 9.9% | -1.9 | 19.5 | 25.7 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 9.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.62 | 1.36 | -0.78 | 1.80 | 1.00 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.62 | 1.36 | -0.78 | 1.80 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.79 |
Roki Sasaki, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 12.9% | 63.6% | 97.2 mph | 24 | 19.2s | 11 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.21 | 0.99 | -0.05 | 1.44 | -1.29 | 0.24 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.42 | 0.50 | -0.03 | 1.44 | 1.29 | -0.12 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.02 |
Pittsburgh Pirates @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
This is a watchable tilt because the offenses are the story: both teams boast strong tNERDs and the game gNERD (11.38) sits above the historical and today’s means, so expect more action than your average mound duel. Mitch Keller vs. Martín Pérez reads like contact-oriented baseball — neither starter has elite pNERD juice, both post low swinging‑strike profiles, so balls in play and lineup quality will decide this one rather than strikeout dominance.
The numbers back that: Pittsburgh and Atlanta carry hefty team run and barrel marks (Pirates tNERD 7.37, Braves 7.82), so a few well‑placed fly balls could flip the game quickly. Keller has been an up‑and‑down but innings‑eating righty this season, while Pérez has been stingier by results — those season lines show the matchup’s real contrast. Because pNERDs for both starters are modest (3.94 and 3.63), this tilts watchability toward lineup intrigue and bullpen usage: if either team forced early relief work, the game opens up fast. In short: tune in for offense, strategic bullpen decisions, and the possibility of a lively, back‑and‑forth game rather than a low‑K pitchers’ duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Atlanta Braves (2.36); radio, Atlanta Braves (2.36)
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 26.5 | 8.2% | 5.6 | -7.7 | 9.9 | $119.1M | 28.8 | -3.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.18 | 0.06 | 1.87 | -0.81 | -0.08 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.19 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.18 | 0.06 | 1.87 | -0.81 | -0.08 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.37 |
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 31.6 | 9.6% | -0.1 | 7.3 | 22.9 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -18.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.40 | 1.13 | -0.14 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -1.20 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.40 | 1.13 | -0.14 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.82 |
Mitch Keller, Pittsburgh Pirates
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 99 | 8.9% | 64.4% | 93.1 mph | 30 | 18.4s | 5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.03 | -0.77 | 0.26 | -0.50 | 0.31 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.07 | -0.38 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.94 |
Martín Pérez, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 97 | 8.6% | 62.5% | 90.0 mph | 35 | 18.0s | -29 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.08 | -0.90 | -0.51 | -1.98 | 1.64 | -0.74 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.16 | -0.45 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.63 |
Tampa Bay Rays @ Miami Marlins, 4:10p
Summary
Worth tuning in if you like watching a high-end starter dominate and a guessing game at the other end: Rasmussen’s strong pNERD and underlying metrics make this more than a routine afternoon, while Ryan Gusto’s lack of track record turns the Marlins’ side into a low-information wildcard. Rasmussen’s profile (strong xFIP-, excellent velocity and strike rate reflected in a 7.56 pNERD) suggests he’ll give the Rays their best chance to control the game, and his season peripherals back that up. The Marlins’ team NERD is carrying this matchup — their high baserunning value and surprisingly useful bullpen lift their tNERD much higher than Tampa Bay’s, whose weak barrel rate and negative bullpen/fielding components drag their team score down (Rays tNERD 2.50, Marlins 7.47). Rasmussen-versus-an-unknown creates clear viewing narratives: will Rasmussen breeze through a young/spot-starting lineup, or will the Marlins’ small-ball and bullpen torque produce a messy, entertaining game? Gusto’s pNERD of 0 signals very limited data, so expect volatility and roster-move intrigue from Miami. Overall gNERD 11.26 sits above today’s average and makes this a moderately high-priority watch.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Tampa Bay Rays (2.27); radio, Tampa Bay Rays (2.10)
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 5.8 | 5.3% | 2.5 | -6.4 | -1.9 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 1.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.28 | -2.15 | 0.78 | -0.69 | -0.89 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.28 | -2.15 | 0.78 | -0.69 | -0.89 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.50 |
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -6.4 | 6.4% | 5.3 | -2.1 | 16.8 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 4.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.25 | -1.31 | 1.77 | -0.28 | 0.39 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 0.27 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.25 | -1.31 | 1.77 | -0.28 | 0.39 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.47 |
