MLB: What to watch on September 2, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Milwaukee Brewers @ Chicago Cubs, 4:40p
Summary
This is about as good as it gets on paper, and the numbers back it up: a 20.60 gNERD score, comfortably atop today's slate and near the historic ceiling. Jacob Misiorowski, sporting a pNERD of 15.28 built on triple-digit velocity and elite swing-and-miss rates, is making his first start of September, with an opportunity to beat the Cubs for the third time this year, entering with a Majors lead in ERA, strikeouts, WHIP and opponents' average. He's now just a few weeks from what appears to be an NL Cy Young-winning season, 14-5 with a 1.73 ERA and 2.14 FIP over 151 innings, and even Pedro Martinez is publicly hyping him up. David Peterson, by contrast, offers a modest 5.51 pNERD and is mostly along for the ride, though since being acquired by the Cubs in late June he's pitched to a better 3.90 ERA and 4.31 FIP than his ugly season-long numbers suggest. Both tNERD marks sit well above average — Chicago's fueled by strong batting and fielding runs, Milwaukee's by baserunning and bullpen depth — and with the Brewers holding an eight-game NL Central lead, this is a marquee pitcher plus two solid lineups. Watch it.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Milwaukee Brewers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
39.9 |
7.4% |
8.5 |
1.4 |
54.7 |
$139.3M |
27.7 |
-16.0 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.13 |
-0.30 |
1.52 |
0.06 |
1.15 |
-0.73 |
-1.21 |
-0.86 |
0.53 |
0.37 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.13 |
-0.30 |
1.52 |
0.06 |
1.15 |
0.73 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
0.27 |
0.18 |
4.00 |
9.95 |
Chicago Cubs
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
104.6 |
7.5% |
3.8 |
61.7 |
-12.1 |
$246.2M |
29.8 |
5.0 |
3.01 |
3.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
2.89 |
-0.19 |
0.65 |
2.95 |
-1.54 |
0.50 |
0.67 |
0.28 |
1.22 |
1.62 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
2.89 |
-0.19 |
0.65 |
2.95 |
-1.54 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.28 |
0.61 |
0.81 |
4.00 |
10.46 |
Jacob Misiorowski, Milwaukee Brewers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
51 |
17.7% |
67.8% |
100.6 mph |
24 |
19.6s |
-9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-2.98 |
3.36 |
1.64 |
2.88 |
-1.23 |
0.43 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
5.96 |
1.68 |
0.82 |
2.00 |
1.23 |
-0.22 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
15.28 |
David Peterson, Chicago Cubs
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
96 |
9.7% |
63.3% |
92.3 mph |
30 |
18.2s |
29 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.32 |
-0.37 |
-0.21 |
-0.85 |
0.38 |
-0.71 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.65 |
-0.18 |
-0.11 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.36 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.51 |
Go back to top of page
New York Yankees @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
A legitimate Cy Young frontrunner takes the mound against a last-place club that's found itself a genuine problem in a lefty with a hot streak — this one's better than the standings suggest. Cam Schlittler enters as the American League frontrunner to win the Cy Young, posting a 2.09 ERA through 163.2 innings this season, and he's been especially nasty lately — 2-0 with a 1.13 ERA in his last four starts — with his 10.47 pNERD backed by elite velocity (98 mph) and strikeout stuff pushing his xFIP- to an excellent 71. On the other side, Reid Detmers isn't just a sacrificial lamb: he's 4-8 with a 1.55 ERA in his last eight starts for Los Angeles, and has historically owned this Yankees lineup, having given up one run in 15.1 innings in his career against the Yankees. That backstory bumps his pNERD to a respectable 7.30. The Yankees carry real team quality (8.29 tNERD, elite barrel rate) while the Angels' offense and defense are both well below average, dragging their tNERD to 1.26 — but with two quality arms dueling, don't expect much scoring. At a combined 13.66 gNERD, this sits above the historic average and is one of the more watchable matchups on today's slate.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, New York Yankees (2.22)
New York Yankees
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
8.3 |
9.5% |
6.3 |
4.3 |
44.3 |
$337.1M |
29.9 |
-21.0 |
2.08 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.27 |
1.98 |
1.11 |
0.20 |
0.73 |
1.54 |
0.85 |
-1.13 |
-0.61 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.27 |
1.98 |
1.11 |
0.20 |
0.73 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.29 |
Los Angeles Angels
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-43.5 |
7.9% |
-6.0 |
-28.4 |
25.6 |
$191.6M |
28.6 |
-10.0 |
2.59 |
2.01 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.14 |
0.24 |
-1.17 |
-1.37 |
-0.02 |
-0.13 |
-0.39 |
-0.53 |
0.40 |
-0.80 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.14 |
0.24 |
-1.17 |
-1.37 |
-0.02 |
0.13 |
0.39 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.26 |
Cam Schlittler, New York Yankees
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
71 |
13.6% |
66.8% |
98.0 mph |
25 |
21.4s |
-21 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.80 |
1.45 |
1.24 |
1.71 |
-0.97 |
1.91 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
3.60 |
0.72 |
0.62 |
1.71 |
0.97 |
-0.95 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
10.47 |
Reid Detmers, Los Angeles Angels
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
85 |
12.5% |
65.7% |
94.1 mph |
26 |
19.1s |
0 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.97 |
0.94 |
0.79 |
-0.04 |
-0.70 |
0.02 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.95 |
0.47 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
-0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.30 |
Go back to top of page
St. Louis Cardinals @ Los Angeles Dodgers, 7:10p
Summary
I've got enough for a solid summary.
