MLB: What to watch on June 2, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Cleveland Guardians @ New York Yankees, 4:05p
Summary
This is a pitching-first tug-of-war worth prioritizing: Cam Schlittler’s electric, low-xFIP season and the Yankees’ thumping offense make this the slate’s headline game, even if Cleveland’s Joey Cantillo is a less imposing counter. The numbers explain why the gNERD (15.17) sits at the top of the day — Schlittler’s 1.50 ERA, heavy strikeout profile and mid-to-high‑90s heater underpin his sky-high pNERD (11.40), and he’s delivered multiple 6+ IP, 2-or-fewer-ER outings this year. Cantillo is a competent, lower-variance starter (4–2, 3.57 ERA) whose pNERD (3.07) reflects middling peripherals and below-average velocity, so expect fewer swing‑and‑miss innings from the visitors. Offensively, the Yankees carry the edge — strong run creation and an above‑average barrel/hard‑hit profile that amplifies Schlittler’s margin for error and raises the stakes when he falters. In short: this is a high-watchability, pitcher-versus-power matchup — Schlittler’s dominance makes it a live, low‑scoring chess match that can flip quickly if New York’s bats get one.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Cleveland Guardians (2.16); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -9.2 | 6.2% | -0.1 | 1.7 | 21.6 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 7.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.37 | -1.46 | -0.16 | 0.10 | 0.82 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.48 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.37 | -1.46 | -0.16 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 6.87 |
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 43.1 | 10.8% | 1.7 | 5.1 | 12.6 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -1.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.89 | 1.98 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.07 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.89 | 1.98 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9.01 |
Joey Cantillo, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 11.8% | 61.6% | 91.9 mph | 26 | 18.8s | -23 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.68 | 0.51 | -0.89 | -1.06 | -0.76 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.35 | 0.26 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.07 |
Cam Schlittler, New York Yankees
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 63 | 14.1% | 68.8% | 97.7 mph | 25 | 21.2s | -26 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -2.03 | 1.53 | 2.04 | 1.67 | -1.03 | 1.88 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 4.06 | 0.77 | 1.02 | 1.67 | 1.03 | -0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 11.40 |
San Francisco Giants @ Milwaukee Brewers, 4:40p
Summary
Big-armed, high-upside pitching matchup — two young starters with sky-high pNERD numbers (Kyle Harrison especially) make this a watchable duel even if the Giants’ lineup looks thin. The 13.95 gNERD sits well above both today’s mean and the historical 75th percentile, telling you this is a pitcher-forward game worth prioritizing. Harrison comes in as the steadier electric arm (recent box scores and previews list him among MLB’s best early-season starters), while Trevor McDonald is a volatile, ground-ball rookie who’s been shuttled between Triple-A and the rotation — that background gives the matchup narrative bite. The underlying components explain the intrigue: both starters have excellent xFIP- and strong chase/strike metrics (Harrison’s pace and SwStr/Strike% jump off the sheet), and McDonald’s positive “luck” and youth add upside. Team context drags a bit — San Francisco’s tNERD is low across batting and baserunning, while Milwaukee’s higher tNERD (and bullpen profile) promises more action if the Brewers get to the Giants’ staff. If you want a game where pitching craft and matchup details matter more than fireworks, tune in.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -5.0 | 7.1% | -4.8 | -4.0 | -3.4 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 14.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.19 | -0.79 | -1.89 | -0.48 | -0.99 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.96 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.19 | -0.79 | -1.89 | -0.48 | -0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 2.58 |
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 0.6 | 6.6% | 1.1 | -7.6 | 28.3 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -31.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.05 | -1.16 | 0.29 | -0.86 | 1.31 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -2.12 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.05 | -1.16 | 0.29 | -0.86 | 1.31 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 6.02 |
Trevor McDonald, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 75 | 11.8% | 65.1% | 93.9 mph | 25 | 18.7s | 34 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.34 | 0.51 | 0.54 | -0.12 | -1.03 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.68 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 9.12 |
Kyle Harrison, Milwaukee Brewers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 75 | 13.5% | 67.0% | 94.9 mph | 24 | 17.0s | -36 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.34 | 1.27 | 1.31 | 0.35 | -1.29 | -1.57 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.68 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 1.29 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.20 |
Chicago White Sox @ Minnesota Twins, 4:40p
Summary