Drew Rasmussen, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 77 | 10.4% | 65.1% | 95.9 mph | 30 | 18.7s | 3 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.24 | -0.11 | 0.55 | 0.83 | 0.31 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.48 | -0.05 | 0.27 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.56 |
Ryan Gusto, Miami Marlins
No detailed stats available
Cleveland Guardians @ Texas Rangers, 5:15p
Summary
If you want a clinic from a young lefty, this is the game to watch: Parker Messick is the main attraction. If you prefer drama, Kumar Rocker supplies the uncertainty — talented arm, low pNERD, mixed peripherals. The gNERD of 11.13 sits a touch above today’s mean and the historical median, so this is mildly above-average watchability driven more by the pitching ledger than fireworks. Messick’s 8.25 pNERD is buoyed by a strong xFIP- (78), sprightly pace and youth, and his season-long road form has been one of the quieter breakout stories of the year. Rocker’s 2.30 pNERD reflects worse underlying numbers (xFIP- ~108, lower strike rate and a much slower pace), which makes him a volatile counterpoint rather than a co-headliner. Cleveland’s higher tNERD (7.36) — helped by youth, bullpen and radio ratings — suggests the Guardians are the more interesting team profile, while Texas offers the risk/reward hook. Short version: tune in for Messick; Rocker keeps it watchable by accident rather than design.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Cleveland Guardians (2.16); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -9.3 | 6.2% | 1.0 | 1.8 | 26.7 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 5.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.38 | -1.46 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 1.07 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.34 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.38 | -1.46 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 1.07 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 7.36 |
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -8.0 | 7.8% | -0.2 | 1.9 | 14.5 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 11.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.32 | -0.24 | -0.18 | 0.11 | 0.23 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.74 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.32 | -0.24 | -0.18 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.35 |
Parker Messick, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 78 | 11.9% | 63.4% | 93.2 mph | 25 | 16.8s | -24 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.18 | 0.55 | -0.16 | -0.46 | -1.03 | -1.73 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.36 | 0.28 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.25 |
Kumar Rocker, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 10.1% | 61.3% | 94.3 mph | 26 | 20.4s | -22 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -0.24 | -0.98 | 0.07 | -0.76 | 1.22 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.11 | -0.12 | -0.49 | 0.07 | 0.76 | -0.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.30 |
New York Mets @ San Diego Padres, 6:40p
Summary
Worth a look but not must-see: the pitchers offer modest intrigue while the Padres’ team profile and broadcast draw most of the watchability. Christian Scott’s season has a new pitch-mix storyline that makes his starts more interesting than his tidy pNERD suggests, and Michael King has been a steady desk-chair ace for San Diego this year — neither profile screams fireworks, which aligns with both pitchers’ mid-3 pNERD marks.
The gNERD (10.66) sits almost exactly at the daily mean, so this game’s entertainment value is driven more by team factors than a high-strikeout duel: the Padres’ tNERD is notably elevated (8.18) thanks to strong defensive and bullpen components, while the Mets’ tNERD is middling (5.45), with their broadcasters making the game easier to watch regardless. The matchup feels like a tidy, TV-friendly pitching matchup where small margins and the home bullpen/defense will matter; prioritize it if you like quietly strategic games and narrative (Scott’s development vs. King’s steadiness), but don’t expect a slugfest.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -35.7 | 9.1% | -0.1 | -2.5 | 26.7 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -28.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.52 | 0.75 | -0.14 | -0.31 | 1.07 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -1.87 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.52 | 0.75 | -0.14 | -0.31 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 5.45 |
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -34.1 | 8.5% | 1.0 | 15.3 | 34.5 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -21.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.45 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -1.40 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.45 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.18 |
Christian Scott, New York Mets
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 100 | 10.0% | 62.3% | 95.4 mph | 27 | 19.7s | -25 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.09 | -0.28 | -0.58 | 0.59 | -0.49 | 0.65 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.19 | -0.14 | -0.29 | 0.59 | 0.49 | -0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.94 |
Michael King, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 98 | 11.2% | 61.9% | 93.3 mph | 31 | 18.5s | -17 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.02 | 0.25 | -0.76 | -0.41 | 0.57 | -0.33 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.05 | 0.12 | -0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.76 |
