MLB: What to watch on June 16, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Toronto Blue Jays @ Boston Red Sox, 3:45p
Summary
High watchability: elite swing-and-miss ceiling from Dylan Cease meets real rookie intrigue in Payton Tolle, producing a gNERD (14.86) that sits well above typical games. The matchup pairs a true finisher (Cease’s stuff/velocity and monstrous pNERD) against a hard-throwing, highly ranked lefty prospect whose early big-league flashes make every inning unpredictable.
The NERD breakdown explains the appeal: a very high average-pitcher NERD (10.29) driven by Cease’s 11.67 (97.6 mph velo, elite swing-and-miss) and Tolle’s strong 8.92 (youth and prospect upside). The teams push watchability unevenly — Toronto’s batting profile is weak while Boston’s fielding and marginally better team NERD add defense-driven intrigue and run-prevention storylines. Cease’s arrival and recent activation amplify interest, while Tolle’s May/seamless climb through the minors means he can both miss bats and occasionally be hittable.
Bottom line: if you prioritize strikeouts, velocity, and a high-upside rookie subplot, this ranks near the top of the day; if you want steady, even offensive fireworks, lower your expectations.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -13.5 | 6.5% | -3.5 | 5.8 | 23.9 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 10.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.50 | -1.26 | -1.20 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.59 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.50 | -1.26 | -1.20 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.49 |
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -29.2 | 7.0% | 2.3 | 17.5 | 21.3 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 12.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.10 | -0.86 | 0.59 | 1.44 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.10 | -0.86 | 0.59 | 1.44 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 5.63 |
Dylan Cease, Toronto Blue Jays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 58 | 16.0% | 61.9% | 97.6 mph | 30 | 18.9s | 11 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -2.39 | 2.54 | -0.72 | 1.62 | 0.28 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 4.78 | 1.27 | -0.36 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 11.67 |
Payton Tolle, Boston Red Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 93 | 12.5% | 69.6% | 95.8 mph | 23 | 17.8s | -32 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.37 | 0.91 | 2.32 | 0.76 | -1.54 | -0.92 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.73 | 0.46 | 1.16 | 0.76 | 1.54 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.92 |
Chicago White Sox @ New York Yankees, 4:05p
Summary
A legitimately watchable pitching-versus-power match: Davis Martin's quietly excellent season meets a Yankees lineup that can punish mistakes, while Gerrit Cole's comeback arc adds narrative spice even if his underlying numbers look shaky. Martin's 2026 run has been the real deal — the White Sox have ridden him to wins and he owns strong surface and skill metrics this year, making his high pNERD (8.01) meaningful.
The Yankees bring a heavy offensive profile that explains their lofty team NERD; their barrel rate and batting production make every mistake dangerous, so this isn't a pitcher-only snooze.
Gerrit Cole's return from the injured list is the headline subplot: his velocity looks back and that pedigree matters, but his pNERD (4.09) and peripheral indicators in the card suggest he’s more hittable than his name implies — a storyline that favors swing-and-miss Martin vs. run-managing Cole.