This rates as an above‑average watch: a high gNERD (12.49) driven by a lively White Sox lineup and a strong Davis Martin start, versus a Twins staff that looks brittle on paper — so expect a matchup that leans toward the Sox doing the entertaining work. Davis Martin’s pNERD (8.69) reflects legitimately excellent underlying pitching (excellent xFIP- and swing/strike metrics) and a hot 2026 run that’s been noted as a breakout stretch. Connor Prielipp (pNERD 5.13) is the wild card: his surface numbers this year look shaky (1‑3, 5.13 ERA), but his big positive “luck” component suggests some underperformance that could mask better underlying stuff — plus he’s a recent comeback story with prior elbow surgery history, so his floor is uneven. Team NERD splits amplify the tilt: Chicago’s 8.47 tNERD (barrels, young roster) contrasts with Minnesota’s 2.70 (defense and baserunning drags), so gamescript likely favors action from the Sox lineup more than a pitchers’ duel. Overall: pick this one if you like a decisive offense‑tilted viewing with a high‑quality Martin start and a bounce‑back storyline for Prielipp.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 13.5 | 9.5% | -0.7 | 0.5 | 11.8 | $105.8M | 27.1 | 1.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.61 | 1.01 | -0.38 | -0.02 | 0.11 | -1.11 | -1.76 | 0.07 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.61 | 1.01 | -0.38 | -0.02 | 0.11 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.47 |
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.1 | 8.7% | -2.6 | -7.1 | 2.9 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -17.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.28 | 0.41 | -1.08 | -0.80 | -0.53 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -1.16 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.28 | 0.41 | -1.08 | -0.80 | -0.53 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.70 |
Davis Martin, Chicago White Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 70 | 13.1% | 66.9% | 93.7 mph | 29 | 17.8s | -22 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.63 | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.22 | 0.04 | -0.91 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 3.26 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.69 |
Connor Prielipp, Minnesota Twins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 105 | 9.3% | 62.3% | 95.1 mph | 25 | 18.1s | 18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.39 | -0.60 | -0.60 | 0.44 | -1.03 | -0.67 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.78 | -0.30 | -0.30 | 0.44 | 1.03 | 0.33 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.13 |
Texas Rangers @ St. Louis Cardinals, 4:45p
Summary
Worth tuning in: Nathan Eovaldi’s veteran arsenal—and its strong underlying indicators—creates a clearer path to action than the more volatile Dustin May, and the matchup’s gNERD (11.73) sits above both the historic mean (10.11) and today’s average (10.61), so this is a slightly better-than-average watch. Eovaldi’s pNERD is the bigger headline here: his underlying metrics (strong xFIP-relative and strike-generation profile) make him the more reliable source of punchouts and chase, which raises the game’s upside, while May’s surface results have been uneven enough this year that he’s a higher-variance bet on whether the Cardinals’ defense can bail him out. The Cardinals’ tNERD is boosted by standout fielding and youthful profile, whereas the Rangers’ lower team marks are partially offset by a large positive “luck” component—suggesting the Rangers could outpace their box-score indicators soon. The practical result: expect a pitchers’-duel framework with bite—Eovaldi-driven whiffs and a few high-leverage bullpen storylines—rather than an all-out slugfest, making this a smart second- or third-priority game to watch.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, St. Louis Cardinals (2.17); radio, St. Louis Cardinals (2.15)
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -5.9 | 7.9% | -0.8 | 1.8 | 12.0 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 15.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.23 | -0.19 | -0.42 | 0.11 | 0.13 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 1.03 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.23 | -0.19 | -0.42 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.44 |
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -3.3 | 7.6% | 0.8 | 7.9 | 0.2 | $111.2M | 26.9 | -1.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.12 | -0.41 | 0.18 | 0.74 | -0.73 | -1.05 | -1.94 | -0.07 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.12 | -0.41 | 0.18 | 0.74 | -0.73 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.65 |
Nathan Eovaldi, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 81 | 15.1% | 67.0% | 94.1 mph | 36 | 20.2s | 15 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.99 | 1.98 | 1.32 | -0.03 | 1.89 | 1.06 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.99 | 0.99 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.53 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.66 |
Dustin May, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 100 | 9.3% | 64.8% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 21.4s | 15 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.10 | -0.60 | 0.40 | 1.24 | -0.23 | 2.05 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.20 | -0.30 | 0.20 | 1.24 | 0.23 | -1.02 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.70 |
San Diego Padres @ Philadelphia Phillies, 3:40p
Summary
Worth tuning in if you like tidy, strategy-first baseball: the gNERD of 11.56 sits a hair above both the historical median and today’s slate, driven by a high Padres tNERD and a pitcher matchup that features Aaron Nola as a classic “good underlying stuff, unlucky results” candidate. Randy Vásquez is the shakier arm here — his numbers and a 4-run, 5 2/3-inning line in his last turn make him a live target — while Nola’s underlying metrics suggest better outcomes than his surface results so far.