Kansas City Royals @ Minnesota Twins, 5:15p
Summary
Pitching makes this the game to watch: a young, hard-throwing Zebby Matthews brings upside and profile (high pNERD), while veteran Michael Wacha’s steadiness and negative “luck” suggest he may be due for regression — a classic pitcher-contrast with watchable tradeoffs. Matthews was a mid‑May recall and delivered an impressive early outing after a pectoral‑inflammation delay, giving this start genuine intrigue as he tries to turn strong peripherals into consistent results. Wacha, meanwhile, has been one of Kansas City’s most reliable arms this season and has posted a string of quality starts; his veteran command makes every inning meaningful. The NERD breakdown matches the eyeball test: a below‑average gNERD (9.51) driven down by two low tNERDs — neither lineup promises fireworks — but propped up by a high average pNERD (6.32) because Matthews’ better xFIP/velocity and both pitchers’ brisk paces should keep the game moving. Expect a pitcher’s duel with the higher upside on the Twins’ side and a tidy, low‑event affair unless the bullpens — especially KC’s shaky pen — intervene late.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -27.1 | 8.2% | 3.7 | 5.2 | -11.4 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 14.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.15 | 0.06 | 1.20 | 0.43 | -1.54 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 0.94 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.15 | 0.06 | 1.20 | 0.43 | -1.54 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.15 |
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -8.2 | 8.5% | -2.7 | -9.5 | 1.5 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -18.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.33 | 0.29 | -1.06 | -0.99 | -0.66 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -1.20 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.33 | 0.29 | -1.06 | -0.99 | -0.66 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.24 |
Michael Wacha, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 101 | 9.7% | 63.9% | 93.0 mph | 34 | 17.1s | -26 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.15 | -0.41 | 0.06 | -0.55 | 1.37 | -1.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.30 | -0.21 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.06 |
Zebby Matthews, Minnesota Twins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 89 | 11.1% | 65.0% | 95.4 mph | 26 | 16.5s | 21 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.54 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.59 | -0.76 | -1.97 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.09 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.57 |
Cincinnati Reds @ St. Louis Cardinals, 5:15p
Summary
Not a can't-miss pitcher duel, but an edge-of-your-seat local subplot: a solid Cardinals club (tNERD 7.15) tries to exploit a shaky Reds staff while a streaky Kyle Leahy looks to cement rotation cred against a Brady Singer who’s underperformed his peripherals. The gNERD of 9.50 sits a hair below both the historic mean (10.11) and today’s average (10.19), so this isn’t top-tier theatre by the numbers, but the matchup has narrative juice — Leahy has been making a case for the rotation and has a couple of recent effective outings, while the Reds tagged him for two homers on May 23; both starters carry modest pNERD values, so expect few overpowering swing-and-miss sequences and more contact-and-activity baseball. Leahy’s peripherals are steadier than Singer’s; Singer’s high “luck” component suggests he’s been unlucky and could run better than his surface 6.18 ERA indicates, which matters because Cincinnati’s bullpen is a real negative for watchability and St. Louis’s defense is a positive. Finally, both pitchers work quick (good for pacing), so this is a game for viewers who prefer momentum-light, tactical baseball with a meaningful roster storyline rather than a pure strikeout showcase.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, St. Louis Cardinals (2.17); radio, St. Louis Cardinals (2.15)
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -15.4 | 10.3% | 0.3 | 4.3 | -14.4 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 4.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.64 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.34 | -1.75 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.27 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.64 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.34 | -1.75 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.45 |
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -1.4 | 7.5% | 1.1 | 10.0 | 1.7 | $111.2M | 26.9 | 2.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.03 | -0.47 | 0.28 | 0.89 | -0.65 | -1.05 | -1.94 | 0.14 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.03 | -0.47 | 0.28 | 0.89 | -0.65 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.15 |
Brady Singer, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 115 | 8.9% | 61.5% | 91.1 mph | 29 | 16.8s | 29 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.96 | -0.77 | -0.92 | -1.45 | 0.04 | -1.73 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.92 | -0.38 | -0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.90 |
Kyle Leahy, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 8.9% | 61.8% | 93.8 mph | 29 | 17.2s | 4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.21 | -0.77 | -0.79 | -0.17 | 0.04 | -1.40 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.42 | -0.38 | -0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.50 |
Seattle Mariners @ Detroit Tigers, 3:40p
Summary
