MLB: What to watch on June 10, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Pittsburgh Pirates, 3:40p
Summary
High gNERD (15.49) and a top-heavy matchup make this the clear “watch if you want pitching-versus-batting theater” game: Shohei Ohtani’s elite stuff and a Dodgers lineup that’s been torching the Pirates create a strong watchability hook, while Jared Jones’s very limited data introduces real unpredictability. The NERD math is straightforward: an above-average team NERD for the Dodgers (10.25) plus a huge pNERD for Ohtani (9.11) tilts the game toward strikeouts, velocity, and launch-angle fireworks, and the Pirates’ middling tNERD and shaky fielding suggest there will be run-scoring opportunities when the Dodgers connect. Ohtani’s season has been historically dominant, with surface metrics and strikeout/velocity profiles that justify the high pNERD. Jared Jones is a low-information variable—recently back from a long IL stint and still settling into a starting role—so his pNERD of 0.00 is meaningful: expect platoon/usage questions and early-inning volatility. Recent results (Dodgers’ offensive outburst vs Pittsburgh) reinforce the mismatch and add viewing value for fans who prefer action over pitchers’ duels.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 63.4 | 10.0% | -2.8 | 19.8 | 27.8 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 6.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.55 | 1.47 | -1.05 | 1.67 | 1.04 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.55 | 1.47 | -1.05 | 1.67 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.25 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 15.8 | 8.1% | 6.0 | -11.5 | 12.8 | $119.1M | 28.8 | -7.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.66 | -0.02 | 1.90 | -1.06 | 0.00 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.44 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.66 | -0.02 | 1.90 | -1.06 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.63 |
Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 77 | 13.6% | 64.5% | 97.6 mph | 31 | 18.2s | -59 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.28 | 1.37 | 0.30 | 1.62 | 0.57 | -0.59 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.56 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 9.11 |
Jared Jones, Pittsburgh Pirates
No detailed stats available
Atlanta Braves @ Chicago White Sox, 4:40p
Summary
Good pitching and a surprising team split make this one worth tuning into: Atlanta’s veteran strikeout ace Chris Sale gives the game high pitcher-watchability, while Chicago’s surprisingly punchy lineup and announced probable starter Davis Martin turn what the gNERD flags as a top-quartile contest into a real viewing prize. Sale’s pNERD (8.27) matches the eye test—he’s coming off a string of effective starts with swing-and-miss stuff and mid-90s velocity that creates strikeout upside, even if his pace is plodding; that profile explains much of the game’s 14.65 gNERD. The White Sox were listed as naming Davis Martin as the probable starter (the NERD input showed “TBD” with no pitcher data), and Martin’s 2026 surface numbers suggest he’s a legitimate counter—so the matchup isn’t one-sided the way a true TBD would be. Team NERDs favor entertaining at-bats from both sides: Atlanta’s big run production and barrel rate versus Chicago’s younger, energetic roster make this medium-to-high scoring potential; expect strikeouts, some loud contact, and managerial bullpen chess.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Atlanta Braves (2.36); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 30.3 | 9.5% | -0.5 | 7.1 | 26.5 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -20.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.23 | 1.07 | -0.28 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -1.26 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.23 | 1.07 | -0.28 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.54 |
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.4 | 9.2% | -1.1 | 0.9 | 11.6 | $105.8M | 27.1 | 4.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.88 | 0.84 | -0.48 | 0.02 | -0.08 | -1.11 | -1.76 | 0.25 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.88 | 0.84 | -0.48 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.49 |
Chris Sale, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 74 | 13.9% | 67.5% | 95.7 mph | 37 | 20.5s | -20 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.45 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 0.72 | 2.17 | 1.30 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.91 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.00 | -0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.27 |
New York Yankees @ Cleveland Guardians, 10:10a
Summary
This one’s worth tuning into: a high gNERD (13.70) puts it well above both today’s average and the historical median, mostly because Parker Messick’s breakout stuff meets an offensively dangerous Yankees lineup. Carlos Rodón’s return from an early-season IL stint leaves some questions about his rust and strike-rate, while Messick’s 2026 form (6–2, 2.40) and strong peripheral profile make him the real draw.