Yamamoto and the Dodgers try to erase the memory of getting torched, and only one team is bringing a real starter to the mound. This game is worth catching mainly for Yamamoto, since the Cardinals are countering with a bullpen game and no named starter at all. St. Louis just hung 13 runs and five homers on LA a night earlier—Thomas Saggese hit two, Jordan Walker added a two-run shot—so there's a decent chance Wednesday is as much about revenge as pitching. Yamamoto, though, is in the middle of a strong stretch: he's looking to pick up where he left off after a dominant August, when he posted a 1.95 ERA with 35 strikeouts over 32.1 innings, and sits at 12-8 with a 2.56 ERA and 153 strikeouts across 158 innings on the season. His 8.14 pNERD is driven by strong strikeout-and-command indicators and above-average velocity, easily the best pitching mark in this matchup and well above the historic median. The Dodgers' 7.77 tNERD, fueled by top-tier batting runs and a deep bullpen, gives them the sturdier lineup, while St. Louis compensates with fielding and age advantages. A gNERD of 13.62 sits comfortably above both the historic and today's averages, making this one of the better watches on the board, mostly because of Yamamoto rather than any single storyline.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
St. Louis Cardinals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-29.0 |
7.7% |
1.7 |
16.3 |
2.0 |
$111.2M |
26.9 |
-30.0 |
2.17 |
2.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.74 |
0.03 |
0.26 |
0.77 |
-0.97 |
-1.05 |
-1.94 |
-1.61 |
-0.43 |
-0.50 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.74 |
0.03 |
0.26 |
0.77 |
-0.97 |
1.05 |
1.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.34 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
56.6 |
8.4% |
-3.5 |
13.1 |
44.6 |
$413.5M |
30.0 |
10.0 |
2.45 |
2.51 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.58 |
0.78 |
-0.70 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
2.41 |
0.90 |
0.55 |
0.12 |
0.26 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.58 |
0.78 |
-0.70 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.55 |
0.06 |
0.13 |
4.00 |
7.77 |
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Los Angeles Dodgers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
79 |
11.5% |
65.8% |
95.9 mph |
27 |
19.5s |
-17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.33 |
0.47 |
0.85 |
0.77 |
-0.43 |
0.35 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.66 |
0.23 |
0.43 |
0.77 |
0.43 |
-0.18 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
8.14 |
Go back to top of page
Miami Marlins @ Kansas City Royals, 4:40p
Summary
Cameron's on a heater and Pérez is trying to shake off his worst outing of the year — that's the actual hook here, and the underlying NERD components back it up enough to make this a decent watch. The Marlins own a solid 9.13 tNERD thanks to strong baserunning, a young/cheap roster, and some positive regression-implying luck, while the Royals limp in with a middling 3.89 mark dragged down by a rough bullpen. Cameron has been the story of Kansas City's summer: Cameron (9-8, 3.98 ERA) was 5-8 with a 5.27 ERA on July 19. In seven starts since, the left-hander is 4-0 with a 1.29 ERA and an 0.72 WHIP, and he's never faced Miami before. Pérez, meanwhile, is looking to bounce back after he allowed all five runs, including a three-run homer, in his third and final inning of Miami's 9-2 loss at Washington from Friday... It was the shortest outing of the season for Perez, and he's also never faced Kansas City. Pérez still owns the better pNERD (7.74 vs. 5.45), fueled by elite velocity and a favorable age curve, giving this game more juice than the Royals' offense alone would suggest. Overall, a 13.11 gNERD sits comfortably above the historical average — worth a look, especially for the pitching narratives.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Kansas City Royals (2.11); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Miami Marlins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-3.3 |
6.6% |
8.0 |
8.3 |
29.4 |
$81.5M |
27.4 |
28.0 |
1.79 |
1.66 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.04 |
-1.17 |
1.43 |
0.39 |
0.13 |
-1.39 |
-1.49 |
1.52 |
-1.17 |
-1.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.04 |
-1.17 |
1.43 |
0.39 |
0.13 |
1.39 |
1.49 |
1.52 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
9.13 |
Kansas City Royals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-13.5 |
7.9% |
3.6 |
14.6 |
-32.5 |
$184.5M |
29.7 |
15.0 |
2.11 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.32 |
0.24 |
0.61 |
0.69 |
-2.36 |
-0.21 |
0.62 |
0.81 |
-0.54 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.32 |
0.24 |
0.61 |
0.69 |
-2.36 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.81 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.89 |