Given a lofty gNERD (14.80, in the upper tail historically) this game is worth prioritizing for viewers who like tidy contrast: a stingy, young White Sox ace vs. a veteran Yankee lineup and a returning ace trying to reassert himself.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Yankees (2.08); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 15.5 | 9.1% | -1.2 | 3.5 | 13.4 | $105.8M | 27.1 | -1.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.63 | 0.84 | -0.49 | 0.30 | 0.01 | -1.11 | -1.76 | -0.06 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.63 | 0.84 | -0.49 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.34 |
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 39.5 | 10.0% | 3.9 | 2.8 | 24.9 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -7.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.08 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.42 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.08 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9.16 |
Davis Martin, Chicago White Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 75 | 12.6% | 66.0% | 93.7 mph | 29 | 17.8s | -18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.41 | 0.96 | 0.91 | -0.23 | 0.02 | -0.92 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.81 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.01 |
Gerrit Cole, New York Yankees
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 109 | 6.9% | 69.2% | 96.7 mph | 35 | 19.0s | -50 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -1.68 | 2.17 | 1.19 | 1.58 | 0.05 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.12 | -0.84 | 1.09 | 1.19 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.09 |
Miami Marlins @ Philadelphia Phillies, 3:40p
Summary
Watch this for Luzardo — he’s the game’s engine: a high-pNERD ace with strike stuff and recent form that makes this matchup feel like it could tilt into a pitcher’s duel, even if the rest of the box score threatens otherwise. The gNERD of 13.61 sits well above the daily average and is driven almost entirely by Jesús Luzardo’s 10.20 pNERD (excellent xFIP-, plus good velocity, chase/whiff profile, and positive luck), while Tyler Phillips’ 4.36 pNERD and spotty track record make him a classic underdog starter who could hand the game over to the pen. Luzardo’s recent splits and the team preview suggest he’s handled this opponent and settled some early-season bumps, while Phillips is still carving out rotation work for Miami. Team-side, the Marlins’ youth, baserunning and cheaper payroll add upside for small-ball excitement; the Phillies bring a taxed-but-deep bullpen and stronger broadcasters that keep the game engaging even if the offense is quiet. In short: tune in for top-end pitching and feel-good underdog variables — the pitcher narrative and matchups are the day’s real draw.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -13.3 | 6.1% | 4.9 | 0.7 | 22.4 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 2.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.49 | -1.58 | 1.39 | 0.07 | 0.57 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 0.12 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.49 | -1.58 | 1.39 | 0.07 | 0.57 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.94 |
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -35.6 | 7.7% | 5.4 | -3.5 | 33.5 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -8.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.35 | -0.29 | 1.54 | -0.28 | 1.26 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.48 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.35 | -0.29 | 1.54 | -0.28 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 5.72 |
Tyler Phillips, Miami Marlins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 106 | 11.9% | 62.6% | 96.1 mph | 28 | 18.7s | -62 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.47 | 0.91 | -0.24 | -0.19 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.77 | 0.32 | -0.23 | 0.91 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.36 |
Jesús Luzardo, Philadelphia Phillies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 76 | 13.5% | 63.6% | 96.7 mph | 28 | 17.4s | 27 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.35 | 1.38 | -0.07 | 1.19 | -0.24 | -1.24 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.70 | 0.69 | -0.04 | 1.19 | 0.24 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.20 |
Tampa Bay Rays @ Los Angeles Dodgers, 7:10p
Summary