Both clubs have limp offensive profiles (Padres’ batting still poor and Phillies worse), but San Diego’s tNERD is buoyed by very strong fielding, a bullpen component that registers high in the model, and strong broadcaster interest — all things that raise “watchability” even when runs might be scarce. Philadelphia is banged up (J.T. Realmuto day-to-day among other items) and the matchup favors Nola getting some positive regression if his luck flips.
Bottom line: not a guaranteed slugfest, but a satisfying viewing for fans who like pitcher adjustments, bullpen intrigue, and the possibility of Nola turning steady underlying metrics into tangible outs.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -27.5 | 8.5% | 1.0 | 13.4 | 37.0 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -19.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.17 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 1.31 | 1.94 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -1.30 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.17 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 1.31 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.69 |
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.9 | 7.6% | 3.5 | 0.4 | 24.6 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -3.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.36 | -0.41 | 1.17 | -0.03 | 1.04 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.20 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.36 | -0.41 | 1.17 | -0.03 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 5.25 |
Randy Vásquez, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 10.2% | 64.5% | 94.8 mph | 27 | 18.0s | -24 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -0.20 | 0.30 | 0.30 | -0.50 | -0.75 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.12 | -0.10 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.90 |
Aaron Nola, Philadelphia Phillies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 89 | 10.8% | 63.7% | 91.8 mph | 33 | 20.4s | 49 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.53 | 0.07 | -0.01 | -1.11 | 1.10 | 1.22 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.07 | 0.03 | -0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.61 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.29 |
Athletics @ Chicago Cubs, 5:05p
Summary
A reasonably watchable pitching duel on paper — mostly because it’s a live audition: A’s rookie prospect Gage Jump (virtually no MLB track record) against a veteran Jameson Taillon who’s been hittable this year but carries some underlying reasons for optimism. The gNERD sits above both the historical mean and today’s average, driven by a very strong Cubs tNERD (their elite defense and home presentation) and the narrative value of a top prospect on the bump.
Jump is the story: an MLB Pipeline top prospect the A’s just promoted who struggled a bit in his debut (5.0 IP, 9 H, 4 R, 5 K) but flashes swing-and-miss stuff in Triple-A that earned the call. Taillon’s 2–4, 5.37 season line and middling strike/velocity profile make him a middling pNERD (3.20) — he’s been hittable but his peripherals and a noted “luck” component suggest some regression is plausible. The Cubs’ fielding and broadcast factors meaningfully boost watchability; the A’s bring high “luck” (underperforming) and prospect intrigue, so expect an entertaining clash of volatility versus polish more than vintage ace-on-ace arm-wrestling.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 2.1 | 8.3% | -1.7 | -6.9 | 11.0 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 25.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.12 | 0.11 | -0.75 | -0.78 | 0.05 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 1.71 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.12 | 0.11 | -0.75 | -0.78 | 0.05 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.94 |
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.9 | 8.1% | 1.1 | 24.3 | 1.4 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 7.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.98 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 2.43 | -0.64 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.98 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 2.43 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 8.91 |
Gage Jump, Athletics
No detailed stats available
Jameson Taillon, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 115 | 11.0% | 63.2% | 91.8 mph | 34 | 17.9s | 19 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.97 | 0.16 | -0.22 | -1.11 | 1.36 | -0.83 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.93 | 0.08 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.20 |
Miami Marlins @ Washington Nationals, 3:45p
Summary
Watch this if you like small-ball spice and a veteran paint-by-numbers starter — otherwise temper expectations: this matchup’s above-average gNERD (11.34) is driven by two lively team profiles rather than ace-to-ace pitching. The Nationals’ roster-wide tNERD (7.95) reflects a surprisingly potent offense (their batting-run component is strongly positive) while the Marlins bring sneaky baserunning and youth that create game-to-game variance; that mix makes for action even if the starting-pitching axis is subdued.