The NERD breakdown matches what you’d expect: an above-average tNERD for New York (big batting-run and barrel contributions) against a Cleveland club that brings younger, cheaper depth and a surprisingly useful bullpen — that contrast boosts watchability because it promises both offense and late-inning leverage. Rodón’s pNERD is modest (2.82) — his xFIP- and strike-rate components suggest he’s not missing many bats right now — while Messick’s high pNERD (8.02) and low xFIP- point to quality swing-and-miss and efficient sequencing. The human story — a veteran coming back from elbow work vs. a poised young lefty carving up lineups — is tidy, analytically supported, and makes this game one of the better viewing options on the card.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Cleveland Guardians (2.16); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 40.3 | 10.6% | 1.9 | 3.3 | 21.4 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -3.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.63 | 1.94 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.60 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.19 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.63 | 1.94 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 8.92 |
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -14.7 | 6.2% | 2.0 | 2.9 | 27.4 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 8.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.56 | -1.51 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 1.01 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.51 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.56 | -1.51 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 1.01 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 7.65 |
Carlos Rodón, New York Yankees
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 11.3% | 60.4% | 94.2 mph | 33 | 19.3s | -32 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.17 | 0.33 | -1.30 | 0.01 | 1.10 | 0.31 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.35 | 0.16 | -0.65 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.82 |
Parker Messick, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 81 | 11.9% | 63.4% | 93.1 mph | 25 | 16.8s | -23 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.05 | 0.60 | -0.14 | -0.51 | -1.03 | -1.74 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.09 | 0.30 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.02 |
Milwaukee Brewers @ Athletics, 6:05p
Summary
Worth tuning in: this is a higher-than-average game (gNERD 13.58) because you get a high-variance duel — Jack Perkins projects as a true whiff/strike guy while Brandon Sproat is a high-velocity pitcher with worse underlying results, and both clubs’ profiles promise some live action.
Perkins’ pNERD (8.81) is the headline: better xFIP relative to league, elite swing-and-miss and strike rates, and strong recent results at Las Vegas Ballpark that suggest his stuff plays up in this venue — he’s been used both as a starter and multi-inning option for the A’s this year. Sproat (pNERD 4.79) brings power (96+ mph) but fewer whiffs and weaker strike-rate/xFIP indicators; he’s a recent acquisition to Milwaukee and has struggled in big-league line lines so far. Milwaukee’s slightly higher tNERD (7.08) plus a taxed bullpen and a righty-friendly lineup (Jake Bauers mashes RHP) make this a game where Perkins’ swing-and-miss matters and late-inning chaos is plausible. Overall: high watchability for fans who like strikeouts, fastballs that play up, and bullpen theater — not a must-see classic, but comfortably above today’s average.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Milwaukee Brewers (2.66); radio, Milwaukee Brewers (2.56)
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 18.2 | 6.9% | 1.4 | -6.3 | 29.5 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -35.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.75 | -0.96 | 0.35 | -0.61 | 1.16 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -2.20 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.75 | -0.96 | 0.35 | -0.61 | 1.16 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 7.08 |
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 6.0 | 8.7% | -2.2 | -9.6 | 18.4 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 26.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.26 | 0.45 | -0.85 | -0.90 | 0.39 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 1.64 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.26 | 0.45 | -0.85 | -0.90 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.47 |
Brandon Sproat, Milwaukee Brewers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 9.4% | 60.9% | 96.4 mph | 25 | 18.9s | 41 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.64 | -0.53 | -1.11 | 1.05 | -1.03 | -0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.28 | -0.27 | -0.55 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.79 |
Jack Perkins, Athletics
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 90 | 14.5% | 67.3% | 96.3 mph | 26 | 19.9s | 55 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.52 | 1.78 | 1.41 | 1.01 | -0.76 | 0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.05 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 1.01 | 0.76 | -0.40 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.81 |
Philadelphia Phillies @ Toronto Blue Jays, 4:07p
Summary
Pick this one if you like watching a power-armed, high-upside starter try to exploit a lineup while a famously violent veteran gambler of an arm reintroduces himself to game action — the matchup is noisy, imperfect, and therefore interesting. Jesús Luzardo is the true draw: his pNERD (10.28) reflects real strikestuff and above-average underlying metrics (strong xFIP-, high velo) and a big positive “luck” component that suggests his results could improve from here, so watching if he sharpens his command is worthwhile.
Max Scherzer’s return from the injured list adds drama but cuts both ways — he’s a veteran with history, yet he’s coming off forearm and ankle issues and a tiny, ugly-looking sample (high early-season ERA), so the outing has volatility rather than reliability.