Eury Pérez, Miami Marlins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
95 |
13.9% |
63.4% |
98.1 mph |
23 |
21.0s |
-13 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.38 |
1.59 |
-0.17 |
1.76 |
-1.50 |
1.58 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.76 |
0.79 |
-0.09 |
1.76 |
1.50 |
-0.79 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.74 |
Noah Cameron, Kansas City Royals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
99 |
11.2% |
62.9% |
92.4 mph |
26 |
17.4s |
-6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.15 |
0.33 |
-0.36 |
-0.81 |
-0.70 |
-1.37 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.29 |
0.16 |
-0.18 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
0.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.45 |
Go back to top of page
Toronto Blue Jays @ Cleveland Guardians, 3:40p
Summary
Cy Young contender Dylan Cease and a Cleveland club fighting for its playoff life make this one worth a look, even if the offenses might not put on a show. Cease has been the story of the Blue Jays' season, and it shows in the numbers: he's 9-5 with a 2.33 ERA and a 1.05 WHIP, and has allowed four earned runs across his last three starts while working at least six innings in each, backing up an excellent 9.49 pNERD built on elite strikeout stuff and mid-90s velocity. Cantillo is a solid complementary arm with a respectable 5.11 pNERD, though his 1.45 WHIP is a real vulnerability, and he's had a mixed history against Toronto specifically. The Guardians bring more juice to the tNERD ledger (7.16) than the Jays (3.11), fueled by youth and a scrappy, low-payroll roster, while Toronto's lineup has quietly been underwhelming at the plate. Context matters here too: Cleveland sits three games back in the wild card race and has been playing its best baseball in weeks, going 8-2 over their last ten, while Toronto is mostly playing spoiler. With a gNERD of 12.43, this sits solidly above the historic average and roughly in line with today's slate — not a must-watch, but a legitimately entertaining pitching-driven game with playoff stakes attached to one side.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Toronto Blue Jays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-44.0 |
5.9% |
-2.7 |
31.6 |
33.7 |
$306.1M |
30.1 |
4.0 |
3.10 |
2.39 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.15 |
-1.93 |
-0.55 |
1.51 |
0.31 |
1.18 |
0.99 |
0.22 |
1.40 |
0.01 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.15 |
-1.93 |
-0.55 |
1.51 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.22 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.11 |
Cleveland Guardians
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-33.7 |
5.9% |
5.4 |
14.4 |
39.6 |
$88.9M |
27.6 |
6.0 |
2.16 |
3.14 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.87 |
-1.93 |
0.95 |
0.68 |
0.54 |
-1.30 |
-1.35 |
0.33 |
-0.44 |
1.60 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.87 |
-1.93 |
0.95 |
0.68 |
0.54 |
1.30 |
1.35 |
0.33 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
4.00 |
7.16 |
Dylan Cease, Toronto Blue Jays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
66 |
14.2% |
62.0% |
96.9 mph |
30 |
19.6s |
-10 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-2.10 |
1.73 |
-0.74 |
1.22 |
0.38 |
0.43 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
4.19 |
0.86 |
-0.37 |
1.22 |
0.00 |
-0.22 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
9.49 |
Joey Cantillo, Cleveland Guardians
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
98 |
12.9% |
62.1% |
92.2 mph |
26 |
19.1s |
-9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.20 |
1.12 |
-0.69 |
-0.90 |
-0.70 |
0.02 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.41 |
0.56 |
-0.35 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
-0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.11 |
Go back to top of page
Atlanta Braves @ Washington Nationals, 10:05a
Summary
A first-place club visits a last-place club in a game that's more watchable for its quirks than its stakes. Atlanta (82-57) is trying to avoid a third straight loss and salvage a split after Washington took the opener 9-5, while the Nationals (67-74) are turning to Brad Lord, who's a reliever making a spot start on a short leash after Washington wanted to give its rotation extra rest. That bullpen-game gamble actually plays well here — Lord's peripherals (94.6 mph heat, sharp strike rate, tidy 94 xFIP-) give him the higher pNERD of the two starters, even if he won't go deep. Holmes, meanwhile, has been steady if unspectacular: Holmes has allowed three earned runs or fewer in nine of his last 10 outings, going 5-1 with a 3.33 ERA, and he's chasing his 130th inning of the year. The real juice is on the team side — Washington's tNERD (8.73) outpaces Atlanta's (5.85) thanks to a young, cheap roster with strong baserunning and contact quality, even though their bullpen has been a mess all year. Overall gNERD of 11.71 sits a tick above the historical average, making this a solidly average watch elevated by the bullpen-game intrigue.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Atlanta Braves (2.36); radio, Atlanta Braves (2.36)