This is a pitchers-versus-lineup showdown: Rasmussen is the real hook — his peripherals scream ace — while the Dodgers’ beefy lineup and high tNERD make this the more watchable contest overall. Rasmussen’s elite pNERD (8.77) and a 68 xFIP- suggest he’s pitching well beneath his expected run environment, so he’s the pitcher most likely to drive a low-scoring, technically satisfying duel; he’s also coming off a brief paternity absence and a string of scoreless, long outings that make him legitimately dangerous. The Dodgers, by contrast, bring a top-tier team profile (tNERD 10.35) — lots of barrels and above-average fielding — and their rookie-ish lefty Justin Wrobleski (pNERD 4.39) profiles as a contact-oriented arm with worse peripherals (higher xFIP-, low whiff rate) who recently exited a start with a hamstring scare but is expected to pitch. That mismatch — an excellent Rays starter versus a lineup-first Dodgers club and an innings-eating but whiff-poor Dodger starter — plus a gNERD of 12.97 (above both today’s mean and the historical mean) makes this a strong “priority watch” for fans who prefer smart pitching against a threatening offense.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 3.4 | 5.4% | 3.1 | -13.9 | -0.6 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 8.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.16 | -2.15 | 0.83 | -1.13 | -0.87 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.48 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.16 | -2.15 | 0.83 | -1.13 | -0.87 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.42 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 66.5 | 10.0% | -2.2 | 17.7 | 28.9 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 6.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.60 | 1.56 | -0.80 | 1.46 | 0.98 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.60 | 1.56 | -0.80 | 1.46 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.35 |
Drew Rasmussen, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 68 | 10.9% | 65.7% | 95.8 mph | 30 | 18.7s | -4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.81 | 0.17 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.28 | -0.19 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 3.62 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.77 |
Justin Wrobleski, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 7.9% | 66.3% | 94.0 mph | 25 | 16.7s | -39 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.62 | -1.22 | 1.02 | -0.09 | -1.02 | -1.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.23 | -0.61 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.39 |
Cleveland Guardians @ Milwaukee Brewers, 4:40p
Summary
This is a legitimately watchable game on paper: a gNERD of 12.37 sits above today's mean (10.70) and nudges past the historical 75th percentile (12.00), driven by two above‑average team NERDs and a nice contrast in pitcher profiles. The Guardians' tNERD (7.69) and Brewers' tNERD (7.40) both punch above the daily field, meaning there should be lineup and bullpen ingredients for action even if both teams' barrel rates are subdued. Slade Cecconi (pNERD 4.66) is the steadier story — he's shown improved secondary‑pitch results and recent quality outings for Cleveland, making him a reasonable bet to eat innings and keep the game competitive. Robert Gasser (pNERD 0.00) registers no detailed metric in this sheet, and recent reports show a pitcher with limited MLB work since Tommy John who can swing between efficient strikes and control hiccups; that volatility is what raises the entertainment upside. In short: pick this one if you like tidy, analytic pitching matchups that can flip into chaos when the less‑tested arm loses command.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Milwaukee Brewers (2.66); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -18.7 | 6.1% | 2.8 | 2.3 | 30.9 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 8.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.70 | -1.58 | 0.74 | 0.20 | 1.10 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.48 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.70 | -1.58 | 0.74 | 0.20 | 1.10 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 7.69 |
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 23.1 | 7.0% | 2.1 | -6.7 | 28.7 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -32.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.92 | -0.86 | 0.53 | -0.54 | 0.96 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -1.91 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.92 | -0.86 | 0.53 | -0.54 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 7.40 |
Slade Cecconi, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 99 | 8.9% | 63.7% | 93.3 mph | 27 | 19.3s | 17 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.02 | -0.75 | -0.01 | -0.42 | -0.50 | 0.30 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.04 | -0.38 | -0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | -0.15 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.66 |
Robert Gasser, Milwaukee Brewers
No detailed stats available
Pittsburgh Pirates @ Athletics, 6:40p
Summary
Watch if you like high-upside pitching duels with volatility: Jack Perkins’ heat and swing‑and‑miss stuff make this more interesting than the raw records suggest, and Mitch Keller’s surface results have been worse than his peripherals imply. The gNERD of 12.25 sits above both the historic median and today’s average, driven by two tidy team NERDs and a big split between a high‑pNERD Perkins (8.04) and a middling Keller (3.52). Perkins has been shuffled between the ‘pen and rotation this year and was recently inserted into a starting role after a recall, showing the velocity and chase numbers that underlie his pNERD despite a higher ERA in limited innings. Keller, by contrast, has had stretches of quality but a recent regression in results noted by coverage; his low swinging‑strike profile explains the smaller pNERD, yet his positive “luck” component suggests some regression toward better outings. Bottom line: Perkins offers upside and strikeout action; Keller’s matchup is watchable if you’re hoping his peripherals catch up — that contrast is the day’s entertainment.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Pittsburgh Pirates (2.01); radio, Pittsburgh Pirates (1.98)