Team context nudges interest: Philadelphia’s tNERD (6.21) is higher thanks to baserunning and bullpen profile, while Toronto’s defense helps mask offensive slippage. With a gNERD of 12.48 (above both today’s mean and the historical median), this is a watchable pitcher’s duel with upside for momentum swings rather than a paint‑drying contest.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -30.2 | 7.8% | 5.0 | 0.3 | 31.2 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -4.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.18 | -0.26 | 1.56 | -0.03 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.25 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.18 | -0.26 | 1.56 | -0.03 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 6.21 |
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -13.4 | 6.7% | -3.7 | 6.9 | 24.7 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 6.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.51 | -1.12 | -1.35 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.51 | -1.12 | -1.35 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.47 |
Jesús Luzardo, Philadelphia Phillies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 76 | 13.5% | 64.0% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 17.4s | 33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.34 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.24 | -0.23 | -1.24 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.68 | 0.66 | 0.05 | 1.24 | 0.23 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.28 |
Max Scherzer, Toronto Blue Jays
No detailed stats available
Seattle Mariners @ Baltimore Orioles, 3:35p
Summary
This is the kind of middling, quietly intriguing matchup where one pitcher’s real stuff (and the other’s shaky peripherals) makes the broadcast worth keeping on in the background. George Kirby’s high pNERD (8.40) and above-average velocity/strike rate give this game a real chance of seeing whiffs and length, while Brandon Young’s low pNERD (2.51) suggests the Orioles could be in for more contact than they’d like. Kirby’s peripherals — a sub-100 xFIP- standing and a noticeable uptick in velocity/strike% — underline why he’s the attraction; expect chase-and-miss stuff early. Young’s recent run of quality starts has masked an elevated xFIP, so he’s not an automatic disaster, just a candidate to get hit harder by quality contact. Both clubs’ tNERDs are near the league-average zone, and Seattle’s big positive ‘Luck’ component implies their record may understate their upside, while Baltimore’s recent skid and roster shuffling make them less stable. For viewers who like pitcher-driven chess with a chance of early offense, this is firmly worth tuning into; for those wanting fireworks, the box score could go either way.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Seattle Mariners (2.52)
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 24.7 | 8.7% | -2.4 | -14.0 | 16.0 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 18.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.01 | 0.45 | -0.92 | -1.28 | 0.22 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 1.14 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.01 | 0.45 | -0.92 | -1.28 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 5.35 |
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 9.1 | 8.4% | 1.9 | -9.0 | 20.0 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -8.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.52 | -0.84 | 0.50 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.50 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.52 | -0.84 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.22 |
George Kirby, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 85 | 10.3% | 67.0% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 19.0s | 19 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.81 | -0.13 | 1.28 | 1.24 | -0.23 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.63 | -0.06 | 0.64 | 1.24 | 0.23 | -0.03 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.40 |
Brandon Young, Baltimore Orioles
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 115 | 10.0% | 65.1% | 94.0 mph | 27 | 19.1s | -31 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.93 | -0.26 | 0.55 | -0.08 | -0.50 | 0.15 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.86 | -0.13 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.50 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.51 |
Boston Red Sox @ Tampa Bay Rays, 10:10a
Summary
Two very different pitchers make this worth a glance: an emergency lefty with almost no big-league résumé (Jake Bennett) against a rejuvenated Drew Rasmussen who just carved up the Marlins. The boxscore won’t promise fireworks—gNERD sits at a middling 10.70—but the pitcher matchup supplies a clean narrative: Rasmussen (pNERD 7.98) has a recent 7‑inning, one‑hit, nine‑K bounce‑back that makes him the game’s main draw, while Bennett’s pNERD of 0 means you’re essentially watching a short scouting report live as Boston taps a recall/start option. Boston’s higher tNERD (5.93) is driven by fielding and a solid bullpen and a +14 luck signal that suggests the club has been underperforming its peripherals; Tampa’s lower tNERD (2.49) and weaker barrel/bullpen components point to fewer lineup-driven fireworks. The game is most watchable for Rasmussen’s stuff and for monitoring whether Bennett can eat innings or collapse quickly—if you prefer predicted quality pitching and possible low‑scoring tension, tune in; if you want offensive slugfest, this one is lower priority.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.8 | 7.1% | 2.3 | 18.9 | 19.9 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 14.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.24 | -0.80 | 0.66 | 1.59 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.24 | -0.80 | 0.66 | 1.59 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 5.93 |
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 5.5 | 5.2% | 2.3 | -10.7 | 3.2 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 7.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.24 | -2.29 | 0.66 | -0.99 | -0.66 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.44 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.24 | -2.29 | 0.66 | -0.99 | -0.66 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.49 |
