MLB: What to watch on June 12, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Philadelphia Phillies @ Milwaukee Brewers, 4:40p
Summary
High-stakes mismatch that's actually worth watching: Jacob Misiorowski’s flamethrowing dominance makes this the day’s top gNERD (16.37), and Andrew Painter’s shaky season gives the matchup real narrative tension. Misiorowski’s extraordinary strikeout/velocity profile (triple-digit heater, absurd K rates and sub-1.00 WHIP this year) is the engine behind a huge pNERD (13.96), so every two-strike count feels like a highlight opportunity. Painter’s pNERD (5.86) reflects upside—high velocity and youth—but also a high xFIP-/recent bad outing that makes him vulnerable and turns this into a “can the Phillies scratch runs against elite stuff?” puzzle rather than a pitched-ball chess match. Both teams’ tNERDs sit above average (Phillies 6.09, Brewers 6.83), with Milwaukee’s lineup better at generating runs while Philadelphia brings surprising baserunning and a strong bullpen that could keep things interesting late. The matchup is watchable because Misiorowski injects pure action (swing-and-miss), Painter injects volatility, and the supporting offenses/bullpens mean the game can flip quickly—especially if the Phillies’ underperforming offense wakes up.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Philadelphia Phillies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-29.6 |
7.8% |
4.8 |
-0.9 |
32.5 |
$309.8M |
30.5 |
-4.0 |
2.92 |
2.69 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.13 |
-0.26 |
1.47 |
-0.13 |
1.30 |
1.22 |
1.36 |
-0.25 |
1.03 |
0.64 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.13 |
-0.26 |
1.47 |
-0.13 |
1.30 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.52 |
0.32 |
4.00 |
6.09 |
Milwaukee Brewers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
18.7 |
6.9% |
1.3 |
-6.0 |
27.1 |
$139.3M |
27.7 |
-32.0 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.75 |
-1.00 |
0.31 |
-0.56 |
0.94 |
-0.73 |
-1.21 |
-2.00 |
0.53 |
0.37 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.75 |
-1.00 |
0.31 |
-0.56 |
0.94 |
0.73 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
0.27 |
0.18 |
4.00 |
6.83 |
Andrew Painter, Philadelphia Phillies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
113 |
9.6% |
64.3% |
96.3 mph |
23 |
18.5s |
34 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.79 |
-0.43 |
0.25 |
1.01 |
-1.54 |
-0.34 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.57 |
-0.22 |
0.12 |
1.01 |
1.54 |
0.17 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.86 |
Jacob Misiorowski, Milwaukee Brewers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
53 |
16.6% |
66.6% |
100.0 mph |
24 |
19.8s |
-17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-2.65 |
2.77 |
1.13 |
2.76 |
-1.28 |
0.73 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
5.30 |
1.38 |
0.56 |
2.00 |
1.28 |
-0.36 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
13.96 |
Go back to top of page
Miami Marlins @ Pittsburgh Pirates, 3:40p
Summary
A high-quality pitching duel on paper: gNERD 15.15 puts this near the top of today's slate because Braxton Ashcraft's elite underlying stuff meets Sandy Alcántara's ace profile and innings-eating reputation — that contrast makes it worth tuning in. The box-score story is simple: Ashcraft (pNERD 10.99) carries a sub-80 xFIP-, strong strike% and above-average whiff/tempo profile that suggests swing-and-miss upside, while Alcántara (pNERD 5.55) brings elite velo and the kind of long outings that force managerial decisions; both narratives are playing out in their recent starts. The teams themselves punch above the field for watchability (combined tNERD 6.89): Pittsburgh’s offense and baserunning give the game scoring upside, while Miami’s young, aggressive lineup and respectable bullpen depth keep things unpredictable. Given the high average pitcher NERD (8.27) and Ashcraft’s matchup advantages, expect a tactical duel with periodic fireworks — low chance of a slog, higher chance of well-pitched innings that still produce timely offense. If you want pitcher-versus-lineup chess with occasional runs, this one should be toward the top of your queue.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Pittsburgh Pirates (2.01); radio, Pittsburgh Pirates (1.98)
Miami Marlins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-10.2 |
6.3% |
6.3 |
-1.9 |
20.6 |
$81.5M |
27.4 |
0.0 |
1.79 |
1.66 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.37 |
-1.49 |
1.96 |
-0.21 |
0.51 |
-1.39 |
-1.49 |
-0.00 |
-1.17 |
-1.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.37 |
-1.49 |
1.96 |
-0.21 |
0.51 |
1.39 |
1.49 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
7.27 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
21.6 |
8.2% |
5.5 |
-12.6 |
10.3 |
$119.1M |
28.8 |
-5.0 |
2.01 |
1.98 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.87 |
0.07 |
1.70 |
-1.12 |
-0.17 |
-0.96 |
-0.20 |
-0.31 |
-0.74 |
-0.86 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.87 |
0.07 |
1.70 |
-1.12 |
-0.17 |