The pitching side explains the low-ish pNERD: Lake Bachar’s pNERD is 0 because there aren’t meaningful MLB peripherals yet — he’s essentially a recent call-up/prospect reliever with scouting buzz rather than trackable big-league results. Miles Mikolas is the veteran counterpoint: a one-year Nationals signing who eats innings but generates few swings-and-misses and carries a low strikeout profile, though his strong positive “luck” component suggests some room for better results than his surface numbers imply. In short: expect an entertaining, offense-leaning game because of team traits and matchup quirks, not a pitcher’s duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Washington Nationals (2.00); radio, Washington Nationals (2.20)
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -9.8 | 6.3% | 5.7 | -4.2 | 13.6 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 1.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.40 | -1.39 | 1.99 | -0.51 | 0.24 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 0.07 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.40 | -1.39 | 1.99 | -0.51 | 0.24 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.88 |
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 24.9 | 8.9% | 4.6 | -2.5 | -13.1 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -27.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.11 | 0.56 | 1.58 | -0.33 | -1.69 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -1.85 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.11 | 0.56 | 1.58 | -0.33 | -1.69 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.95 |
Lake Bachar, Miami Marlins
No detailed stats available
Miles Mikolas, Washington Nationals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 6.9% | 64.2% | 92.8 mph | 37 | 19.1s | 33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -1.66 | 0.16 | -0.64 | 2.16 | 0.15 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.12 | -0.83 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.85 |
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Arizona Diamondbacks, 6:40p
Summary
Contrast sells: a vulnerable new Dodger (Eric Lauer) who might be better than his surface numbers suggests squares off against a suddenly reliable Michael Soroka, and that mismatch—plus a top-tier Dodgers lineup—makes this an above-average watch. The gNERD of 11.32 is a touch above today’s mean and the long-run average, which fits the matchup: Los Angeles’s team NERD (10.91) towers over Arizona’s (4.73), so you should expect the lineup-versus-starter narrative to drive the action. Soroka’s strong peripheral profile (xFIP- ~84 and a pNERD of 6.27) says he’ll bite into run-scoring, while Lauer’s surface numbers (xFIP- ~128 and a modest pNERD of 0.73) look ugly on paper but come with a large positive “luck” signal—he’s been underperforming and could rebound—so he’s a live underdog story. Add the Dodgers’ high barrel and fielding marks and the D-backs’ quieter offense, and you get a game that’s interesting for pitching matchups and lineup leverage rather than nonstop fireworks. (Lauer’s recent trade and debut and Soroka’s May form are in the previews and team reports.)
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 57.8 | 10.2% | -1.8 | 17.8 | 26.8 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 7.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.53 | 1.53 | -0.79 | 1.76 | 1.20 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.53 | 1.53 | -0.79 | 1.76 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.91 |
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -8.7 | 7.1% | 1.9 | 10.8 | 13.7 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -20.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.35 | -0.79 | 0.58 | 1.04 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -1.37 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.35 | -0.79 | 0.58 | 1.04 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.73 |
Eric Lauer, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 128 | 7.3% | 65.2% | 90.5 mph | 31 | 19.0s | 17 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.71 | -1.48 | 0.57 | -1.72 | 0.57 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -3.43 | -0.74 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.73 |
Michael Soroka, Arizona Diamondbacks
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 84 | 9.8% | 67.2% | 93.6 mph | 28 | 18.7s | -5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.82 | -0.37 | 1.39 | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.64 | -0.19 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.27 |
Toronto Blue Jays @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