Jake Bennett, Boston Red Sox
No detailed stats available
Drew Rasmussen, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 73 | 10.3% | 65.5% | 95.8 mph | 30 | 18.7s | -2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.51 | -0.13 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.30 | -0.18 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 3.02 | -0.06 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.98 |
St. Louis Cardinals @ New York Mets, 4:10p
Summary
This is a middling, watch-if-you-like-starter/strategy chess match more than a fireworks show — the teams’ profiles promise subtle interest (defense, baserunning, a bullpen in trouble) while the starting-pitcher slate mutes the pure strikeout spectacle. The gNERD (10.38) sits roughly at historical median territory and just under today's game-average, so it’s not a must-see but has tidy storylines: St. Louis’s strong defense, young roster and smart baserunning (tNERD 7.81) clash with a Mets offense that’s been scuffling despite decent barrel rates (tNERD 5.51). Andre Pallante’s pNERD is modest; his profile (serviceable xFIP-, good velocity, earlier road success) suggests length and competence rather than dominance. Austin Warren figures as an opener/short-stint starter for the Mets, which raises intrigue about bullpen usage and matchup swings — and the Mets have had bullpen-run issues this year, which could make late innings chaotic. If you prefer tidy, pitcher-driven games with managerial maneuvering and a chance for a late bullpen unravel, tune in; if you want high-octane offense and strikeouts, there are better options.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 5.3 | 7.5% | 2.7 | 8.8 | 5.6 | $111.2M | 26.9 | 1.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.24 | -0.49 | 0.79 | 0.71 | -0.50 | -1.05 | -1.94 | 0.07 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.24 | -0.49 | 0.79 | 0.71 | -0.50 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.81 |
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -36.7 | 9.2% | -0.5 | -3.3 | 29.0 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -25.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.44 | 0.84 | -0.28 | -0.35 | 1.12 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -1.57 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.44 | 0.84 | -0.28 | -0.35 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 5.51 |
Andre Pallante, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 9.2% | 63.3% | 95.2 mph | 27 | 20.2s | -5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.23 | -0.62 | -0.16 | 0.49 | -0.50 | 1.05 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.46 | -0.31 | -0.08 | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.40 |
Austin Warren, New York Mets
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 97 | 10.8% | 63.7% | 93.8 mph | 30 | 19.0s | -46 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.12 | 0.10 | -0.02 | -0.18 | 0.30 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.23 | 0.05 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.04 |
Cincinnati Reds @ San Diego Padres, 1:10p
Summary
Worth a look if you like tidy contrasts more than fireworks — gNERD 10.37 is basically average historically (just above the median) but a hair below today's slate, and the story here is matchup texture, not ace duel. The Padres' high tNERD (8.28) comes from excellent defense and a bullpen that grades well in the components, plus strong local broadcast ratings, while the Reds offer a middling offense with a surprising barrel profile and a shaky relief corps; that mix makes for low-leverage intrigue rather than a must-see. Brady Singer and Michael King both carry low pNERDs (~3s), so the starters themselves aren't the headline: Singer's surface line (2‑6, 5.89) looks ugly on paper but his big positive luck signal suggests he's underperforming his peripherals and could sketch a rebound, and King (about 4‑5, 3.41) has been the steadier option. If you prioritize pitcher-versus-lineup storylines (Singer's possible correction vs. a well‑fielding Padres team) and like watching bullpen/defense swings, tune in; if you need high-strikeout starters or guaranteed run-scoring, this one can be deprioritized.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -19.9 | 10.0% | 2.2 | -0.1 | -13.2 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 8.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.77 | 1.47 | 0.62 | -0.07 | -1.80 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.51 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.77 | 1.47 | 0.62 | -0.07 | -1.80 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.53 |
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -41.8 | 8.4% | 1.4 | 16.6 | 39.7 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -21.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.64 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 1.39 | 1.86 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -1.32 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.64 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 1.39 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.28 |
Brady Singer, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 113 | 8.9% | 60.9% | 91.2 mph | 29 | 16.8s | 23 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.81 | -0.76 | -1.11 | -1.41 | 0.04 | -1.74 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.63 | -0.38 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.10 |
Michael King, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 98 | 10.9% | 61.8% | 93.3 mph | 31 | 18.4s | -12 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.06 | 0.15 | -0.74 | -0.41 | 0.57 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.12 | 0.07 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.83 |
Chicago Cubs @ Colorado Rockies, 5:40p
Summary
This feels like a weekday must-see if you like mismatch theater: a high-tNERD Cubs club and an intriguing Shōta Imanaga profile promise more nuance than the scoreboard might suggest, while Coors Field plus Michael Lorenzen’s season-long struggles point toward an offense-forward, watchable slog.