Worth a look if you care about starting-pitcher theatre more than fireworks: Bryan Woo’s higher pNERD and swing-and-miss profile make Seattle the more interesting watch, while Framber Valdez brings name recognition and a storyline comeback that keeps this from being a total snoozer. Woo’s underlying numbers and strike-rate push his pNERD into the upper tier, and he’s shown enough consistency to make his starts watchable—he’s listed with a respectable W/L and peripherals this season. Valdez’s pNERD is lower, but his return from a short suspension and a recent eye-catching, efficient complete game are narrative hooks that could pay off or crack under pressure. Team-wise, Seattle’s tNERD is the stronger of the two (better offense/bullpen components) while Detroit’s limp defense and baserunning drag its score down; both clubs show large positive “luck” values in the inputs, which implies they’ve been underperforming and could run hotter than these numbers suggest. The matchup also carries a vestige of postseason memory between these clubs, which adds a little extra spice. Overall gNERD sits below today’s mean, so this is mid-tier watchability—tune in for Woo’s stuff and Valdez’s second-act drama, not for a guaranteed classic.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 20.9 | 8.8% | -2.4 | -10.5 | 19.7 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 15.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.93 | 0.52 | -0.95 | -1.08 | 0.59 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 1.01 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.93 | 0.52 | -0.95 | -1.08 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 5.75 |
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.6 | 8.9% | -3.5 | -12.6 | 1.8 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 21.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.43 | 0.59 | -1.34 | -1.29 | -0.64 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.41 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.43 | 0.59 | -1.34 | -1.29 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 2.92 |
Bryan Woo, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 90 | 11.6% | 68.2% | 95.6 mph | 26 | 20.7s | -2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.49 | 0.42 | 1.80 | 0.68 | -0.76 | 1.47 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.97 | 0.21 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.59 |
Framber Valdez, Detroit Tigers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 9.2% | 65.9% | 94.0 mph | 32 | 19.4s | 2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.27 | -0.63 | 0.88 | -0.08 | 0.84 | 0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.53 | -0.32 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.29 |
Athletics @ Houston Astros, 5:10p
Summary
Low-sizzle pitching matchup: a gNERD of 8.74 puts this game below both today’s average (10.19) and the historical median, so it’s not a can’t-miss slate piece — but there’s local color worth a look. Jack Perkins shows up with pNERD = 0 (no detailed starter data), which usually means a matchup built on curiosity — a young A’s arm recently shuffled into the big‑league mix rather than a proven rotation horse, so you’ll be watching for command and first‑time jitters. Peter Lambert is the safer option on the bump: modestly below-average pNERD (2.63) with an xFIP- around league average and steady velocity, suggesting average strikeout upside but not swing‑and‑miss dominance. Team-wise the A’s tNERD (5.68) is slightly above today’s team mean and flagged by a very large positive Luck (23), meaning they’ve underperformed underlying metrics and could surprise; Houston’s lower tNERD (4.17) is buoyed by a strong bullpen, which makes late‑game fireworks less likely. Taken together: small upside from an intriguing rookie start and A’s volatile profile, but overall low drama on the pitchers’ ledger.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Houston Astros (1.99)
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -0.1 | 8.6% | -2.4 | -8.9 | 13.4 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 23.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.02 | 0.37 | -0.95 | -0.93 | 0.16 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 1.54 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.02 | 0.37 | -0.95 | -0.93 | 0.16 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.68 |
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 12.5 | 8.8% | -0.1 | 1.3 | -10.1 | $232.7M | 28.9 | 7.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.57 | 0.52 | -0.14 | 0.05 | -1.45 | 0.34 | -0.16 | 0.47 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.57 | 0.52 | -0.14 | 0.05 | -1.45 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.17 |
Jack Perkins, Athletics
No detailed stats available
Peter Lambert, Houston Astros
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 10.9% | 62.2% | 94.3 mph | 29 | 19.7s | -13 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.32 | 0.11 | -0.64 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.65 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.65 | 0.06 | -0.32 | 0.07 | 0.00 | -0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.63 |
San Francisco Giants @ Chicago Cubs, 11:20a
Summary
Not must-see TV, but worth a glance: Edward Cabrera’s return from a finger-blister IL gives this game a real "can-he-pick-up-where-he-left-off?" storyline, while Robbie Ray’s low pNERD and the Giants’ shaky team metrics make this feel tilted toward the home side. MLB reports indicate Cabrera was on the IL with a blister and was being activated for this window, with the club penciling him into the rotation.