Worth watching if you like a clash of steady veteran pitching vs. a heavy, hungry lineup — the Braves’ offense tips the balance, but both starters profile as competent pitchers who can keep the game close. Kevin Gausman’s underlying metrics give him the edge on pedigree and strikeout profile, while Bryce Elder’s season and lightning-quick pace promise a brisk, low-drama duel; the Braves’ stacked team metrics (notably barrels and batting runs) are the real draw. Gausman’s pNERD and xFIP-driven profile suggest he can limit damage against a Blue Jays offense that rates poorly in barrel rate and baserunning, so any small mistakes will be amplified by Atlanta’s lineup. Elder’s solid pNERD and sub-3.00 season ERA make him a real threat, and his rapid pace (16.7s component) will keep viewers from getting bored even if the scoring stays low. The overall gNERD of 11.23 sits above both the historical mean and today’s average, meaning this is a slightly better-than-typical watch — mostly because the Braves’ offense creates a clear “what if” every time Gausman steps off the mound.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -16.6 | 6.5% | -2.2 | 6.4 | 22.3 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 1.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.69 | -1.24 | -0.93 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.07 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.69 | -1.24 | -0.93 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.37 |
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 34.8 | 9.8% | -0.9 | 7.3 | 21.0 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -14.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.53 | 1.23 | -0.45 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -0.96 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.53 | 1.23 | -0.45 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.77 |
Kevin Gausman, Toronto Blue Jays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 82 | 11.8% | 66.3% | 93.9 mph | 35 | 20.3s | -6 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.94 | 0.51 | 1.01 | -0.12 | 1.63 | 1.14 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.87 | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.87 |
Bryce Elder, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 94 | 9.6% | 63.7% | 92.1 mph | 27 | 16.7s | -33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.25 | -0.46 | -0.03 | -0.97 | -0.50 | -1.82 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.49 | -0.23 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.45 |
New York Mets @ Seattle Mariners, 6:40p
Summary
Logan Gilbert’s strong recent run (and a Mets staff missing key bats) makes this quietly watchable rather than must-see — good pitching and roster attrition create a low-key chess match with upside late. Gilbert’s above-average pNERD (6.26) lines up with back-to-back scoreless outings and a 3-4, 3.69-looking season so far, so expect efficient innings and a high floor from Seattle’s side.
The Mets arrive injury-battered —Francisco Lindor, Francisco Álvarez, Luis Robert Jr. and others have been on the mend—so their TBD starter (pNERD 0) injects real uncertainty into the game script; that unknown starter makes the matchup more watchable than a matchup with two locked-in aces because it skews bullpen usage and late-game leverage.
Team-wise the numbers match the vibe: both clubs sit above average on tNERD (Mets 5.35, Mariners 5.75) with Seattle showing solid batting runs and positive “luck” (suggesting upside), while New York’s strong bullpen component promises meaningful action after the sixth. Taken together, this is a pitchers-first game that still offers late-inning drama — tune in for Gilbert, the bullpen chess, and the Mets’ lineup mystery.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -35.2 | 9.2% | -0.6 | -3.4 | 27.1 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -26.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.50 | 0.78 | -0.34 | -0.42 | 1.22 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -1.78 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.50 | 0.78 | -0.34 | -0.42 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 5.35 |
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 19.0 | 8.7% | -0.9 | -11.5 | 17.2 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 14.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.85 | 0.41 | -0.45 | -1.26 | 0.50 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 0.96 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.85 | 0.41 | -0.45 | -1.26 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 5.75 |
Logan Gilbert, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 87 | 12.3% | 65.0% | 95.5 mph | 29 | 20.1s | 8 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.65 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.30 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.63 | 0.00 | -0.49 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.26 |
Pittsburgh Pirates @ Houston Astros, 5:10p
Summary
Not must-see, but worth a glance: a live-armed rookie vs. a quietly unlucky Astros starter, plus a shaky Houston pen that could make late innings interesting. The 10.09 gNERD sits essentially at the historical median and around today's mean, which matches how this feels — not a fireworks show on paper, but a few features could produce drama.
Bubba Chandler brings true juice (98–99 mph heater) and swing-and-miss upside, but his surface peripherals have been rocky, which explains a modest pNERD (he’s a young arm with high velo and inconsistent results). Mike Burrows grades better in pNERD and looks like the more reliable floor: his underlying metrics/xFIP are healthier than his ERA suggests, implying room for positive regression. The Pirates’ above-average tNERD (notably their baserunning) means action on the bases could create extra excitement, while Houston’s bullpen has been a real liability and the club has been managing Josh Hader’s return timetable — both factors that could widen late-game variance.