0.96 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.50 |
Sandy Alcantara, Miami Marlins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
102 |
9.6% |
67.6% |
97.4 mph |
30 |
19.1s |
1 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.16 |
-0.43 |
1.55 |
1.53 |
0.28 |
0.15 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.31 |
-0.22 |
0.77 |
1.53 |
0.00 |
-0.08 |
0.05 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.55 |
Braxton Ashcraft, Pittsburgh Pirates
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
77 |
13.3% |
69.3% |
97.0 mph |
26 |
17.1s |
1 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.27 |
1.26 |
2.21 |
1.34 |
-0.76 |
-1.50 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.55 |
0.63 |
1.11 |
1.34 |
0.76 |
0.75 |
0.05 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
10.99 |
Go back to top of page
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Chicago White Sox, 4:40p
Summary
If you want tidy contrast — a young, high-variance ace against a veteran with shaky peripherals — this is the game to scan; the gNERD (13.59) and strong team NERDs say there’s real watchability even if it probably leans Dodgers. Roki Sasaki’s profile (pNERD 8.12) supplies the headline: a 97+ mph heater, improving results since May and a recent stretch that’s looked a lot better than his early-season box score suggests, so he’s the kind of starter who can produce hard-to-forecast outs and big strikeout spikes. Anthony Kay (pNERD 0.46) offsets that by bringing a much uglier underlying xFIP and fewer swing-and-miss signs, meaning the White Sox will need their surprisingly competent home offense and Rate Field comfort to hang around. The Dodgers’ lofty tNERD (10.04) is driven by elite batting and a top-tier bullpen, while the White Sox’s respectable team marks and home standing keep this from being a pure mismatch; expect a watchable tug-of-war where Sasaki’s heat and the Dodgers’ lineup depth decide whether it’s tense or runaway.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Los Angeles Dodgers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
64.9 |
9.9% |
-2.6 |
19.7 |
28.2 |
$413.5M |
30.0 |
3.0 |
2.45 |
2.51 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
2.55 |
1.47 |
-0.99 |
1.62 |
1.01 |
2.41 |
0.90 |
0.19 |
0.12 |
0.26 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
2.55 |
1.47 |
-0.99 |
1.62 |
1.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.06 |
0.13 |
4.00 |
10.04 |
Chicago White Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
19.7 |
9.2% |
-1.5 |
3.0 |
12.7 |
$105.8M |
27.1 |
4.0 |
1.82 |
2.57 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.79 |
0.89 |
-0.62 |
0.20 |
-0.01 |
-1.11 |
-1.76 |
0.25 |
-1.11 |
0.39 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.79 |
0.89 |
-0.62 |
0.20 |
-0.01 |
1.11 |
1.76 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
4.00 |
8.56 |
Roki Sasaki, Los Angeles Dodgers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
94 |
13.4% |
64.6% |
97.3 mph |
24 |
19.1s |
4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.30 |
1.30 |
0.34 |
1.48 |
-1.28 |
0.15 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.60 |
0.65 |
0.17 |
1.48 |
1.28 |
-0.08 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
8.12 |
Anthony Kay, Chicago White Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
120 |
8.4% |
61.1% |
95.4 mph |
31 |
20.2s |
-15 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.19 |
-0.98 |
-1.05 |
0.58 |
0.54 |
1.06 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-2.38 |
-0.49 |
-0.52 |
0.58 |
0.00 |
-0.53 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
0.46 |
Go back to top of page
Atlanta Braves @ New York Mets, 4:15p
Summary
This is a legitimately watchable game: a 13.02 gNERD sits well above today's average and the historical median, driven by two contrasting storylines — a high-upside rookie arm for the Mets and a boom-or-bust veteran flamethrower for the Braves. The numbers tell the same story: Atlanta's team profile is punchy (7.42 tNERD — strong batting runs, barrel rate and bullpen) while New York's tNERD is lower, but Nolan McLean's pNERD (8.38) jumps out because of a stout xFIP-, youth, and unusually quick pace that suggests swings and misses and short outings; McLean also has a small positive luck signal that hints at upside. Spencer Strider (pNERD 4.70) still brings elite velocity but fewer strikes and a middling xFIP-, so he's less of a sure thing than his reputation; he’s coming off an IL return this year and has been solid but not dominant. The Braves losing Ronald Acuña Jr. to the IL trims some star power and reduces the matchup symmetry, but Atlanta’s offense and bullpen metrics keep this interesting; the clash of McLean’s rookie bite and Strider’s high-variance profile makes this a good pick for viewers who like unpredictable, pitcher-driven drama.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
Atlanta Braves
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
25.8 |
9.4% |
-0.7 |
9.1 |
27.6 |
$249.8M |
30.5 |
-20.0 |
2.36 |