Cabrera’s 5.57 pNERD is the headline — he carries above-average velocity and a quick pace that translate into strikeout upside, and the Cubs’ tNERD (8.34) is buoyed by elite fielding and a competent offense, which amplifies his projection.
By contrast Ray’s 0.93 pNERD reflects recent inconsistency (including a rough, high-run outing in mid‑May), and the Giants’ low tNERD (2.27) is dragged down by baserunning, defense and a thin bullpen; their positive Luck suggests they’ve been underperforming and could be slightly better than their surface metrics show.
With a gNERD of 8.56 (below today’s average), this is more of a eyebrow-raiser than a priority pick — watch if you want Cabrera’s comeback angle and the Cubs’ defensive matchup, skip if you want elite pitching fireworks.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -0.1 | 6.9% | -5.9 | -6.0 | -5.7 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 18.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.02 | -0.93 | -2.19 | -0.65 | -1.15 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 1.21 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.02 | -0.93 | -2.19 | -0.65 | -1.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 2.27 |
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.2 | 8.1% | -0.5 | 25.6 | 2.5 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 7.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.95 | -0.02 | -0.28 | 2.39 | -0.59 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.95 | -0.02 | -0.28 | 2.39 | -0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 8.34 |
Robbie Ray, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 114 | 10.9% | 61.1% | 93.3 mph | 34 | 20.3s | -2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.90 | 0.11 | -1.10 | -0.41 | 1.37 | 1.14 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.81 | 0.06 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.93 |
Edward Cabrera, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 97 | 11.9% | 62.1% | 95.9 mph | 28 | 17.8s | 3 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.08 | 0.55 | -0.66 | 0.83 | -0.23 | -0.91 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.33 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.57 |
Washington Nationals @ Arizona Diamondbacks, 6:40p
Summary
Not a can't-miss show — more of a mildly interesting matchup with one storyline worth tuning in for: Foster Griffin's steady season meets Merrill Kelly's veteran volatility. The gNERD sits near today's low end (8.20), mainly because the pitching side is sleepy overall: a middling Foster Griffin (pNERD 4.35) vs. an aging Merrill Kelly whose peripherals look rough (pNERD 0.55, big xFIP- hit), so the game’s upside is lineup-driven rather than a true pitching duel.
Washington’s tNERD (6.88) gets a lift from youthful roster traits, baserunning, and a serviceable offense, but their bullpen is a real drag — that split makes the Nats more interesting if the starter exits early. Griffin has been the Nationals’ most reliable early-season arm and has delivered multiple quality starts, including a career-high strikeout outing that suggests he can keep this game competitive.
Kelly adds narrative spice: he began the year dealing with a back issue and an IL stint but recently threw his first career complete game at Coors, reminding viewers he can still spin a strong outing.
Bottom line: low overall watchability by gNERD, but worth a look if you want to see whether Griffin keeps pacing his young rotation and whether Kelly’s veteran bounceback has legs.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Arizona Diamondbacks (2.19); radio, Washington Nationals (2.20)
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 16.9 | 8.7% | 3.3 | -0.1 | -18.4 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -30.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.76 | 0.44 | 1.06 | -0.08 | -2.02 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -2.00 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.76 | 0.44 | 1.06 | -0.08 | -2.02 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.88 |
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -11.8 | 7.0% | 1.9 | 12.2 | 15.4 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -17.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.49 | -0.85 | 0.57 | 1.10 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -1.13 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.49 | -0.85 | 0.57 | 1.10 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.62 |
Foster Griffin, Washington Nationals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 95 | 9.8% | 64.6% | 91.3 mph | 30 | 18.5s | -3 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.20 | -0.37 | 0.36 | -1.36 | 0.31 | -0.33 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.39 | -0.18 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.35 |
Merrill Kelly, Arizona Diamondbacks
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 126 | 10.5% | 62.4% | 92.0 mph | 37 | 18.3s | -3 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.60 | -0.06 | -0.54 | -1.03 | 2.17 | -0.50 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -3.20 | -0.03 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.55 |
Milwaukee Brewers @ Colorado Rockies, 5:40p
Summary
Low-ish watchability: the gNERD (8.10) sits near the bottom of today’s slate and below the historical mean, so this is more “check if you care about pitcher development” than must-see TV. The Brewers bring the more interesting team profile — younger roster, strong bullpen metrics on paper — while the Rockies’ offense is one of the weaker units in baseball, so this looks like a mismatch unless Coors Field does its usual thing. The probable-starter listings and records line up with those impressions.