In short: watch for Chandler’s heater and Burrows’ attempt to buy time; the pen and baserunning are the game’s wildcards.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Houston Astros (1.99)
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 18.1 | 8.0% | 5.6 | -7.2 | 9.7 | $119.1M | 28.8 | -4.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.81 | -0.11 | 1.95 | -0.81 | -0.04 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.27 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.81 | -0.11 | 1.95 | -0.81 | -0.04 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.95 |
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 10.0 | 8.9% | -0.6 | 2.9 | -12.0 | $232.7M | 28.9 | 9.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.34 | 0.23 | -1.61 | 0.34 | -0.16 | 0.62 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.34 | 0.23 | -1.61 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.06 |
Bubba Chandler, Pittsburgh Pirates
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 124 | 10.3% | 62.7% | 98.5 mph | 23 | 20.0s | -7 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.48 | -0.15 | -0.42 | 2.05 | -1.56 | 0.90 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.97 | -0.08 | -0.21 | 2.00 | 1.56 | -0.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.66 |
Mike Burrows, Houston Astros
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 106 | 10.9% | 65.1% | 94.8 mph | 26 | 18.4s | 25 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.45 | 0.11 | 0.52 | 0.30 | -0.76 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.89 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.76 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.50 |
Baltimore Orioles @ Boston Red Sox, 3:45p
Summary
Not a fireworks show, but a tidy pitching contrast worth a look: a high-velocity Shane Baz whose stuff hasn’t fully translated and a young, efficient Connelly Early who profiles as the more watchable arm. The gNERD (9.99) sits around the historical median and a touch below today’s slate, driven by a clear team split — Boston’s tNERD (7.38) leans on elite fielding and a big positive “luck” number that suggests offensive upside, while Baltimore’s lower tNERD (4.80) is propped up by baserunning and bullpen bits. The pitchers tell the story: Baz brings velo and an eye-catching pace problem and low whiff rates that make him boom-or-bust, while Early (younger, cleaner strike%) has been the steadier early-season rotation piece; both are listed as the probables for this game. Taken together, this is a watch for fans who like matchup battles, defensive grabs, and a possible Boston offense rebound — skip it if you want guaranteed strikeouts or a high-scoring slugfest.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 7.4 | 8.1% | 2.1 | -11.3 | 18.9 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -5.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.35 | -0.04 | 0.66 | -1.24 | 0.63 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.34 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.35 | -0.04 | 0.66 | -1.24 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.80 |
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -19.7 | 7.3% | 2.7 | 18.0 | 18.6 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 18.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.83 | -0.64 | 0.88 | 1.78 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 1.23 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.83 | -0.64 | 0.88 | 1.78 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 7.38 |
Shane Baz, Baltimore Orioles
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 8.4% | 63.0% | 96.2 mph | 27 | 21.2s | 6 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.33 | -1.00 | -0.30 | 0.96 | -0.50 | 1.88 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.66 | -0.50 | -0.15 | 0.96 | 0.50 | -0.94 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.31 |
Connelly Early, Boston Red Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 101 | 9.2% | 64.8% | 93.3 mph | 24 | 19.3s | -33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.16 | -0.64 | 0.41 | -0.40 | -1.29 | 0.32 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.32 | -0.32 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.29 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.50 |
Kansas City Royals @ Cincinnati Reds, 4:10p
Summary
Not a marquee showdown, but worth tuning into if you like pitcher-specific storylines: Noah Cameron’s deceptive, quick-paced approach lifts an otherwise middling matchup into something watchable, while Andrew Abbott’s recent surface numbers hide shaky peripherals. The gNERD of 8.45 sits below today’s average, and that’s accurate — both teams’ tNERDs are modest, but Cameron’s pNERD (6.13) supplies the game’s most interesting narrative while Abbott’s low pNERD (1.28) suggests regression risk. Cameron’s youth, brisk pace and positive luck components make him fun to watch — his profile favors contact suppression and quick innings — whereas Abbott’s recent hot May (strong results by ERA) looks at odds with poorer underlying metrics and below-average velocity, so he could be hittable despite recent results. The Royals may also be missing Maikel García (hamstring), which thins their lineup, and the Reds generally fare better versus lefties, giving Cincinnati a matchup edge and the books’ lean.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Kansas City Royals (2.11); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -25.1 | 8.3% | 2.5 | 4.3 | -8.3 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 16.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.06 | 0.11 | 0.80 | 0.37 | -1.35 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 1.10 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.06 | 0.11 | 0.80 | 0.37 | -1.35 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.18 |
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -11.9 | 10.3% | -0.1 | 3.2 | -13.7 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 4.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.49 | 1.61 | -0.16 | 0.26 | -1.74 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.28 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.49 | 1.61 | -0.16 | 0.26 | -1.74 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.32 |
Noah Cameron, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 96 | 10.2% | 63.6% | 92.2 mph | 26 | 16.9s | 12 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.13 | -0.20 | -0.05 | -0.92 | -0.76 | -1.65 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.26 | -0.10 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.13 |
Andrew Abbott, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 120 | 8.7% | 62.3% | 92.8 mph | 27 | 18.4s | -29 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.25 | -0.86 | -0.58 | -0.64 | -0.50 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.51 | -0.43 | -0.29 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 1.28 |
Detroit Tigers @ Tampa Bay Rays, 3:40p
Summary
This is a slow-burn game — more worth an eyebrow raise than full attention: two shaky veterans draw each other in a matchup whose NERD math and recent box-score form both lean low. The gNERD of 5.93 sits well below both the historical mean (~10.1) and today’s average (~10.6), driven by two subpar team NERDs and only modest pitcher intrigue.