2.36 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.03 |
1.06 |
-0.36 |
0.72 |
0.97 |
0.54 |
1.36 |
-1.25 |
-0.05 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.03 |
1.06 |
-0.36 |
0.72 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
7.42 |
New York Mets
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-39.2 |
9.2% |
-0.3 |
-3.0 |
28.9 |
$374.9M |
29.9 |
-25.0 |
3.32 |
3.05 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.50 |
0.89 |
-0.22 |
-0.31 |
1.06 |
1.97 |
0.85 |
-1.56 |
1.82 |
1.41 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.50 |
0.89 |
-0.22 |
-0.31 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.70 |
4.00 |
5.54 |
Spencer Strider, Atlanta Braves
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
12.5% |
61.6% |
95.3 mph |
27 |
19.1s |
-4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.04 |
0.89 |
-0.83 |
0.53 |
-0.50 |
0.15 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.09 |
0.45 |
-0.41 |
0.53 |
0.50 |
-0.08 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.70 |
Nolan McLean, New York Mets
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
85 |
9.3% |
62.7% |
95.4 mph |
24 |
16.8s |
14 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.82 |
-0.57 |
-0.41 |
0.58 |
-1.28 |
-1.75 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.63 |
-0.28 |
-0.21 |
0.58 |
1.28 |
0.87 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
8.38 |
Go back to top of page
New York Yankees @ Toronto Blue Jays, 4:37p
Summary
This is worth tuning into: a high gNERD driven by Ryan Weathers' strong pNERD and a Yankees lineup that grades out well for loud contact, even if Toronto's team NERD is low and the opponent's pNERD wasn't available in the dataset. Preview packages list Trey Yesavage as Toronto's probable starter, so the "TBD" in the NERD feed looks like a data gap rather than an actual unknown.
The numbers explain why: gNERD 12.86 sits comfortably above today's mean and into the top half historically, with New York's tNERD (8.75) powered by big batting runs and barrel rate—so expect ball-in-play damage—while Toronto's weaker offense and low barrel rate (tNERD 3.41) mute long-ball fireworks. Ryan Weathers' pNERD (8.56) reflects quality peripherals and positive luck in the input, and the box/preview stats show he's been punching out bats this season, so his start is a genuine watchability engine.
In short: pick this one if you want a pitcher-driven game with a dangerous Yankee lineup; skip it if you prefer two evenly matched offenses, since Toronto's team metrics suggest fewer high-leverage offensive moments.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
New York Yankees
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
41.4 |
10.0% |
2.8 |
2.3 |
22.2 |
$337.1M |
29.9 |
-5.0 |
2.08 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.64 |
1.55 |
0.80 |
0.14 |
0.62 |
1.54 |
0.85 |
-0.31 |
-0.61 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.64 |
1.55 |
0.80 |
0.14 |
0.62 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.75 |
Toronto Blue Jays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-14.6 |
6.6% |
-3.4 |
7.9 |
24.3 |
$306.1M |
30.1 |
6.0 |
3.10 |
2.39 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.54 |
-1.24 |
-1.25 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
1.18 |
0.99 |
0.37 |
1.40 |
0.01 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.54 |
-1.24 |
-1.25 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.41 |
Ryan Weathers, New York Yankees
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
77 |
11.1% |
64.1% |
95.0 mph |
26 |
18.9s |
17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.27 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
0.39 |
-0.76 |
-0.01 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.55 |
0.13 |
0.08 |
0.39 |
0.76 |
0.01 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
8.56 |
Go back to top of page
Seattle Mariners @ Washington Nationals, 3:45p
Summary
Watch this if you want to see a live demonstration of an ace-versus-accident-in-waiting: Bryce Miller brings swing-and-miss stuff and recent dominance, while Zack Littell offers a clear path for traffic and, possibly, a long afternoon for the Nats’ pen. Miller’s high pNERD (9.14) matches the eye test — six shutout innings with nine strikeouts in his last outing — and he’s back from an oblique issue that cost him time earlier this year, so his stuff and health story add real flavor. The Nationals profile as the more watchable team here (tNERD 7.63) mostly because of their offense and baserunning, but their bullpen has been alarmingly fragile — a recent blown 9–1 lead is a reminder this game could lurch late. Littell’s negative pNERD (−0.05) tracks with an up-and-down season (rough surface numbers this year), which increases the chances of a quick scoring start for Seattle. Put together: a middling gNERD (10.95) that leans watchable if you like strikeouts, elite stuff, and the possibility of late-inning chaos.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Seattle Mariners (2.35); radio, Seattle Mariners (2.52)