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 17.2 | 8.1% | 6.4 | -13.4 | 11.4 | $119.1M | 28.8 | -1.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.69 | 0.03 | 1.85 | -1.09 | -0.12 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.06 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.69 | 0.03 | 1.85 | -1.09 | -0.12 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.52 |
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 19.6 | 8.6% | -3.1 | -15.2 | 19.1 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 28.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.79 | 0.43 | -1.08 | -1.24 | 0.36 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 1.67 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.79 | 0.43 | -1.08 | -1.24 | 0.36 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.42 |
Mitch Keller, Pittsburgh Pirates
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 106 | 8.5% | 63.8% | 93.1 mph | 30 | 18.6s | 16 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.38 | -0.94 | 0.04 | -0.51 | 0.28 | -0.27 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.77 | -0.47 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.52 |
Jack Perkins, Athletics
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 95 | 13.7% | 66.7% | 96.3 mph | 26 | 19.8s | 49 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.25 | 1.47 | 1.17 | 1.00 | -0.76 | 0.70 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.50 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.76 | -0.35 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.04 |
San Diego Padres @ St. Louis Cardinals, 4:45p
Summary
This is more of a slow-burn watcher than a must-see: two high-tNERD clubs and a loud Padres bullpen/defense make the game feel important, but the starting pitchers profile as contact-oriented innings-eaters rather than strikeout artists. The gNERD of 11.98 sits above both the historical mean (10.11) and today's average (10.70), driven almost entirely by strong team NERDs (Padres 8.49, Cardinals 8.38) rather than electric pNERDs. San Diego's defensive runs and an unusually positive bullpen component tilt the matchup toward low-event, late-inning leverage — that bullpen is a real watchability engine even if the Padres' offense has underperformed. Michael King and Andre Pallante post middling underlying numbers (xFIP-ish profiles and limited swing-and-miss), with Pallante carrying a bit more velocity and King owning a solid prior outing against St. Louis; both are better bets to hand the game to their bullpens than to finish deep with dominance. If you like strategic, defense-and-bullpen baseball (and decent broadcast presentation), this is one to catch; if you want high strikeout/homer theatrics, look elsewhere.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -45.1 | 8.4% | 1.8 | 18.5 | 43.3 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -25.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.72 | 0.27 | 0.43 | 1.53 | 1.88 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -1.49 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.72 | 0.27 | 0.43 | 1.53 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.49 |
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 12.3 | 7.9% | 2.6 | 12.4 | 2.3 | $111.2M | 26.9 | -1.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.50 | -0.13 | 0.68 | 1.03 | -0.69 | -1.05 | -1.94 | -0.06 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.50 | -0.13 | 0.68 | 1.03 | -0.69 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 8.38 |
Michael King, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 101 | 10.6% | 62.2% | 93.3 mph | 31 | 18.4s | -14 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.61 | -0.42 | 0.54 | -0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.19 | 0.02 | -0.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.53 |
Andre Pallante, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 9.1% | 63.3% | 95.2 mph | 27 | 20.2s | -6 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.15 | -0.66 | -0.16 | 0.48 | -0.50 | 1.02 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.31 | -0.33 | -0.08 | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.56 |
Colorado Rockies @ Chicago Cubs, 5:05p
Summary