The gNERD (10.22) sits essentially at the historical median, but the composition matters: Chicago’s tNERD (8.41) is buoyed by elite fielding, positive luck and strong broadcaster appeal, while Colorado’s offense is a drag (tNERD 2.39), so expect more action when the Rockies bat. Imanaga’s above-average pNERD (6.49) comes from swing-and-miss and positive luck, though MLB notes he’s given up a surprising run of homers recently — a real concern pitching in Coors. Lorenzen’s pNERD (3.14) and his 8.00+ ERA this year make him a likely source of runs rather than strategic duels. The Rockies’ injury-thinned roster and shaky bullpen lower the chance of a tight game; the market also leans Cubs.
Bottom line: pick this if you want offensive noise and one starter (Imanaga) whose profile adds some analytical intrigue; don’t expect a classic pitchers’ duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 18.7 | 7.9% | 0.1 | 28.1 | 1.2 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 14.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.77 | -0.18 | -0.08 | 2.40 | -0.80 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.88 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.77 | -0.18 | -0.08 | 2.40 | -0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 8.41 |
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -40.6 | 6.7% | -0.1 | -2.6 | 18.1 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 6.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.59 | -1.12 | -0.15 | -0.28 | 0.37 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.38 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.59 | -1.12 | -0.15 | -0.28 | 0.37 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.39 |
Shota Imanaga, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 93 | 14.4% | 64.5% | 91.9 mph | 32 | 19.0s | 24 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.35 | 1.73 | 0.32 | -1.08 | 0.84 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.49 |
Michael Lorenzen, Colorado Rockies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 8.6% | 62.4% | 94.0 mph | 34 | 18.7s | 63 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.52 | -0.90 | -0.51 | -0.08 | 1.37 | -0.18 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.05 | -0.45 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.14 |
Arizona Diamondbacks @ Miami Marlins, 3:40p
Summary
Not a can't-miss pitching duel — more of a bullpen-centric curiosity: a modest gNERD (9.38) driven by a lively matchup profile but capped by two low pNERD starters. Ryne Nelson brings a decent heater and innings durability but a low strikeout ceiling and rising underlying metrics (FIP/xFIP concerns and multiple recent low-K outings), so he looks like someone who can eat time but not necessarily dominate.
Ryan Gusto’s pNERD registers at 0 because detailed component data are thin here; he’s a depth arm with very limited big-league work this year and recent short outings that make an early hook likely — in short, expect a quick turn to the bullpens.
Team-wise the Marlins add watchability via aggressive baserunning and a younger, cheaper roster that plays fast, while Arizona’s value comes from above-average fielding and a legitimately strong relief corps — the latter raising the entertainment if Gusto exits early.
Bottom line: tune in if you like strategic bullpen chess and baserunning sparks; skip if you want starting-pitcher dominance — this one is interesting, not essential.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Arizona Diamondbacks (2.19); radio, Arizona Diamondbacks (1.92)
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -16.2 | 7.2% | 1.4 | 15.3 | 14.1 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -16.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.62 | -0.73 | 0.35 | 1.28 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -1.01 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.62 | -0.73 | 0.35 | 1.28 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.38 |
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -8.9 | 6.3% | 5.2 | -1.5 | 17.0 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 2.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.33 | -1.43 | 1.63 | -0.19 | 0.29 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 0.13 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.33 | -1.43 | 1.63 | -0.19 | 0.29 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.97 |
Ryne Nelson, Arizona Diamondbacks
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 118 | 9.0% | 67.1% | 96.3 mph | 28 | 20.7s | -7 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.10 | -0.71 | 1.34 | 1.01 | -0.23 | 1.46 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.21 | -0.36 | 0.67 | 1.01 | 0.23 | -0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.41 |
Ryan Gusto, Miami Marlins
No detailed stats available
Texas Rangers @ Kansas City Royals, 4:40p
Summary
Watchability: modest—this won't be a must-see drama but has a few tidy plotlines worth a glance. The gNERD of 9.00 sits a bit below the day’s average, and both teams carry middling tNERD marks, so expect something more workmanlike than must-watch fireworks.