Seattle Mariners
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
21.8 |
8.6% |
-2.4 |
-13.0 |
15.7 |
$196.7M |
28.4 |
17.0 |
2.35 |
2.52 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.87 |
0.40 |
-0.92 |
-1.16 |
0.19 |
-0.07 |
-0.52 |
1.06 |
-0.07 |
0.28 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.87 |
0.40 |
-0.92 |
-1.16 |
0.19 |
0.07 |
0.52 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
4.00 |
5.18 |
Washington Nationals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
22.0 |
9.0% |
4.8 |
-0.3 |
-18.8 |
$114.5M |
27.1 |
-35.0 |
2.00 |
2.20 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.88 |
0.73 |
1.47 |
-0.08 |
-2.10 |
-1.01 |
-1.71 |
-2.19 |
-0.75 |
-0.40 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.88 |
0.73 |
1.47 |
-0.08 |
-2.10 |
1.01 |
1.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
7.63 |
Bryce Miller, Seattle Mariners
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
71 |
13.2% |
69.6% |
96.6 mph |
27 |
22.1s |
-37 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.62 |
1.21 |
2.33 |
1.15 |
-0.50 |
2.63 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
3.24 |
0.61 |
1.16 |
1.15 |
0.50 |
-1.31 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
9.14 |
Zack Littell, Washington Nationals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
126 |
7.0% |
63.6% |
91.5 mph |
30 |
18.8s |
-11 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.53 |
-1.62 |
-0.04 |
-1.27 |
0.28 |
-0.10 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-3.06 |
-0.81 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
-0.05 |
Go back to top of page
San Diego Padres @ Baltimore Orioles, 4:05p
Summary
This is a middling, storyline-driven watch: not a must-see pitcher’s duel, but San Diego’s unusually high team profile and Griffin Canning’s comeback narrative give the game real upside. The gNERD of 10.58 sits basically at the historical median (10.10) and just under the day’s average (10.85), so this is a “pick if you like context” game rather than an automatic primetime grab.
Padres tNERD (8.45) is the real attraction — elite fielding, an above-average bullpen, and strong broadcast interest lift the entertainment floor, while the Orioles are more middle-of-the-road (tNERD 5.42) with weaker defense. The starting pitchers aren’t huge drawcards: both pNERDs are modest (Canning 3.91, Baz 3.36) and their swing-and-miss/strike-rate components are low, so expect contact and ball-in-play action rather than strikeout fireworks. Canning’s story matters — he was recently activated after rehabbing a ruptured Achilles and has shown encouraging results since returning. Shane Baz brings higher velocity and a serviceable season to date (mid-4.00s ERA/4.29, useful strike totals), but not an overpowering profile. In short: watch for defense, bullpen leverage, and Canning’s bounce-back arc; don’t expect a classic pitchers’ duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-42.0 |
8.4% |
1.7 |
18.6 |
39.5 |
$255.5M |
29.9 |
-21.0 |
3.47 |
3.37 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.61 |
0.24 |
0.44 |
1.53 |
1.76 |
0.60 |
0.85 |
-1.31 |
2.12 |
2.09 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.61 |
0.24 |
0.44 |
1.53 |
1.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.06 |
1.04 |
4.00 |
8.45 |
Baltimore Orioles
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
13.5 |
8.6% |
1.4 |
-10.1 |
22.0 |
$214.8M |
29.0 |
-9.0 |
2.82 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.55 |
0.40 |
0.34 |
-0.91 |
0.60 |
0.14 |
-0.02 |
-0.56 |
0.85 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.55 |
0.40 |
0.34 |
-0.91 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.42 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.42 |
Griffin Canning, San Diego Padres
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
97 |
10.0% |
58.7% |
94.2 mph |
30 |
19.0s |
62 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.13 |
-0.25 |
-2.00 |
0.01 |
0.28 |
0.07 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.26 |
-0.12 |
-1.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
-0.03 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.91 |
Shane Baz, Baltimore Orioles
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
104 |
8.7% |
63.8% |
96.1 mph |
27 |
21.1s |
-5 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.27 |
-0.84 |
0.03 |
0.91 |
-0.50 |
1.80 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.54 |
-0.42 |
0.02 |
0.91 |
0.50 |
-0.90 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.36 |
Go back to top of page
Chicago Cubs @ San Francisco Giants, 7:15p
Summary
Worth a tune-in but not must-see: the game’s middling gNERD (10.48) is propped up by a clear pitching contrast — Landen Roupp’s strong underlying profile and brisk pace make him the primary entertainment draw, while Javier Assad’s spot start after a recent recall adds an unpredictable twist. The gNERD sits near the historical median and just below today’s slate average, so expect an ordinary-but-interesting affair rather than an outlier.