Not must-see but worth a peek: Chicago’s elite defense and Edward Cabrera’s return-from-IL heat give this matchup some teeth, but Colorado’s anemic offense and Ryan Feltner’s fragile comeback cap the upside. Cabrera looks like the main attraction — higher pNERD, plus-plus velocity and a recent activation after a blister/IL stint that the Cubs used to iron his stuff back out — so his start raises the game’s ceiling. Feltner’s pNERD is low and his peripherals here (poor strike% and minimal whiff profile) suggest he’s more likely to produce contact and short outings; he’s been on and off the IL this spring but was recently reinstated to make starts for Colorado. Team-wise the gap is stark: Chicago’s 9.20 tNERD is driven by elite fielding and surprisingly positive “luck,” whereas Colorado’s 1.95 is held down by miserable batting and barrel rates — that combo points to a pitchers’-duel-ish texture but with the Cubs safer to score on mistakes. The gNERD (10.25) sits near the long-run median, so expect a tidy, watchable game if you like high-spin/swing-and-miss stuff from Cabrera and crisp defense behind him.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.6 | 6.7% | -1.4 | -5.6 | 14.1 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 7.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.20 | -1.10 | -0.55 | -0.45 | 0.05 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.42 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.20 | -1.10 | -0.55 | -0.45 | 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1.95 |
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.7 | 8.0% | 1.6 | 28.2 | 0.5 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 18.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.87 | -0.05 | 0.37 | 2.32 | -0.80 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 1.07 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.87 | -0.05 | 0.37 | 2.32 | -0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 9.20 |
Ryan Feltner, Colorado Rockies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 10.1% | 60.9% | 94.7 mph | 29 | 18.8s | 0 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.62 | -0.20 | -1.12 | 0.24 | 0.02 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.23 | -0.10 | -0.56 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.21 |
Edward Cabrera, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 93 | 12.0% | 62.0% | 96.2 mph | 28 | 17.9s | 26 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.37 | 0.68 | -0.69 | 0.95 | -0.24 | -0.83 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.73 | 0.34 | -0.34 | 0.95 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.14 |
Kansas City Royals @ Washington Nationals, 3:45p
Summary
Watch if you want a comfortably average game with one team doing the heavy lifting: the gNERD sits essentially at league-norm (10.02), but that number is propped up by a Nationals lineup and Foster Griffin’s steadier profile rather than by the Royals. The Nationals’ tNERD advantage comes from genuine offensive impulses (good batting and baserunning components) while Kansas City grades out weakly overall and relies on a luck bump; Washington’s lineup should present a tougher test than most Wacha’s faced. Michael Wacha and Foster Griffin are both usable — Wacha has been a middle-of-the-rotation veteran who pounds the zone, while Griffin’s surface metrics (record and peripheral numbers) look a touch cleaner this year — so expect a pitchers’ duel that leans toward the Nats’ lineup getting more chances. The Royals also lost Vinnie Pasquantino to a hamate injury recently, which further dents KC’s upside at the plate. All told, this feels like a modestly watchable game for fans who prefer steady lefty-versus-righty matchups and lineup-driven action rather than fireworks.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Kansas City Royals (2.11); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.5 | 8.1% | 1.2 | 7.4 | -16.2 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 13.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.19 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.62 | -1.84 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 0.77 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.19 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.62 | -1.84 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.84 |
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 24.3 | 8.9% | 4.8 | -0.1 | -16.1 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -43.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.97 | 0.68 | 1.36 | 0.00 | -1.84 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -2.57 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.97 | 0.68 | 1.36 | 0.00 | -1.84 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.89 |
Michael Wacha, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 9.3% | 64.4% | 93.0 mph | 34 | 17.0s | -20 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.15 | -0.57 | 0.27 | -0.56 | 1.32 | -1.56 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.31 | -0.28 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.13 |
Foster Griffin, Washington Nationals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 91 | 9.9% | 65.5% | 91.3 mph | 30 | 18.4s | -7 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.48 | -0.29 | 0.69 | -1.37 | 0.28 | -0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.96 | -0.15 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.18 |
Baltimore Orioles @ Seattle Mariners, 6:40p
Summary
Not essential TV but worth a look: Logan Gilbert’s reliable, swing-and-miss repertoire versus Brandon Young’s recent breakthrough gives this one quiet tension rather than fireworks. Gilbert’s underlying profile — better-than-average xFIP and a legit strikeout upside — is the main reason to tune in, while Young’s hot stretch (including a seven-scoreless outing against Seattle earlier this month) supplies the upset potential.