Detroit’s offense/defense profile is messy (poor fielding and baserunning but a very large positive “Luck” number, meaning they’ve been underperforming relative to skill and could right themselves), while Tampa Bay shows tidy baserunning and a stingy payroll story that adds mild interest despite a low barrel rate and bullpen marks; together those team numbers keep watchability muted. Jack Flaherty has been struggling for length and a win this season, which dims the ceiling here, though his very high luck suggests some upside bounce; Steven Matz offers the more watchable pitching profile (higher pNERD), helped by an unusually fast pace that keeps the game moving — although he too had a rough May 27 outing. If you want a game that might surprise, watch for whether Flaherty’s luck flips or Matz re-finds consistency; if you want fireworks, this isn’t the most promising box.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -16.0 | 8.8% | -3.6 | -11.3 | 0.2 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 21.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.67 | 0.48 | -1.45 | -1.24 | -0.73 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.44 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.67 | 0.48 | -1.45 | -1.24 | -0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 2.45 |
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 11.7 | 5.3% | 2.8 | -8.5 | -1.6 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 1.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.53 | -2.13 | 0.92 | -0.95 | -0.86 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.53 | -2.13 | 0.92 | -0.95 | -0.86 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.68 |
Jack Flaherty, Detroit Tigers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 112 | 10.2% | 60.9% | 92.4 mph | 30 | 18.6s | 28 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.79 | -0.20 | -1.17 | -0.83 | 0.30 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.58 | -0.10 | -0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.66 |
Steven Matz, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 9.7% | 63.4% | 93.3 mph | 35 | 15.3s | 4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -0.42 | -0.14 | -0.40 | 1.63 | -2.97 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.12 | -0.21 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.08 |
Colorado Rockies @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
Not a must-watch: this is essentially the day’s low-energy option — gNERD 3.18 sits near the bottom of both today’s and historical ranges, and the matchup math explains why. The teams bring almost nothing to the table (average tNERD 1.01) — Colorado’s offense has been dreadful and the Angels’ defense and bullpen are liabilities — so the game’s entertainment hinge becomes starting pitching, and neither starter sells tickets. Sugano, who signed with the Rockies this winter and profiles as a low-walk, homer-vulnerable veteran, has the measurable concerns (weak chase/whiff numbers and elevated xFIP components). Grayson Rodríguez arrives via the offseason trade and has yet to provide a reason to expect fireworks; public previews list a high ERA and limited upside so far with his new club. With Sugano’s pNERD negative and Rodríguez’s pNERD essentially zero (no detailed edge data), plus both teams’ tNERD near the bottom, this looks like a pitchers’-duel-that-isn’t: watch only if you enjoy low-scoring slog and spot-start roster narratives rather than crisp, high-variance action.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Los Angeles Angels (2.01)
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -39.6 | 6.6% | -1.2 | -2.9 | 17.3 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 4.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.69 | -1.16 | -0.56 | -0.37 | 0.51 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.28 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.69 | -1.16 | -0.56 | -0.37 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1.79 |
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.0 | 9.4% | -4.8 | -16.3 | -10.3 | $191.6M | 28.6 | 2.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.41 | 0.93 | -1.89 | -1.75 | -1.49 | -0.13 | -0.39 | 0.14 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.41 | 0.93 | -1.89 | -1.75 | -1.49 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 0.24 |
Tomoyuki Sugano, Colorado Rockies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 119 | 6.9% | 61.5% | 92.3 mph | 36 | 20.8s | -32 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.20 | -1.66 | -0.92 | -0.88 | 1.89 | 1.55 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.39 | -0.83 | -0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | -0.66 |
Grayson Rodriguez, Los Angeles Angels
No detailed stats available
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on June 1, 2026