MLB: What to watch on June 3, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Cleveland Guardians @ New York Yankees, 4:05p
Summary
This one’s worth your eyeballs: a sky-high gNERD (15.56) thanks to Gavin Williams’ outlier pNERD and a Yankees lineup that’s built to punish mistakes, while Gerrit Cole’s pNERD reads as missing data even though he’s back in form. The numbers say watchability — Williams’ pNERD (10.02) is driven by an excellent xFIP- and above-average velo and chase rates, so expect swing-and-miss stuff that creates strikeout entertainment; the Yankees’ tNERD (9.05) is powered by top-tier batting runs and barrel rate, so any mistake will be punished. MLB’s previews list Williams vs. Cole as the probable matchup and note Cole’s recent strong outing (6 2/3 scoreless with 10 K’s in his return), which adds narrative tension: a dominant young Guardians arm against a Yankees staff ace who’s re-establishing himself. The wild card: Cole’s pNERD shows 0.00 (no input data for this metric), so the pitching story is partly statistical mystery versus recent on-field performance. If you like high-leverage strikeout battles with a high-scoring offense lurking, this is a priority game; if you prefer low-scoring chess, skip it.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Cleveland Guardians (2.16); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -6.3 | 6.2% | 0.4 | 0.6 | 24.3 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 5.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.25 | -1.47 | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.94 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.34 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.25 | -1.47 | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.94 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 7.04 |
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 42.3 | 10.7% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 14.6 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -2.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.86 | 1.94 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.14 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.86 | 1.94 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9.05 |
Gavin Williams, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 74 | 13.6% | 67.7% | 96.3 mph | 26 | 18.6s | 1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.41 | 1.30 | 1.60 | 1.01 | -0.76 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.82 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 1.01 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.02 |
Gerrit Cole, New York Yankees
No detailed stats available
San Diego Padres @ Philadelphia Phillies, 3:40p
Summary
This is a pitcher-forward game worth tuning into: Cristopher Sánchez is legitimately rolling right now and his sky-high pNERD (10.18) makes him the main draw, while Walker Buehler offers a tempting counter-narrative — talented arm, middling surface results, and glaring positive “luck” that suggests a bounce-back. MLB lists Sánchez and Buehler as the probables for this matchup. Sánchez’s underlying metrics here line up with the hype: his pNERD is dominated by an elite xFIP- (57) and above-average swing‑and‑miss and strike rates, and he’s been on a notable scoreless run this season per the Phillies’ reports. Buehler’s season has been uneven (mid‑4s ERA in previews and game trackers), and his low SwStr/Strike components in the pNERD suggest he’s not missing bats like his best years — but his huge positive Luck component means regression toward his pedigree is plausible, which makes every plate appearance tense. The Padres’ high tNERD is driven by excellent glovework, a beefy bullpen component, and strong broadcaster ratings, so this shapes up as a contrast: Sánchez trying to overpower a well‑rounded Padres club while Buehler tries to flip his fortune. Given a gNERD of 14.11 (well above historical and today’s averages), this is one of the more watchable games on the slate.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -29.8 | 8.5% | 1.1 | 14.4 | 36.7 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -18.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.27 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 1.37 | 1.79 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -1.25 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.27 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 1.37 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.55 |
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -31.9 | 7.6% | 3.4 | -1.4 | 26.2 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -1.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.36 | -0.41 | 1.09 | -0.22 | 1.07 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.07 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.36 | -0.41 | 1.09 | -0.22 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 5.01 |
Walker Buehler, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 96 | 7.5% | 62.0% | 93.9 mph | 31 | 17.8s | 28 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.14 | -1.39 | -0.73 | -0.12 | 0.57 | -0.91 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.28 | -0.69 | -0.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.48 |
Cristopher Sánchez, Philadelphia Phillies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 57 | 15.1% | 67.2% | 95.0 mph | 29 | 20.1s | -21 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -2.39 | 1.96 | 1.42 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 4.79 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.00 | -0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.18 |
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Arizona Diamondbacks, 6:40p
Summary
Watchable — Shohei Ohtani's two-way upside and the Dodgers' league-leading team profile make this one of the day’s better TV choices, even if Zac Gallen’s middling peripherals keep it from being a true pitching duel. Ohtani arrives as the clear spice: he’s slated to both pitch and hit, has been dominant recently (league-leading numbers among qualified pitchers), and brings high velocity and swing-and-miss that drive his strong pNERD. The Dodgers’ tNERD (10.78) is essentially off-the-charts for today, driven by elite batting runs, barreling, and plus defense — so expect action when their lineup gets to Gallen. The D-backs’ Zac Gallen profiles as the less enticing arm: his xFIP and SwStr% explain a low pNERD, though his positive “luck” suggests results could improve from recent stop-and-start performance. In short: this is a high-watchability game because of Ohtani and a top-tier Dodgers roster; Gallen’s ebbs make outcomes uncertain rather than boring, so it’s worth prioritizing for viewers who like potential offense with a legit ace on the mound.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 58.1 | 10.1% | -2.0 | 18.2 | 27.0 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 7.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.55 | 1.48 | -0.79 | 1.75 | 1.12 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.55 | 1.48 | -0.79 | 1.75 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.78 |