The gNERD of 9.49 sits a touch below today’s average, driven by middling team NERDs and a split in pitcher quality: Gilbert’s pNERD (6.21) reflects strong peripherals (xFIP-friendly, above-average velocity and chase/whiff metrics), while Young’s 3.22 comes from a quieter strikeout profile but rising results after a rocky track record. The Orioles bring better broadcasting and bullpen run contributions; the Mariners rate higher on raw batting runs but have defensive drags baked into their tNERD, which mutes overall excitement. Given the smallluck signals and no big injury headlines, this is a solid, pitcher-centric game for viewers who prefer matchup details and sequencing over high-scoring action.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Seattle Mariners (2.52)
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 15.0 | 8.5% | 0.0 | -8.3 | 19.8 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -4.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.61 | 0.35 | -0.12 | -0.67 | 0.41 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.24 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.61 | 0.35 | -0.12 | -0.67 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.02 |
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 17.8 | 8.5% | -3.2 | -14.3 | 17.0 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 13.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.72 | 0.35 | -1.11 | -1.16 | 0.23 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 0.77 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.72 | 0.35 | -1.11 | -1.16 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 4.54 |
Brandon Young, Baltimore Orioles
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 10.3% | 64.9% | 93.9 mph | 27 | 19.0s | -37 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.62 | -0.11 | 0.45 | -0.14 | -0.50 | 0.05 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.23 | -0.05 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.50 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.22 |
Logan Gilbert, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 88 | 13.0% | 64.6% | 95.5 mph | 29 | 20.1s | 4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.66 | 1.15 | 0.34 | 0.62 | 0.02 | 0.94 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.31 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 0.62 | 0.00 | -0.47 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.21 |
San Francisco Giants @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
Not a blue-chip must-watch: the Braves' strong roster and surface-level pitching edges make this more of a polite obligation than a thriller. The gNERD of 8.12 puts the game below today's average (about 10.7) and a touch under the historical median, so expect competence rather than fireworks.
The numbers explain why: a wide tNERD gap — Braves 7.36 vs Giants 2.60 — signals Atlanta's lineup, barrels, and defense should generate action while San Francisco offers little supporting offense or bullpen juice; the Giants' unusually high positive luck suggests they're underperforming their underlying metrics and could be slightly more dangerous than their record implies. Adrian Houser's pNERD is modest and his profile (veteran signing to the Giants who hasn't missed many bats this year) points to innings-eater starts but low swing-and-miss upside. Grant Holmes grades a hair higher and has produced steadier peripherals as a Braves starter, meaning fewer early meltdowns but not elite strikeout upside. Taken together, the pitchers' combined pNERD (~3.14) dampens pure watchability: good matchup for bettors who like lineup advantages, not for viewers chasing high-leverage, high-variance pitching duels.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 7.8 | 6.8% | -6.5 | -8.4 | -6.7 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 23.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.33 | -1.02 | -2.12 | -0.68 | -1.25 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 1.37 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.33 | -1.02 | -2.12 | -0.68 | -1.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 2.60 |
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 19.6 | 9.3% | -0.4 | 8.7 | 30.8 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -22.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.79 | 1.00 | -0.24 | 0.72 | 1.09 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -1.31 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.79 | 1.00 | -0.24 | 0.72 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.36 |
Adrian Houser, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 116 | 7.8% | 62.5% | 94.9 mph | 33 | 17.6s | 21 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.96 | -1.26 | -0.51 | 0.34 | 1.06 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.92 | -0.63 | -0.25 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.86 |
Grant Holmes, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 107 | 12.9% | 62.8% | 94.2 mph | 30 | 18.6s | -10 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.44 | 1.10 | -0.39 | 0.01 | 0.28 | -0.27 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.88 | 0.55 | -0.19 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.41 |
New York Mets @ Cincinnati Reds, 4:10p
Summary
Not a can't-miss pitching duel — it's more a "should-I-watch-for-the-storyline" game: Kodai Senga returns from a lengthy IL stint and rehab starts, but both starters' analytical profiles suggest a low-octane duel. Senga is being activated off the injured list after rehab appearances and will make his first start since late April, which is the real narrative pull here, though he may be on a limited ramp-up.