Chicago’s high tNERD (8.62) is driven by elite defensive value (+29.2 fielding runs) and decent broadcast appeal, while San Francisco’s low team score (2.71) masks a big positive Luck number (21.0), which — per the luck rule — suggests the Giants may be underperforming and could bounce back. Roupp’s pNERD (7.38) reflects a solid xFIP- (~81), hefty strikeout upside and a very quick tempo, the kind that can produce strikeout-heavy, watchable innings. Assad (pNERD 2.25) is the wildcard: he was just recalled and threw 6 1/3 scoreless in relief in this series, so he can either keep things tidy or force the Cubs into a longer bullpen day. Given the matchup, this is a game you pick for Roupp’s arsenal and the Cubs’ defense — not a headline show, but one where action and quick innings are likely.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
Chicago Cubs
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
18.2 |
7.9% |
0.7 |
29.2 |
2.3 |
$246.2M |
29.8 |
13.0 |
3.01 |
3.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.73 |
-0.18 |
0.11 |
2.43 |
-0.70 |
0.50 |
0.67 |
0.81 |
1.22 |
1.62 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.73 |
-0.18 |
0.11 |
2.43 |
-0.70 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.81 |
0.61 |
0.81 |
4.00 |
8.62 |
San Francisco Giants
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
10.4 |
6.9% |
-5.5 |
-9.4 |
-5.2 |
$228.3M |
29.6 |
21.0 |
3.20 |
3.49 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.43 |
-1.00 |
-1.95 |
-0.85 |
-1.20 |
0.29 |
0.49 |
1.31 |
1.59 |
2.34 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.43 |
-1.00 |
-1.95 |
-0.85 |
-1.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.31 |
0.79 |
1.17 |
4.00 |
2.71 |
Javier Assad, Chicago Cubs
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
108 |
5.5% |
62.0% |
93.1 mph |
28 |
18.2s |
8 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.50 |
-2.31 |
-0.67 |
-0.51 |
-0.24 |
-0.59 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.00 |
-1.15 |
-0.33 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
0.30 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.25 |
Landen Roupp, San Francisco Giants
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
81 |
10.2% |
60.4% |
93.3 mph |
27 |
16.9s |
18 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.05 |
-0.16 |
-1.33 |
-0.42 |
-0.50 |
-1.67 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.09 |
-0.08 |
-0.66 |
0.00 |
0.50 |
0.83 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.38 |
Go back to top of page
Texas Rangers @ Boston Red Sox, 4:10p
Summary
Not must-see, but not snooze-worthy: this is a middling, pitcher-focused game where one young power arm meets a steady veteran—fun if you like velocity and sequencing more than fireworks. Jack Leiter’s strong pNERD (6.51) and above-average velocity make him the primary reason to tune in, while Sonny Gray’s veteran steadiness (pNERD 3.34) and solid underlying numbers keep the outcome from feeling random. Leiter’s profile shows genuine strike-ability and positive luck that suggests better results could be coming, while Gray pairs a good xFIP (better than league average) with a low swing‑and‑miss profile and slow pace that can sap excitement but rewards pitchers’ duels; both probable starters are listed in previews. The game gNERD of 10.20 sits almost exactly at the historical median and a hair below today’s mean, so it’s average by the numbers. Team-wise, Boston’s defense (high fielding runs) and both clubs’ positive “luck” figures hint at offensive bounce-backs, but the Rangers’ weak barrel rate and Boston’s anemic batting runs depress long-ball potential—expect a tense, pitched contest rather than a slugfest.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Texas Rangers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-4.1 |
7.7% |
-0.2 |
2.4 |
19.8 |
$201.9M |
30.3 |
16.0 |
2.01 |
2.08 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.13 |
-0.34 |
-0.19 |
0.15 |
0.46 |
-0.01 |
1.17 |
1.00 |
-0.74 |
-0.65 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.13 |
-0.34 |
-0.19 |
0.15 |
0.46 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
4.95 |
Boston Red Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-32.5 |
7.2% |
2.0 |
18.3 |
19.0 |
$263.6M |
29.2 |
13.0 |
2.47 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.24 |
-0.75 |
0.54 |
1.50 |
0.40 |
0.70 |
0.17 |
0.81 |
0.16 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.24 |
-0.75 |
0.54 |
1.50 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.81 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
5.61 |
Jack Leiter, Texas Rangers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
97 |
11.4% |
63.6% |
96.6 mph |
26 |
20.1s |
17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.13 |
0.39 |
-0.04 |
1.15 |
-0.76 |
0.98 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.26 |
0.20 |
-0.02 |
1.15 |
0.76 |
-0.49 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.51 |
Sonny Gray, Boston Red Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
93 |
9.3% |
63.5% |
92.1 mph |
36 |
21.0s |
-19 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.36 |
-0.57 |
-0.07 |
-0.98 |
1.85 |
1.72 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.72 |
-0.28 |
-0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.86 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.34 |
Go back to top of page
St. Louis Cardinals @ Minnesota Twins, 5:10p
Summary
Watch if you like a tempo-and-penalty game: Joe Ryan’s steadiness and a Cardinals roster built on defense, speed and youth promise action without fireworks. The matchup is a classic contrast — Ryan brings the nicer underlying profile (he’s been one of Minnesota’s steadier starters this season) while Kyle Leahy is the more hittable but brisk-paced arm whose quick tempo can keep things moving.
gNERD (9.68) lands below the day’s mean, but the components tell the story: St. Louis’ high tNERD reflects above-average fielding and baserunning that create outs and extra-base opportunities, whereas Minnesota’s low tNERD signals a lineup currently failing to manufacture excitement. Joe Ryan’s strong strike‑rate and solid surface metrics (pNERD 6.14) make him the primary draw; Leahy (pNERD 3.12) offers quick innings and the occasional hiccup that can flip a game.