MacKenzie Gore (pNERD 4.91) brings lively velocity and bounce-back potential after a couple of mixed outings this month — he exited one May start with an injury but also showed a strong follow-up outing, so there’s intrigue in whether he can reassert his stuff. Seth Lugo (pNERD 4.29) is the veteran counterpoint: low-ish velocity and fewer whiffs than in his peak, but a mercifully quick pace that keeps the game moving and slightly improves watchability.
Team context pushes this toward a lower-key viewing choice: Kansas City’s offense has been sputtering and their bullpen has been a clear weak link, while both clubs show positive “luck” signals in the NERD components (suggesting some regression is possible). If you value starting-pitcher matchups and tempo over explosive offense, tune in; if you want a fireworks display, this probably won’t be it.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Kansas City Royals (2.11); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.3 | 7.8% | 0.0 | 2.9 | 16.4 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 13.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.27 | -0.26 | -0.12 | 0.20 | 0.25 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.82 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.27 | -0.26 | -0.12 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.64 |
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -28.0 | 8.5% | 2.8 | 6.8 | -9.7 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 15.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.09 | 0.29 | 0.82 | 0.54 | -1.56 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 0.95 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.09 | 0.29 | 0.82 | 0.54 | -1.56 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.16 |
MacKenzie Gore, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 98 | 10.8% | 63.0% | 95.4 mph | 27 | 19.5s | 5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.29 | 0.58 | -0.50 | 0.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.12 | 0.05 | -0.14 | 0.58 | 0.50 | -0.24 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.91 |
Seth Lugo, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 101 | 7.8% | 65.1% | 91.5 mph | 36 | 16.3s | -10 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.12 | -1.26 | 0.55 | -1.27 | 1.90 | -2.15 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.23 | -0.63 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.29 |
Washington Nationals @ San Francisco Giants, 12:45p
Summary
Not a can’t-miss showdown — gNERD sits low at 7.87, so expect a quiet, pitcher-leaning game unless the Nats’ shaky bullpen or the Giants’ ‘positive luck’ swing things wildly. Foster Griffin is the main reason to tune in: his pNERD (4.78) and strong road run of one-or-fewer earned runs in many starts suggest he can keep this low-scoring; previews list him as the Nationals’ reliable lefty starter.
The matchup skews dull on paper because Robbie Ray’s pNERD is weak (0.83) and his season has been middling (4.12 ERA, uneven results), which lowers the game’s upside.
Team-wise, the Nationals’ tNERD (7.61) reflects pop on the bases, youth, and some batted‑ball juice, but a glaringly poor bullpen figure adds late-game drama risk; the Giants’ low tNERD (2.50) masks a sizable positive “luck” number that hints at regression toward better offense, and a thin bullpen depth that’s been a storyline this year.
Bottom line: this isn’t a top watch by NERD standards, but Griffin’s form plus bullpen volatility on both sides means it can become interesting if the game stays tight into the late innings.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.0 | 9.0% | 3.5 | 2.8 | -14.8 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -32.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.86 | 0.68 | 1.06 | 0.19 | -1.91 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -2.01 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.86 | 0.68 | 1.06 | 0.19 | -1.91 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.61 |
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 5.9 | 6.8% | -6.0 | -6.9 | -4.9 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 21.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.26 | -1.04 | -2.13 | -0.66 | -1.22 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 1.32 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.26 | -1.04 | -2.13 | -0.66 | -1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 2.50 |
Foster Griffin, Washington Nationals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 93 | 9.9% | 64.9% | 91.3 mph | 30 | 18.4s | -5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.35 | -0.31 | 0.45 | -1.36 | 0.30 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.70 | -0.15 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.78 |
Robbie Ray, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 116 | 11.2% | 60.9% | 93.3 mph | 34 | 20.3s | -13 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.99 | 0.28 | -1.13 | -0.41 | 1.37 | 1.13 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.98 | 0.14 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.83 |
Houston Astros @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
Low overall entertainment — gNERD 6.72 puts this near the bottom of today’s slate — but Reid Detmers gives it a live subplot: a young lefty who’s started to hum is worth tuning in for. The scoreboard metrics explain the rest: both teams produce weak tNERD contributions (Astros 3.19, Angels 0.45) and the game’s low gNERD reflects poor lineup and bullpen profiles more than pitching drama.