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.8 | 7.0% | 1.8 | 12.0 | 14.2 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -19.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.31 | -0.86 | 0.53 | 1.13 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -1.32 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.31 | -0.86 | 0.53 | 1.13 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.72 |
Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 80 | 13.9% | 64.4% | 97.6 mph | 31 | 18.2s | -60 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.06 | 1.43 | 0.27 | 1.63 | 0.57 | -0.58 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.13 | 0.72 | 0.14 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 8.70 |
Zac Gallen, Arizona Diamondbacks
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 107 | 8.6% | 63.0% | 93.5 mph | 30 | 18.7s | 18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.50 | -0.90 | -0.29 | -0.31 | 0.30 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.00 | -0.45 | -0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.19 |
Miami Marlins @ Washington Nationals, 10:05a
Summary
Worth watching: this one has the feel of a quietly spicy pitching duel that could break into chaos — gNERD 12.79 sits well above the day’s average and nudges past the historical 75th percentile, driven by two fairly lively team NERDs and a strong pNERD for Max Meyer. Max Meyer’s recent run (excellent May and a one‑hit outing earlier this month) gives the Marlins an upper hand from the bump, and his pNERD (6.06) flags swing-and-miss stuff and strike-throwing control that usually keeps games tight. The Nationals counter with Andrew Alvarez, whose pNERD is 0 here (the model lacks enough pitcher-level inputs), but he’s a recalled lefty with MLB experience — a wild card rather than a headline act. Both teams’ tNERDs (~7.2 each) suggest active offenses and baserunning that can turn a pitchers’ duel into action, while Washington’s bullpen has been a real dampener recently, increasing the chance of late swings. Depth moves and transaction notes (Marlins activation/IL items) slightly tweak matchups but don’t flip the script. Overall: pick this for a game that’s quietly high-quality and likely to reward viewers who like pitcher-versus-lineup chess that can blow up into messy, watchable late innings.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Washington Nationals (2.00); radio, Washington Nationals (2.20)
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -7.8 | 6.4% | 5.8 | -4.4 | 16.4 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 2.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.31 | -1.32 | 1.92 | -0.52 | 0.39 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 0.14 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.31 | -1.32 | 1.92 | -0.52 | 0.39 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.18 |
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 21.4 | 8.8% | 4.2 | -1.4 | -18.0 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -29.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.96 | 0.50 | 1.37 | -0.22 | -1.98 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -2.01 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.96 | 0.50 | 1.37 | -0.22 | -1.98 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.35 |
Max Meyer, Miami Marlins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 88 | 13.4% | 64.3% | 94.6 mph | 27 | 19.8s | -16 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.60 | 1.21 | 0.22 | 0.21 | -0.50 | 0.74 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.20 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.50 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.06 |
Andrew Alvarez, Washington Nationals
No detailed stats available
Kansas City Royals @ Cincinnati Reds, 4:10p
Summary
Watch for Chase Burns — this is a fastball-and-miss showcase with real teeth; the game’s above-average gNERD (12.46) is driven by Burns’ 10.90 pNERD and edge-of-your-seat velocity. Stephen Kolek’s start makes it less one-sided: his moderate pNERD (4.58) and recent return from the IL — including a surprise nine-inning shutout at Coors — give the Royals an outside chance to hang around. Burns’ profile (mid-to-upper 90s, swing-and-miss stuff that’s playing up) is exactly the kind that produces high-leverage strikeout innings and low-event baseball that still entertains when hitters try — and fail — to catch up. The Reds’ higher tNERD (5.32) is buoyed by a strong barrel rate, while both teams’ bullpens look brittle, which opens the door for late-game action despite a probable starting-pitcher tilt. The Royals’ big positive “Luck” suggests they may actually get a bit luckier offensively, but the headline is Burns: watch if you like hard stuff, chase-of-the-plate strikeouts, and the tense inevitability that comes with a starter this good.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Kansas City Royals (2.11); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -27.3 | 8.3% | 3.3 | 4.4 | -12.0 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 16.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.16 | 0.12 | 1.05 | 0.36 | -1.57 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 1.10 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.16 | 0.12 | 1.05 | 0.36 | -1.57 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.13 |
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -14.5 | 10.3% | 0.3 | 2.5 | -13.4 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 3.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.60 | 1.63 | 0.01 | 0.17 | -1.66 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.21 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.60 | 1.63 | 0.01 | 0.17 | -1.66 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.32 |
Stephen Kolek, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 95 | 8.7% | 65.3% | 93.9 mph | 29 | 17.7s | -13 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.20 | -0.86 | 0.63 | -0.12 | 0.03 | -0.99 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.39 | -0.43 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.58 |