Recent context nudges interest down a notch — Minnesota just absorbed a lopsided loss — so this is a watch for fans who prefer tidy pitching matchups, crisp defense, and fast pace over sluggers and high‑octane scoring.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, St. Louis Cardinals (2.15)
St. Louis Cardinals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
7.5 |
7.8% |
2.4 |
10.2 |
6.1 |
$111.2M |
26.9 |
0.0 |
2.17 |
2.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.32 |
-0.26 |
0.67 |
0.81 |
-0.45 |
-1.05 |
-1.94 |
-0.00 |
-0.43 |
-0.50 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.32 |
-0.26 |
0.67 |
0.81 |
-0.45 |
1.05 |
1.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.09 |
Minnesota Twins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-8.8 |
8.2% |
-2.7 |
-10.5 |
1.4 |
$122.1M |
28.9 |
-13.0 |
2.30 |
2.06 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.32 |
0.07 |
-1.02 |
-0.94 |
-0.76 |
-0.92 |
-0.06 |
-0.81 |
-0.17 |
-0.69 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.32 |
0.07 |
-1.02 |
-0.94 |
-0.76 |
0.92 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.02 |
Kyle Leahy, St. Louis Cardinals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
105 |
8.5% |
61.6% |
93.8 mph |
29 |
17.3s |
4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.33 |
-0.93 |
-0.83 |
-0.18 |
0.02 |
-1.33 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.66 |
-0.47 |
-0.42 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.67 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.12 |
Joe Ryan, Minnesota Twins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
86 |
11.2% |
67.9% |
93.2 mph |
30 |
19.3s |
-13 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.76 |
0.30 |
1.65 |
-0.46 |
0.28 |
0.32 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.52 |
0.15 |
0.83 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.14 |
Go back to top of page
Colorado Rockies @ Athletics, 7:05p
Summary
Not a must-watch by the numbers, but there’s a live storyline: Oakland’s Gage Jump has been rolling lately and the A’s big positive “luck” suggests they’re overdue to look better than their box scores—enough to make this a keep-an-eye-on game. The gNERD (9.68) sits a touch below today’s average, and the matchup is driven more by team profiles than starter matchups: Colorado’s tNERD is painfully low (2.65) — a lineup with terrible batting runs and a tiny barrel rate — while Oakland’s tNERD (6.70) gets lift from a decent offense and a surprisingly productive bullpen. Both listed starters show pNERD = 0 here (no pitcher component), so there’s extra uncertainty, but previews list Gage Jump as Oakland’s probable starter and note his recent strong run (2-1, 2.45 ERA, 18.1 IP and a 6 1/3-scoreless outing in his last start). The A’s large positive “Luck” (z ≈ 1.68) implies they may soon outperform their record, which lifts watchability; if Jump eats innings and the A’s corrections materialize, the game can be quietly entertaining — otherwise it risks becoming a grind.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Colorado Rockies (1.73); radio, Athletics (1.94)
Colorado Rockies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-40.7 |
6.7% |
-0.2 |
-2.7 |
17.6 |
$134.1M |
29.5 |
12.0 |
1.73 |
1.80 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.56 |
-1.16 |
-0.19 |
-0.28 |
0.31 |
-0.79 |
0.44 |
0.75 |
-1.29 |
-1.25 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.56 |
-1.16 |
-0.19 |
-0.28 |
0.31 |
0.79 |
0.00 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.65 |
Athletics
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
7.8 |
8.7% |
-2.2 |
-10.9 |
21.4 |
$135.2M |
28.2 |
27.0 |
1.27 |
1.94 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.33 |
0.48 |
-0.85 |
-0.98 |
0.56 |
-0.77 |
-0.71 |
1.68 |
-2.19 |
-0.95 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.33 |
0.48 |
-0.85 |
-0.98 |
0.56 |
0.77 |
0.71 |
1.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.70 |
Gage Jump, Athletics
No detailed stats available
Go back to top of page
Detroit Tigers @ Cleveland Guardians, 4:10p
Summary
Not a can’t-miss pitching duel, but there’s enough unevenness here to make it watchable: Cleveland’s higher tNERD (7.26) promises bullpen angles and a young roster edge, while both starters grade as mediocre pNERD types — which often makes for a volatile, swingy game. The gNERD (8.96) is below today’s mean, so don’t expect an analytic masterpiece; the Guardians’ team profile (youth, low payroll but a loud bullpen) injects intrigue, and their home broadcast/radio draw helps the spectacle. Jack Flaherty’s underlying numbers suggest some bad luck (his peripherals have been better than his results), so his 3.55 pNERD and big positive luck point to a plausible bounce-back outing rather than sustained dominance — think hit-limited but not overpowering. Tanner Bibee has been oddly winless despite several quality-type starts this season, so his 3.60 pNERD buys you length but not strikeout fireworks; that combination often leads to tense middle innings and bullpen activity. Practically: pick this one if you like low-K, high-leverage drama and roster storylines; skip it if you want a pure strikeout duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Detroit Tigers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-2.9 |