Detmers is the real attraction — a high pNERD (7.62) driven by an 85 xFIP-, rising whiff rate, youth and a streak of good fortune and recent dominant outings that include a 14‑K performance and a tidy scoreless start — so expect swing-and-miss stuff from the Angels’ side. Peter Lambert’s pNERD (2.17) and inflated xFIP- (108) suggest he’s more hittable than exciting, and Houston’s shaky bullpen component (-6.5) erases a lot of late-inning intrigue. Lambert and Detmers are listed as the probables for the matchup. Houston also lost recent bench flexibility when LaMonte Wade Jr. hit the 10-day IL, trimming a lefty option.
If you like strikeout-heavy lefty work and a clear platoon of outcomes, check Detmers; otherwise this one ranks low on the daily watchlist.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Los Angeles Angels (2.01)
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 11.7 | 8.5% | -1.6 | -0.3 | -6.5 | $232.7M | 28.9 | 5.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.49 | 0.29 | -0.65 | -0.08 | -1.33 | 0.34 | -0.16 | 0.32 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.49 | 0.29 | -0.65 | -0.08 | -1.33 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.19 |
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.8 | 9.4% | -4.7 | -21.9 | -4.4 | $191.6M | 28.6 | -8.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.41 | 1.00 | -1.69 | -1.97 | -1.19 | -0.13 | -0.39 | -0.50 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.41 | 1.00 | -1.69 | -1.97 | -1.19 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 0.45 |
Peter Lambert, Houston Astros
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 10.7% | 62.0% | 94.2 mph | 29 | 19.6s | -22 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.52 | 0.06 | -0.68 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.56 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.05 | 0.03 | -0.34 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.17 |
Reid Detmers, Los Angeles Angels
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 85 | 12.7% | 64.7% | 94.1 mph | 26 | 19.0s | 16 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.81 | 0.96 | 0.37 | -0.04 | -0.76 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.63 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.76 | -0.03 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.62 |
Minnesota Twins @ Detroit Tigers, 3:40p
Summary
Skip this one unless you’re a completionist: a gNERD of 6.65 puts this matchup at the bottom of today’s slate, mostly because both teams offer little in the way of team-driven excitement and Minnesota still hasn’t named a starter. The Twins’ tNERD is anemic (2.19) with weak baserunning and defense dragging the score down, while the Tigers’ modest tNERD (3.07) is propped up mostly by a big positive “luck” number that hints at some regression potential rather than current fireworks. Framber Valdez is the only real drawing card here — a middling pNERD (3.05) whose xFIP- (~103) and very low swing‑and‑miss profile suggest he’ll limit volatility rather than create it — and he arrived in Detroit on a big contract and has already been in the headlines for a suspension earlier this season. Byron Buxton’s recent day‑to‑day shoulder issue further dulls Minnesota’s upside, and the Twins’ unnamed starter (pNERD = 0) makes the matchup harder to handicap. Short version: low team intrigue + an unknown opposing arm + a contact‑oriented Valdez = low watchability.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.8 | 8.4% | -2.8 | -10.0 | 2.1 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -15.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.29 | 0.21 | -1.05 | -0.93 | -0.74 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -0.94 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.29 | 0.21 | -1.05 | -0.93 | -0.74 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.19 |
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -8.1 | 9.1% | -3.4 | -14.2 | 3.3 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 19.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.30 | 0.76 | -1.25 | -1.30 | -0.66 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.20 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.30 | 0.76 | -1.25 | -1.30 | -0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 3.07 |
Framber Valdez, Detroit Tigers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 9.1% | 65.4% | 94.0 mph | 32 | 19.6s | -2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.23 | -0.67 | 0.66 | -0.08 | 0.84 | 0.56 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.46 | -0.33 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.05 |
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on June 9, 2026