Atlanta Braves
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-7.0 |
8.6% |
-1.5 |
10.6 |
46.5 |
$249.8M |
30.5 |
-28.0 |
2.36 |
2.36 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.15 |
1.00 |
-0.33 |
0.50 |
0.82 |
0.54 |
1.36 |
-1.51 |
-0.05 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.15 |
1.00 |
-0.33 |
0.50 |
0.82 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.85 |
Washington Nationals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
41.4 |
8.9% |
10.7 |
-7.8 |
-24.6 |
$114.5M |
27.1 |
-30.0 |
2.00 |
2.20 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.17 |
1.33 |
1.93 |
-0.38 |
-2.04 |
-1.01 |
-1.71 |
-1.61 |
-0.75 |
-0.40 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.17 |
1.33 |
1.93 |
-0.38 |
-2.04 |
1.01 |
1.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.73 |
Grant Holmes, Atlanta Braves
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
108 |
12.1% |
62.9% |
93.9 mph |
30 |
18.7s |
-19 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.39 |
0.75 |
-0.37 |
-0.13 |
0.38 |
-0.30 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.77 |
0.37 |
-0.19 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.37 |
Brad Lord, Washington Nationals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
94 |
8.7% |
66.8% |
94.6 mph |
26 |
19.8s |
-6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.44 |
-0.84 |
1.24 |
0.18 |
-0.70 |
0.60 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.88 |
-0.42 |
0.62 |
0.18 |
0.70 |
-0.30 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.46 |
Go back to top of page
New York Mets @ Tampa Bay Rays, 3:40p
Summary
Some Rays are having a strong season overall—elite bullpen depth on a shoestring budget faces a Mets team playing out the string, but the mound matchup gives this game an unusual jolt of watchability. Griffin Jax, who returns from a stint on the IL with right elbow discomfort, brings real firepower: his low xFIP- and a sharp whiff rate power an 8.32 pNERD, comfortably above the league mean and among the more interesting arms you'll see this week. Opposite him is Justin Hagenman, making just his fourth appearance since fracturing a rib in spring training and his first Mets outing since a shaky nine-game cameo last year—the Mets are treating this purely as roster-management filler while resting their rotation, so don't expect much beyond raw curiosity about whether he sticks around past Wednesday. The Rays, at 83-55, have built a big AL East cushion despite a punchless barrel rate, leaning on bullpen depth and low payroll efficiency, while the fading Mets counter with a deep, well-paid bullpen of their own. With a gNERD of 11.64, this sits a bit above the historical average, mostly propped up by Jax's quality one man show against an unheralded fill-in.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
New York Mets
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-44.4 |
8.4% |
-4.2 |
-0.7 |
43.5 |
$374.9M |
29.9 |
2.0 |
3.32 |
3.05 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.16 |
0.78 |
-0.83 |
-0.04 |
0.70 |
1.97 |
0.85 |
0.11 |
1.82 |
1.41 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.16 |
0.78 |
-0.83 |
-0.04 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.91 |
0.70 |
4.00 |
5.18 |
Tampa Bay Rays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
31.2 |
5.7% |
1.9 |
-2.3 |
20.6 |
$106.9M |
29.1 |
18.0 |
2.27 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.89 |
-2.14 |
0.30 |
-0.12 |
-0.22 |
-1.10 |
0.07 |
0.98 |
-0.23 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.89 |
-2.14 |
0.30 |
-0.12 |
-0.22 |
1.10 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
4.79 |
Justin Hagenman, New York Mets
No detailed stats available
Griffin Jax, Tampa Bay Rays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
80 |
13.9% |
64.7% |
95.8 mph |
31 |
19.1s |
6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.27 |
1.59 |
0.36 |
0.72 |
0.64 |
0.02 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.54 |
0.79 |
0.18 |
0.72 |
0.00 |
-0.01 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
8.32 |
Go back to top of page
Philadelphia Phillies @ Arizona Diamondbacks, 12:40p
Summary
A solid pitching watch more than a slugfest, with Andrew Painter's electric arm doing the heavy lifting. The Phillies have already wrapped up this series and arrive on a roll, having clinched the series already and arrive as one of the hottest teams in the National League, while Arizona has struggled to generate offense, managing just a single run on Tuesday.