9.2% |
-3.2 |
-15.5 |
4.6 |
$239.2M |
29.6 |
19.0 |
2.74 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.09 |
0.89 |
-1.18 |
-1.37 |
-0.55 |
0.42 |
0.58 |
1.18 |
0.69 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.09 |
0.89 |
-1.18 |
-1.37 |
-0.55 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.18 |
0.34 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
3.50 |
Cleveland Guardians
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-16.7 |
6.2% |
1.9 |
2.3 |
27.8 |
$88.9M |
27.6 |
6.0 |
2.16 |
3.14 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.62 |
-1.57 |
0.51 |
0.14 |
0.99 |
-1.30 |
-1.35 |
0.37 |
-0.44 |
1.60 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.62 |
-1.57 |
0.51 |
0.14 |
0.99 |
1.30 |
1.35 |
0.37 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
4.00 |
7.26 |
Jack Flaherty, Detroit Tigers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
106 |
10.4% |
60.8% |
92.5 mph |
30 |
18.6s |
21 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.39 |
-0.07 |
-1.14 |
-0.80 |
0.28 |
-0.26 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.77 |
-0.03 |
-0.57 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.13 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.55 |
Tanner Bibee, Cleveland Guardians
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
101 |
11.5% |
63.4% |
94.1 mph |
27 |
20.5s |
-2 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.10 |
0.44 |
-0.13 |
-0.04 |
-0.50 |
1.31 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.20 |
0.22 |
-0.07 |
0.00 |
0.50 |
-0.65 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.60 |
Go back to top of page
Tampa Bay Rays @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
Not must-see TV: the game’s gNERD of 7.26 sits well below today’s average, so don’t expect fireworks — but it’s worth tuning in if you want Shane McClanahan doing McClanahan things against a pitchable lefty making a spot start. Shane’s strong pNERD (6.57) lines up with his mid-90s four-seam and heavy ground-ball profile, so this is a control-and-movement outing more than a high-strikeout showcase. Sam Aldegheri (pNERD 0) is essentially an unknown in this model because he’s newly inserted into the rotation; scouting and Statcast profiles call him a pitchability lefty with a four‑pitch mix rather than blow‑away velocity, which usually means low‑event games unless sequencing breaks down. The teams’ tNERDs are weak (Rays 2.44, Angels 0.52; average 1.48), reflecting poor fielding and thin offensive barrel rates on both sides, so there’s low upside for a back‑and‑forth showdown. Given the numbers and the matchup, prioritize this for quality starting‑pitching fans who enjoy strategy and movement, not for viewers chasing offensive action.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Tampa Bay Rays (2.10)
Tampa Bay Rays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
6.9 |
5.3% |
2.5 |
-8.9 |
-0.8 |
$106.9M |
29.1 |
6.0 |
2.27 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.29 |
-2.31 |
0.71 |
-0.81 |
-0.91 |
-1.10 |
0.07 |
0.37 |
-0.23 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.29 |
-2.31 |
0.71 |
-0.81 |
-0.91 |
1.10 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.44 |
Los Angeles Angels
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-12.5 |
9.4% |
-5.1 |
-20.8 |
-4.6 |
$191.6M |
28.6 |
-9.0 |
2.59 |
2.01 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.46 |
1.06 |
-1.81 |
-1.82 |
-1.16 |
-0.13 |
-0.39 |
-0.56 |
0.40 |
-0.80 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.46 |
1.06 |
-1.81 |
-1.82 |
-1.16 |
0.13 |
0.39 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
0.52 |
Shane McClanahan, Tampa Bay Rays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
91 |
11.7% |
65.3% |
95.3 mph |
29 |
17.2s |
-23 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.47 |
0.53 |
0.63 |
0.53 |
0.02 |
-1.42 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.95 |
0.26 |
0.31 |
0.53 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.57 |
Sam Aldegheri, Los Angeles Angels
No detailed stats available
Go back to top of page
Arizona Diamondbacks @ Cincinnati Reds, 4:15p
Summary