The numbers explain the low gNERD (7.97): both pNERDs are well below today's pitching average (Senga 2.09, Singer 3.32; average pitchers today ≈5.09), driven by elevated xFIP- marks and weak chase/whiff signals — not the ingredients of an exciting strikeout-heavy duel. The team side is middling (tNERD ~5.3): Cincinnati’s barrel rate and recent offensive explosion (they thumped the Mets 12–0 the night before) add some watch value, while the Mets’ bullpen and big-market broadcaster ratings nudge interest a bit.
Bottom line: skip this one if you want fireworks; tune in if you care about Senga’s comeback and whether the Reds’ offense keeps humming.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -36.9 | 9.0% | -0.5 | -2.2 | 29.3 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -22.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.40 | 0.76 | -0.27 | -0.17 | 1.00 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -1.31 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.40 | 0.76 | -0.27 | -0.17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 5.52 |
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -21.4 | 9.9% | 1.7 | -4.5 | -14.8 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 8.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.80 | 1.48 | 0.40 | -0.36 | -1.76 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.48 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.80 | 1.48 | 0.40 | -0.36 | -1.76 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.01 |
Kodai Senga, New York Mets
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 118 | 12.2% | 59.5% | 95.3 mph | 33 | 20.5s | 107 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.08 | 0.78 | -1.68 | 0.53 | 1.06 | 1.27 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.16 | 0.39 | -0.84 | 0.53 | 0.00 | -0.63 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.09 |
Brady Singer, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 111 | 8.7% | 61.4% | 91.2 mph | 29 | 16.8s | 18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.67 | -0.85 | -0.94 | -1.41 | 0.02 | -1.72 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.35 | -0.42 | -0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.32 |
Detroit Tigers @ Houston Astros, 5:10p
Summary
This is a below‑average watchability game — the gNERD (7.55) is driven more by narrative than by elite matchup quality: Hunter Brown’s comeback and Framber Valdez facing his old club are the hooks, not overpowering pitching or explosive team metrics. The two teams’ tNERD numbers are low and shallow (average team NERD 3.66), and the pitching side is similarly muted: Valdez’s pNERD (2.78) reflects middling peripherals (xFIP‑ about 105 and an unusually low swing‑and‑miss profile in these components), while Brown’s pNERD is 0 because he’s just returning from the IL and lacks a current sample here. Hunter Brown’s activation is the real storyline — he’s coming off a shoulder IL stint after strong pre‑injury strikeout runs and rehab starts that put him back on track. Houston’s pitching depth has been banged up, which adds a marginal wrinkle if Brown is on a short leash and the bullpen gets used early. In short: watch if you care about returns, revenge and roster drama; skip if you’re hunting high‑NERD, analytically juicy contests.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -5.5 | 9.4% | -3.1 | -14.6 | 7.8 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 20.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.19 | 1.08 | -1.08 | -1.19 | -0.34 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.19 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.19 | 1.08 | -1.08 | -1.19 | -0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 4.09 |
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 8.7 | 8.7% | -2.0 | -2.6 | -3.4 | $232.7M | 28.9 | 3.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.74 | -0.20 | -1.04 | 0.34 | -0.16 | 0.18 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.74 | -0.20 | -1.04 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.23 |
Framber Valdez, Detroit Tigers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 105 | 8.8% | 65.1% | 94.0 mph | 32 | 19.5s | -1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.33 | -0.80 | 0.53 | -0.09 | 0.80 | 0.46 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.65 | -0.40 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.78 |
Hunter Brown, Houston Astros
No detailed stats available
Minnesota Twins @ Texas Rangers, 5:05p
Summary