Painter's 7.07 pNERD is the headliner here—driven by his mid-90s velocity, his youth (23 years old), and a luck score suggesting his ugly 5.95 ERA badly understates his actual stuff; regression toward better results looks likely. Taylor Clarke, by contrast, gets a flat 0.00 pNERD simply because we lack detailed data on him, despite a tidy surface-level ERA. Both teams post nearly identical, middling tNERD marks (5.41 and 5.36)—neither offense hits the ball especially hard, though both flash solid baserunning and the Diamondbacks' defense stands out. At 11.42, the gNERD sits almost exactly at today's average, making this a reasonably watchable game elevated mainly by Painter's arm rather than by star-studded lineups.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Philadelphia Phillies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-40.9 |
7.2% |
6.8 |
-2.8 |
53.1 |
$309.8M |
30.5 |
-22.0 |
2.92 |
2.69 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.07 |
-0.52 |
1.21 |
-0.14 |
1.09 |
1.22 |
1.36 |
-1.18 |
1.03 |
0.64 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.07 |
-0.52 |
1.21 |
-0.14 |
1.09 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.52 |
0.32 |
4.00 |
5.41 |
Arizona Diamondbacks
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-25.8 |
7.0% |
8.2 |
26.9 |
26.1 |
$231.6M |
30.2 |
-16.0 |
2.19 |
1.92 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.66 |
-0.73 |
1.47 |
1.28 |
0.00 |
0.33 |
1.08 |
-0.86 |
-0.39 |
-0.99 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.66 |
-0.73 |
1.47 |
1.28 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.36 |
Andrew Painter, Philadelphia Phillies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
107 |
10.8% |
64.0% |
96.3 mph |
23 |
18.2s |
31 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.33 |
0.14 |
0.10 |
0.95 |
-1.50 |
-0.71 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.65 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
0.95 |
1.50 |
0.36 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.07 |
Taylor Clarke, Arizona Diamondbacks
No detailed stats available
Go back to top of page
San Francisco Giants @ Pittsburgh Pirates, 3:40p
Summary
Bad teams playing out the string, but there's enough juice here to make it watchable in spots. San Francisco is a lost cause—24-46 on the road and sinking toward a last-place finish—while Pittsburgh has quietly become the more interesting club, riding a strong bullpen (tNERD 6.57) after taking the series opener 13-12 on a walk-off throwing error, dropping the Giants to a league-worst road record. Bubba Chandler, the 23-year-old flamethrower, is the headliner: his velocity (98.4 mph, a robust z-score) and youth carry his pNERD, and he's been sharp lately with a 2.95 ERA over his last seven starts, striking out 32 against 13 walks. Landen Roupp's peripherals are better than his surface numbers suggest—his 4.25 ERA undersells a FIP near 3.73 with a strong strikeout rate—but control is his bugaboo, and neither starter figures to pitch deep given recent early exits. Pittsburgh's baserunning and bargain payroll give it a real behind-the-scenes edge over San Francisco's underperforming, error-prone roster. Overall gNERD sits at 10.62, essentially average both historically and among today's slate—watchable if Chandler's stuff plays, skippable if you need star power.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
San Francisco Giants
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-7.6 |
7.5% |
-5.2 |
-16.0 |
9.2 |
$228.3M |
29.6 |
23.0 |
3.20 |
3.49 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.16 |
-0.19 |
-1.02 |
-0.77 |
-0.68 |
0.29 |
0.49 |
1.25 |
1.59 |
2.34 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.16 |
-0.19 |
-1.02 |
-0.77 |
-0.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.25 |
0.79 |
1.17 |
4.00 |
4.39 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
6.4 |
7.9% |
7.2 |
-19.7 |
41.6 |
$119.1M |
28.8 |
-4.0 |
2.01 |
1.98 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.22 |
0.24 |
1.28 |
-0.95 |
0.62 |
-0.96 |
-0.20 |
-0.21 |
-0.74 |
-0.86 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.22 |
0.24 |
1.28 |
-0.95 |
0.62 |
0.96 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.57 |
Landen Roupp, San Francisco Giants
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
98 |
9.8% |
60.4% |
93.4 mph |
27 |
17.4s |
7 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.20 |
-0.32 |
-1.40 |
-0.36 |
-0.43 |
-1.37 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.41 |
-0.16 |
-0.70 |
0.00 |
0.43 |
0.68 |
0.35 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.81 |
Bubba Chandler, Pittsburgh Pirates
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
113 |
9.7% |
62.8% |
98.4 mph |
23 |
19.0s |
-14 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.68 |
-0.37 |
-0.42 |
1.89 |
-1.50 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.36 |
-0.18 |
-0.21 |
1.89 |
1.50 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.47 |
Go back to top of page
Chicago White Sox @ Houston Astros, 5:10p
Summary
A modest gNERD of 10.30 puts this one squarely in "put it on in the background" territory, but the White Sox's surprising ownership of first place in the AL Central gives it a sneaky storyline worth knowing about. Chicago enters as the division leader, while Houston has stumbled to a sub-.500 record and lost three of its last four at home, a slump that clashes with the Astros' typical late-season interest. The tNERD gap tells the tale: Chicago White Sox visit Houston Astros for a game at Daikin Park with the Sox's 8.31 tNERD (young roster, cheap payroll, solid bullpen) dwarfing Houston's 2.92, weighed down by shaky baserunning and fielding. Yordan Alvarez remains a reason to tune into any Astros game regardless — he owns at least a share of the lead in all three Triple Crown categories, leading the AL in batting average (.317) and RBI (94), while tied for first in HR (37). On the mound, Davis Martin (5.24 pNERD) reportedly struggled in his last outing, though his positive luck score suggests better results may be overdue; Hayden Wesneski (4.13 pNERD) is comparatively unheralded, with no notable current storyline attached to him from recent coverage.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Chicago White Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