Low-priority game: gNERD 7.03 sits near the bottom of today’s slate, and the matchup offers more storyline than spectacle. Eduardo Rodríguez is the steadier arm on paper — a 5‑2 season and an ERA ~2.5 — but he’s not blowing hitters away, and his peripherals here (low swinging‑strike and below‑average velo in the NERD inputs) argue against a strikeout-heavy outing. Nick Lodolo’s return from a spring blister and rehab work has been talked up, but his season numbers and control have been shaky (higher ERA and walk issues), which makes him a live‑or‑die piece rather than must‑see pitching. The Reds are also missing Elly De La Cruz on the IL, which dulls the lineup’s ceiling even as their bullpen has been a real strength — that combination favors a low‑scoring, managerial chess match more than an action-packed slugfest. Given Arizona’s weak barrel/batting profile but strong fielding and Cincinnati’s top‑end batted‑ball power, this feels like a grind: worth tuning in if you care about bullpen usage, Lodolo’s health story, or matchup tweaks, but not a priority for high‑octane entertainment.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Arizona Diamondbacks (2.19); radio, Cincinnati Reds (2.11)
Arizona Diamondbacks
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-24.2 |
7.2% |
0.9 |
15.0 |
15.9 |
$231.6M |
30.2 |
-15.0 |
2.19 |
1.92 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.92 |
-0.75 |
0.17 |
1.22 |
0.20 |
0.33 |
1.08 |
-0.94 |
-0.39 |
-0.99 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.92 |
-0.75 |
0.17 |
1.22 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.93 |
Cincinnati Reds
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-19.5 |
9.9% |
1.1 |
-1.4 |
-13.7 |
$147.4M |
28.0 |
11.0 |
2.09 |
2.11 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.73 |
1.47 |
0.24 |
-0.17 |
-1.76 |
-0.63 |
-0.94 |
0.68 |
-0.59 |
-0.59 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.73 |
1.47 |
0.24 |
-0.17 |
-1.76 |
0.63 |
0.94 |
0.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.30 |
Eduardo Rodriguez, Arizona Diamondbacks
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
102 |
7.7% |
63.3% |
92.0 mph |
33 |
18.3s |
-42 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.16 |
-1.30 |
-0.18 |
-1.03 |
1.07 |
-0.51 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.31 |
-0.65 |
-0.09 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.00 |
Nick Lodolo, Cincinnati Reds
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
120 |
9.7% |
64.1% |
94.2 mph |
28 |
19.1s |
7 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.19 |
-0.39 |
0.17 |
0.01 |
-0.24 |
0.15 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-2.38 |
-0.19 |
0.08 |
0.01 |
0.24 |
-0.08 |
0.35 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
1.84 |
Go back to top of page
Houston Astros @ Kansas City Royals, 5:10p
Summary
Low-stakes box score alert: this rates as the least watchable game on the board today — starting staffs and team metrics both sit well below typical NERD thresholds. Still, there are storylines to keep an eye on: Tatsuya Imai’s uneven command and comeback arc after a brief IL stint (and his role in a combined no-hitter in late May) make him a pitcher worth watching for volatility. The gNERD (6.96) mostly reflects mediocre team profiles (Astros tNERD 3.16, Royals 4.13) and uninspiring pNERDs (Imai 2.81, Avila 3.82), so expect limited high-leverage fireworks; both bullpens are glaring weaknesses in the NERD components, which lowers late-inning drama. Imai’s underlying metrics show poor strike% and a high xFIP- but also big positive luck — that suggests his results have been worse than his peripherals imply, so a cleaner outing is plausible. Luinder Avila is the younger, higher-velocity arm who’s been up-and-down in early MLB work, giving this game a modest pitcher-contrast narrative but not enough to overcome the low overall watchability.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Houston Astros
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
7.5 |
8.6% |
-1.6 |
0.9 |
-6.3 |
$232.7M |
28.9 |
3.0 |
2.17 |
1.99 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.32 |
0.40 |
-0.65 |
0.02 |
-1.27 |
0.34 |
-0.16 |
0.19 |
-0.42 |
-0.84 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.32 |
0.40 |
-0.65 |
0.02 |
-1.27 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.19 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.16 |
Kansas City Royals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-29.5 |
8.4% |
2.7 |
7.4 |
-11.3 |
$184.5M |
29.7 |
17.0 |
2.11 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.12 |
0.24 |
0.77 |
0.58 |
-1.60 |
-0.21 |
0.62 |
1.06 |
-0.54 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.12 |
0.24 |
0.77 |
0.58 |
-1.60 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
4.13 |
Tatsuya Imai, Houston Astros
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
109 |
12.1% |
58.9% |
94.8 mph |
28 |
20.5s |
17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.56 |
0.71 |
-1.93 |
0.30 |
-0.24 |
1.31 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.12 |
0.36 |
-0.96 |
0.30 |
0.24 |
-0.65 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.81 |
Luinder Avila, Kansas City Royals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
110 |
8.6% |
59.4% |
96.4 mph |
24 |
18.4s |
-16 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.62 |
-0.89 |
-1.71 |
1.06 |
-1.28 |
-0.43 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.23 |
-0.44 |
-0.86 |
1.06 |
1.28 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.82 |
Go back to top of page