Brandon Sproat offers the biggest upside here: above-average velocity and strikeout feel, a mid-4 pNERD that signals upside for a young arm who’s flashed Ks but still struggles to go deep into games. Recent write-ups note both his swing-and-miss potential and short outing history. Ryan Feltner, recently activated from the IL, profiles as a below-average to league-average option with modest peripheral metrics and less ceiling, which lowers the game’s pitching intrigue.
If you prize developmental storylines — Sproat’s growth and how the Brewers’ bullpen holds up after recent reliever exits — tune in; otherwise, the low gNERD and the Rockies’ weak offense make this a lower-priority watch.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Milwaukee Brewers (2.66); radio, Milwaukee Brewers (2.56)
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 3.7 | 6.6% | 1.2 | -7.6 | 30.8 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -30.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.19 | -1.16 | 0.32 | -0.80 | 1.35 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -2.00 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.19 | -1.16 | 0.32 | -0.80 | 1.35 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 6.28 |
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -38.4 | 6.6% | -0.6 | -4.5 | 18.8 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 5.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.64 | -1.16 | -0.32 | -0.51 | 0.53 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.34 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.64 | -1.16 | -0.32 | -0.51 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.03 |
Brandon Sproat, Milwaukee Brewers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 9.7% | 61.2% | 96.4 mph | 25 | 18.8s | 44 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.67 | -0.41 | -1.05 | 1.06 | -1.03 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.34 | -0.21 | -0.53 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.86 |
Ryan Feltner, Colorado Rockies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 10.8% | 62.0% | 94.7 mph | 29 | 19.0s | 0 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.32 | 0.07 | -0.73 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.65 | 0.04 | -0.36 | 0.26 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.04 |
Baltimore Orioles @ Toronto Blue Jays, 4:07p
Summary
Low-energy pitching matchup and quiet offensive profiles make this one the least watchable game on the board — interesting mostly if you care about a young strikeout artist (Trey Yesavage) trying to pile up whiffs against a Blue Jays lineup that’s been trending soft. Fox Sports and MLB’s previews list Brandon Young and Trey Yesavage as the probables and show Yesavage’s season peripherals are better-looking (low ERA, strong K totals) while Young’s results are uneven.
The gNERD of 8.08 sits at the bottom of today’s range, driven by middling team NERDs (Orioles 4.92, Blue Jays 3.40) and a split in pitcher quality: Yesavage’s pNERD (6.06) reflects strong swinging-strike profile and youth, while Young’s 1.78 is dragged down by poor xFIP- and weak underlying swing-and-miss. Team stats underline the lull — Toronto’s offense metrics (low barrel rate, negative batting runs) and Baltimore’s defensive hole make big-run fireworks unlikely. Sportsnet notes Yesavage has been in and out of the rotation and is a younger pitcher to watch for K-seekers.
If you want compelling pitching-versus-batting chess, this isn’t it; if you like tracking a young strikeout arm against a tame offense, tune in early.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 8.8 | 8.0% | 2.0 | -10.9 | 21.1 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -3.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.41 | -0.09 | 0.60 | -1.12 | 0.68 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.19 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.41 | -0.09 | 0.60 | -1.12 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.92 |
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -14.4 | 6.5% | -2.6 | 6.1 | 22.3 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 4.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.60 | -1.23 | -1.02 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.27 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.60 | -1.23 | -1.02 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.40 |
Brandon Young, Baltimore Orioles
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 119 | 10.1% | 63.9% | 93.9 mph | 27 | 19.0s | -37 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.19 | -0.24 | 0.05 | -0.12 | -0.49 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.38 | -0.12 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.49 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 1.78 |
Trey Yesavage, Toronto Blue Jays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 100 | 13.8% | 62.8% | 94.3 mph | 22 | 18.8s | -47 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.09 | 1.39 | -0.38 | 0.07 | -1.83 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.19 | 0.69 | -0.19 | 0.07 | 1.83 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.06 |
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on June 4, 2026