27.1 |
8.3% |
-4.5 |
1.4 |
41.4 |
$105.8M |
27.1 |
-21.0 |
1.82 |
2.57 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.78 |
0.68 |
-0.89 |
0.06 |
0.62 |
-1.11 |
-1.76 |
-1.13 |
-1.11 |
0.39 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.78 |
0.68 |
-0.89 |
0.06 |
0.62 |
1.11 |
1.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
4.00 |
8.31 |
Houston Astros
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
17.2 |
7.9% |
-7.1 |
-10.6 |
23.5 |
$232.7M |
28.9 |
-7.0 |
2.17 |
1.99 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.51 |
0.24 |
-1.37 |
-0.51 |
-0.10 |
0.34 |
-0.16 |
-0.37 |
-0.42 |
-0.84 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.51 |
0.24 |
-1.37 |
-0.51 |
-0.10 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.92 |
Davis Martin, Chicago White Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
96 |
10.4% |
64.1% |
93.5 mph |
29 |
18.2s |
8 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.32 |
-0.04 |
0.13 |
-0.31 |
0.11 |
-0.71 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.65 |
-0.02 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.36 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.24 |
Hayden Wesneski, Houston Astros
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
102 |
12.3% |
63.5% |
93.4 mph |
28 |
19.4s |
-9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.03 |
0.84 |
-0.12 |
-0.36 |
-0.16 |
0.27 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.06 |
0.42 |
-0.06 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
-0.13 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.13 |
Go back to top of page
Seattle Mariners @ Boston Red Sox, 1:10p
Summary
A middling gNERD score matches a middling matchup: two shaky starters and two so-so lineups closing out a Fenway rubber match that's more "let's see how bad it gets" than must-see. Bryce Miller carries the better arm on paper (pNERD 7.02, thanks to plus velocity and strike-throwing), but his last four starts produced 20 earned runs in 20 innings, including seven walks over 4.1 innings against the Cubs on August 23, and he has not appeared since, so he arrives with unusual rest and a command question. Patrick Sandoval (pNERD 2.62) isn't inspiring confidence either — Sandoval has walked 22 batters in 45 innings and carries a 1.71 WHIP, though in his last outing against the New York Yankees, the left-hander threw 5 1/3 innings, allowing one earned run. Julio Rodriguez has feasted on Sandoval historically, going 4-11 including 2 HRs in his career against Patrick Sandoval. Boston's tNERD (6.58) edges Seattle's anemic 2.09, propped up by a strong bullpen and some positive regression looming for both clubs' underperforming luck marks. Overall, this one sits below both the historic and today's averages — watch only if you enjoy walk-fests and shaky command.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Seattle Mariners
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
0.4 |
7.6% |
-5.5 |
-38.8 |
13.8 |
$196.7M |
28.4 |
15.0 |
2.35 |
2.52 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.06 |
-0.08 |
-1.07 |
-1.87 |
-0.49 |
-0.07 |
-0.52 |
0.81 |
-0.07 |
0.28 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.06 |
-0.08 |
-1.07 |
-1.87 |
-0.49 |
0.07 |
0.52 |
0.81 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
4.00 |
2.09 |
Boston Red Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
10.5 |
7.2% |
-1.6 |
9.2 |
61.2 |
$263.6M |
29.2 |
17.0 |
2.47 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.33 |
-0.52 |
-0.35 |
0.43 |
1.41 |
0.70 |
0.17 |
0.92 |
0.16 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.33 |
-0.52 |
-0.35 |
0.43 |
1.41 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.92 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
6.58 |
Bryce Miller, Seattle Mariners
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
93 |
12.0% |
68.1% |
96.0 mph |
27 |
21.3s |
13 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.50 |
0.70 |
1.78 |
0.81 |
-0.43 |
1.82 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.00 |
0.35 |
0.89 |
0.81 |
0.43 |
-0.91 |
0.65 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.02 |
Patrick Sandoval, Boston Red Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
104 |
10.3% |
62.8% |
94.0 mph |
29 |
20.6s |
-6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.15 |
-0.09 |
-0.42 |
-0.09 |
0.11 |
1.25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.30 |
-0.04 |
-0.21 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.63 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.62 |
Go back to top of page
Detroit Tigers @ Minnesota Twins, 4:40p
Summary