Low-stakes pitching duel with one interesting arm and one that has struggled to stick: Zebby Matthews brings the only splash of intrigue, while Kumar Rocker’s profile makes this an easy pass if you’re hunting for fireworks. Matthews was a recent recall who turned in a scoreless statement start in May and carries the better pNERD (5.66) here — his plus velocity, blistering pace and a bit of good fortune lift his projection. The Rangers’ Kumar Rocker has shown strikeout ability but inconsistent command and a history of health/role questions this season, and his low pNERD (2.70) mostly reflects poor strike% and a slow pace that dampen excitement. Team-wise the matchup is dull: both clubs’ tNERDs are underwhelming (Twins 2.12, Rangers 4.56) with Minnesota’s defense a clear negative and Texas’ run of bad luck suggesting some upside — but not enough to rescue a gNERD of 7.52, which sits below today’s average. In short: watch for Matthews’ tempo and whether Rocker can miss more bats than he walks; otherwise this one’s more useful to sleep on than to stream.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, Texas Rangers (2.08)
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -4.1 | 8.5% | -3.7 | -14.1 | 2.3 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -13.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.13 | 0.35 | -1.26 | -1.15 | -0.69 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -0.78 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.13 | 0.35 | -1.26 | -1.15 | -0.69 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.12 |
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.8 | 7.5% | -0.3 | 1.5 | 20.7 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 17.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.39 | -0.45 | -0.21 | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 1.01 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.39 | -0.45 | -0.21 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.56 |
Zebby Matthews, Minnesota Twins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 106 | 9.6% | 63.2% | 95.2 mph | 26 | 16.7s | 16 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.38 | -0.43 | -0.20 | 0.48 | -0.76 | -1.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.77 | -0.22 | -0.10 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.66 |
Kumar Rocker, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 105 | 9.8% | 61.0% | 94.4 mph | 26 | 20.4s | -19 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.33 | -0.34 | -1.10 | 0.10 | -0.76 | 1.18 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.65 | -0.17 | -0.55 | 0.10 | 0.76 | -0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.70 |
Los Angeles Angels @ Arizona Diamondbacks, 6:40p
Summary
Low-ceiling game: the gNERD (6.70) flags this as the least watchable option on the board — Reid Detmers gives it some spice, but Merrill Kelly’s underlying metrics and two undermanned offenses keep this from being a must-see. Detmers is the real attraction: a pitcher with a strong recent stretch (lots of Ks and better-than-looks peripherals) whose pNERD (7.74) is driven by a sub-100 xFIP- and a positive luck/pacing profile that suggests you might get quality innings rather than a slog. Kelly, by contrast, checks the “veteran who’s lost swing-and-miss and sits high in xFIP-” box — his surface ERA/WHIP and aging profile match the tiny pNERD (0.27), so expect contact and uneven results. The teams’ tNERDs (Angels 1.04, D-backs 4.35) reflect weak offenses and a defensive split that slightly helps Arizona, but neither lineup promises fireworks. Given the matchup, tune in only if you want Detmers’ pitch sequencing and chase for strikeouts; otherwise this is background-TV baseball that the gNERD properly understates.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Los Angeles Angels (2.01)
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -9.8 | 9.3% | -4.2 | -20.7 | -6.1 | $191.6M | 28.6 | -3.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.35 | 1.00 | -1.41 | -1.69 | -1.21 | -0.13 | -0.39 | -0.18 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.35 | 1.00 | -1.41 | -1.69 | -1.21 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1.04 |
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -26.2 | 6.9% | 2.5 | 17.4 | 16.3 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -13.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.99 | -0.94 | 0.65 | 1.44 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -0.78 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.99 | -0.94 | 0.65 | 1.44 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.35 |
Reid Detmers, Los Angeles Angels
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 83 | 12.5% | 65.1% | 94.1 mph | 26 | 18.9s | 11 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.94 | 0.91 | 0.53 | -0.04 | -0.76 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.89 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.74 |
Merrill Kelly, Arizona Diamondbacks
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 129 | 9.9% | 62.4% | 92.0 mph | 37 | 18.3s | 1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.71 | -0.29 | -0.53 | -1.04 | 2.10 | -0.51 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -3.43 | -0.15 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.27 |
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on June 15, 2026