Not a game to reschedule your evening around, but there's some carnage-adjacent intrigue if you like watching teams try to avoid embarrassment. Detroit rolls into Target Field having been outscored 26-3 over the last two nights, including a 15-2 shellacking Tuesday where the Twins hung a 10-run sixth inning on them, so Anderson's task is less "win the game" and more "restore some dignity." Both tNERD marks sit low (3.30 and 3.28), well below the historic median of 5.60, reflecting two middling offenses dragged down further by shaky bullpens and baserunning on both sides — Minnesota's苦-fielding roster (-21.5 fielding runs) isn't helping either. The pitching is more watchable: Drew Anderson's 6.69 pNERD is comfortably above average, built on a 3.87 ERA with a 1.33 WHIP and 96 strikeouts and a lively fastball, though reports note his season-high pitch count is 89, and he has not reached six innings recently, with command wobbling. Dean Kremer, since arriving from Baltimore, has been inconsistent — he leaned harder on his splitter for one strong outing against Baltimore, but the trend has since reversed, with a 6.42 ERA since the All-Star break. With a 9.08 gNERD, this sits below today's 11.13 average — watch only if you enjoy schadenfreude or Kremer's shiny 40.0 luck score signaling a possible correction against him.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Detroit Tigers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-8.4 |
8.2% |
-3.9 |
-8.5 |
7.9 |
$239.2M |
29.6 |
4.0 |
2.74 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.18 |
0.57 |
-0.78 |
-0.41 |
-0.73 |
0.42 |
0.58 |
0.22 |
0.69 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.18 |
0.57 |
-0.78 |
-0.41 |
-0.73 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.22 |
0.34 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
3.30 |
Minnesota Twins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
31.0 |
7.9% |
-5.7 |
-21.5 |
9.0 |
$122.1M |
28.9 |
-10.0 |
2.30 |
2.06 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.89 |
0.24 |
-1.11 |
-1.04 |
-0.69 |
-0.92 |
-0.06 |
-0.53 |
-0.17 |
-0.69 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.89 |
0.24 |
-1.11 |
-1.04 |
-0.69 |
0.92 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.28 |
Drew Anderson, Detroit Tigers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
89 |
12.6% |
64.3% |
95.6 mph |
32 |
19.0s |
3 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.74 |
0.98 |
0.24 |
0.63 |
0.91 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.47 |
0.49 |
0.12 |
0.63 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.69 |
Dean Kremer, Minnesota Twins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
96 |
11.3% |
61.8% |
92.7 mph |
30 |
19.9s |
40 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.32 |
0.38 |
-0.81 |
-0.67 |
0.38 |
0.68 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.65 |
0.19 |
-0.41 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.34 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.89 |
Go back to top of page
San Diego Padres @ Cincinnati Reds, 9:40a
Summary
Padres are clinging to a wild-card spot while the Reds are just playing out the string, and the real draw here is Brandon Williamson's return: he's making his first big-league start since April 29, coming off a 60-day IL stint for left shoulder fatigue, and this is basically a live rehab audition at a park that historically eats him alive (a 10.03 ERA at home versus 3.31 on the road this year). That novelty is the whole reason to tune in, because the underlying numbers aren't pretty—Williamson's xFIP- sits at 154, dragging his pNERD to -3.34, the worst of any pitcher in today's slate. Casey Mize is comfortably better (pNERD 4.27) thanks to sharp control, though he's coming off a rough finish to August, allowing 11 runs over his last two starts. The Padres' 9.44 tNERD is well above the historical 75th percentile, fueled by an excellent bullpen and strong fielding, while Cincinnati's 4.66 is closer to average, buoyed by better underlying batted-ball luck (positive luck score suggests they should be scoring even more). Overall gNERD of 7.52 lands below both the historical and today's averages—watchable mostly for the Williamson storyline, not the pitching matchup itself.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-11.7 |
8.0% |
2.8 |
17.9 |
74.5 |
$255.5M |
29.9 |
-6.0 |
3.47 |
3.37 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.27 |
0.35 |
0.46 |
0.85 |
1.95 |
0.60 |
0.85 |
-0.32 |
2.12 |
2.09 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.27 |
0.35 |
0.46 |
0.85 |
1.95 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.06 |
1.04 |
4.00 |
9.44 |
Cincinnati Reds
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-52.3 |
9.1% |
-0.6 |
-6.5 |
-6.3 |
$147.4M |
28.0 |
13.0 |
2.09 |
2.11 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.38 |
1.54 |
-0.16 |
-0.32 |
-1.30 |
-0.63 |
-0.94 |
0.71 |
-0.59 |
-0.59 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.38 |
1.54 |
-0.16 |
-0.32 |
-1.30 |
0.63 |
0.94 |
0.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
4.66 |
Casey Mize, San Diego Padres
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
103 |
10.5% |
64.8% |
93.4 mph |
29 |
18.0s |
-19 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.09 |
0.00 |
0.43 |
-0.36 |
0.11 |
-0.88 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.18 |
0.00 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.44 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.27 |
Brandon Williamson, Cincinnati Reds
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
154 |
9.8% |
57.5% |
92.7 mph |
28 |
18.2s |
-10 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
3.10 |
-0.32 |
-2.57 |
-0.67 |
-0.16 |
-0.71 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-6.21 |
-0.16 |
-1.29 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.36 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
-3.34 |
Go back to top of page
Baltimore Orioles @ Colorado Rockies, 12:10p
Summary
Both teams are out of contention (Orioles hovering at .500, Rockies buried in last place at 18-28 in this stretch), and this game's low gNERD score of 6.90 sits well below the historical average of 10.81 and today's average of 11.13, so treat it as background noise rather than must-watch baseball. The Rockies own baseball's worst offense and defense by measurable metrics, with rock-bottom batting runs and fielding numbers dragging their tNERD to a paltry 1.25 — one of the lower marks you'll see. Baltimore's 6.02 tNERD is more respectable, buoyed by a strong bullpen and solid barrel rate, but this is a fading Orioles team playing out the string too. On the mound, Trevor Rogers offers modest intrigue: his plus command (elite strike rate) drives a 6.09 pNERD, though he's coming off a rough outing where he gave up six earned runs on seven hits in five innings against the Cardinals. Sugano, by contrast, is scuffling — his last start saw him allow six earned runs on 10 hits in four innings, and his peripherals (weak whiff and strike rates) support a near-replacement 0.44 pNERD. Add in Coors Field's notorious offense-inflating altitude, and this game is quantity over quality.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Baltimore Orioles (2.10)
Baltimore Orioles
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
16.6 |
8.7% |
-2.9 |
-2.9 |
43.6 |
$214.8M |
29.0 |
-15.0 |
2.82 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.50 |
1.11 |
-0.59 |
-0.15 |
0.71 |
0.14 |
-0.02 |
-0.80 |
0.85 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.50 |
1.11 |
-0.59 |
-0.15 |
0.71 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.42 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.02 |
Colorado Rockies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-57.6 |
6.5% |
-1.8 |
-21.5 |
29.5 |
$134.1M |
29.5 |
10.0 |
1.73 |
1.80 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.52 |
-1.28 |
-0.39 |
-1.04 |
0.14 |
-0.79 |
0.44 |
0.55 |
-1.29 |
-1.25 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.52 |
-1.28 |
-0.39 |
-1.04 |
0.14 |
0.79 |
0.00 |
0.55 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.25 |
Trevor Rogers, Baltimore Orioles
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
11.1% |
68.6% |
93.8 mph |
28 |
17.9s |
7 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.09 |
0.28 |
1.98 |
-0.18 |
-0.16 |
-0.96 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.17 |
0.14 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.48 |
0.35 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.09 |
Tomoyuki Sugano, Colorado Rockies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
114 |
7.7% |
61.4% |
92.5 mph |
36 |
20.9s |
-3 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.74 |
-1.30 |
-0.97 |
-0.76 |
1.98 |
1.50 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.48 |
-0.65 |
-0.48 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.75 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
0.44 |
Go back to top of page
Athletics @ Texas Rangers, 11:35a
Summary
A low-stakes divisional finale with two shaky rotations and a lopsided Rangers roster edge - watch only if you've got nothing else on. The Athletics arrive banged up and reeling, having dropped five straight, while Texas rolls in on a three-game winning streak and has been winning big lately, including an 8-1 rout the day before. Jacob Lopez takes the ball for Oakland carrying a 5-4 record and 4.82 ERA into his 20th start of the season, and his peripherals back up the modest results - an xFIP- north of 120 drags his pNERD down to a near-replacement 0.96. Cody Bradford isn't much sharper, sitting at 0-3 with a 3.42 ERA, but a strong strike-throwing profile nudges him to a 1.63 pNERD, still nothing to build a watch party around. Texas's tNERD (5.73) clears the Athletics' (1.91) mostly on the strength of positive batting runs and a hefty luck component, meaning positive regression could be coming as the season winds down, though not enough to change the outlook here. With a gNERD of 5.11, well below the historic average of 10.81 and near the bottom of today's slate, this one's easy to skip unless the A's and Rangers are your only rooting interests left in September.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Texas Rangers (2.01); radio, Texas Rangers (2.08)
Athletics
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-37.0 |
7.5% |
-7.0 |
-37.9 |
13.8 |
$135.2M |
28.2 |
23.0 |
1.27 |
1.94 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.96 |
-0.19 |
-1.35 |
-1.82 |
-0.49 |
-0.77 |
-0.71 |
1.25 |
-2.19 |
-0.95 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.96 |
-0.19 |
-1.35 |
-1.82 |
-0.49 |
0.77 |
0.71 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.91 |
Texas Rangers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
18.7 |
7.5% |
-2.5 |
-1.7 |
25.2 |
$201.9M |
30.3 |
40.0 |
2.01 |
2.08 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.55 |
-0.19 |
-0.52 |
-0.09 |
-0.04 |
-0.01 |
1.17 |
2.16 |
-0.74 |
-0.65 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.55 |
-0.19 |
-0.52 |
-0.09 |
-0.04 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.73 |
Jacob Lopez, Athletics
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
121 |
10.6% |
61.7% |
90.4 mph |
28 |
19.8s |
-14 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.15 |
0.05 |
-0.84 |
-1.71 |
-0.16 |
0.60 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-2.31 |
0.02 |
-0.42 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
-0.30 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
0.96 |
Cody Bradford, Texas Rangers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
124 |
7.4% |
68.7% |
88.5 mph |
28 |
19.0s |
-40 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.33 |
-1.44 |
2.04 |
-2.56 |
-0.16 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-2.66 |
-0.72 |
1.02 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
1.63 |
Go back to top of page