Chase Burns, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 78 | 15.2% | 62.6% | 98.1 mph | 23 | 17.6s | -32 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.18 | 2.00 | -0.45 | 1.86 | -1.56 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.36 | 1.00 | -0.23 | 1.86 | 1.56 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.90 |
New York Mets @ Seattle Mariners, 12:40p
Summary
This is a solid, slightly above-average watch: George Kirby’s steadiness and strike-throwing profile versus Freddy Peralta’s swing‑for‑the‑fences stuff creates a clear contrast that should produce competitive, watchable innings. The gNERD of 11.51 sits above today’s mean, and the matchup reads like a classic pitcher-identity duel — Kirby (pNERD 7.63) profiles as the more reliable, high‑strike% arm with a sub‑100 xFIP- and lively velo, the sort who eats innings and keeps the game tidy; previews list him as Seattle’s probable starter with quality surface metrics this season. Peralta (pNERD 4.42) gives the Mets high-leverage swing-and-miss upside but has been used in shorter stints since the trade that brought him to New York, which limits the ceiling for a long, dominant outing. Team NERDs back this up: Seattle’s offense (positive batting runs) plus shaky defense suggests runs can sneak in, while New York’s bullpen is a clear strength — a late-inning chess match is likely. Overall: tune in for Kirby’s command and the bullpen/lineup contrasts more than expecting a complete-game masterpiece.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -36.6 | 9.2% | -0.5 | -1.4 | 25.5 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -26.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.56 | 0.80 | -0.27 | -0.22 | 1.02 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -1.80 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.56 | 0.80 | -0.27 | -0.22 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 5.39 |
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 22.9 | 8.8% | -2.4 | -11.6 | 18.3 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 14.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.02 | 0.50 | -0.93 | -1.24 | 0.52 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 0.97 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.02 | 0.50 | -0.93 | -1.24 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 5.57 |
Freddy Peralta, New York Mets
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 94 | 11.6% | 61.8% | 94.0 mph | 30 | 18.2s | -4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.25 | 0.42 | -0.77 | -0.08 | 0.30 | -0.58 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.51 | 0.21 | -0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.42 |
George Kirby, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 87 | 10.1% | 66.9% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 18.9s | 10 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.66 | -0.24 | 1.31 | 1.25 | -0.23 | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.32 | -0.12 | 0.65 | 1.25 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.63 |
Baltimore Orioles @ Boston Red Sox, 3:45p
Summary
Watch if you like young arms with swing-and-miss stuff on full display; Payton Tolle’s numbers and profile make this a live, must-see matchup even though veteran Chris Bassitt’s season has been decidedly ordinary.
Tolle’s huge pNERD (10.03) correctly flags a 23-year-old lefty with above-average velo, strike rate and chase/swing metrics who the Sox have cycled between Triple-A and Boston this year — he’s the kind of prospect-start that creates high-leverage viewing. Bassitt’s low pNERD (0.65) reflects lost strike stuff, a falling xFIP- and creeping pace/velocity issues, so his starts are more about management than flash. Boston’s higher tNERD (7.08) is buoyed by excellent fielding runs and a large positive luck component (suggesting room to improve), while Baltimore’s middling team profile and poor fielding trim the scoring upside — together that lands the game at an above-average gNERD (11.45). The game’s appeal is straightforward: young-power lefty vs. veteran contact arm, plus a defense-versus-variance subplot that could tilt this from “watchable” to “must-watch” if Tolle is sharp.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 8.6 | 8.1% | 2.4 | -9.6 | 19.9 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -3.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.40 | -0.03 | 0.74 | -1.04 | 0.63 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.21 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.40 | -0.03 | 0.74 | -1.04 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.14 |
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -22.2 | 7.2% | 2.6 | 18.2 | 20.1 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 17.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.94 | -0.71 | 0.81 | 1.75 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 1.17 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.94 | -0.71 | 0.81 | 1.75 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 7.08 |
Chris Bassitt, Baltimore Orioles
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 116 | 8.9% | 61.4% | 91.8 mph | 37 | 20.5s | 8 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.02 | -0.77 | -0.94 | -1.12 | 2.16 | 1.31 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.04 | -0.38 | -0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.66 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.65 |
Payton Tolle, Boston Red Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 85 | 13.4% | 68.8% | 95.9 mph | 23 | 17.3s | -25 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.77 | 1.21 | 2.05 | 0.82 | -1.56 | -1.32 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.55 | 0.61 | 1.03 | 0.82 | 1.56 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.03 |
Pittsburgh Pirates @ Houston Astros, 5:10p
Summary
This is a pitcher’s duel with a twist: Paul Skenes is the headline — elite velocity and a very high pNERD — but Spencer Arrighetti has been quietly excellent lately, so the early innings should be compelling. Skenes (pNERD 10.10) brings the kind of fastball jump and young‑ace profile that makes every two‑strike count feel consequential (xFIP‑ and velocity both lean favorable), while Arrighetti’s recent form — including a five‑scoreless outing at Wrigley and strong strikeout work — means the Astros aren’t sending out a patsy. Pittsburgh’s edge in team metrics (tNERD 7.57) comes from above‑average batting runs and excellent baserunning, which should pressure Houston into high‑leverage bullpen decisions; Houston’s low tNERD (3.93) and a noticeably shaky relief corps make the late innings the most watchable part. With a gNERD of 11.10 — a hair above today’s mean — this isn’t a can’t‑miss, but it’s worth prioritizing if you like watching dominant young arms matched with the possibility of late‑game bullpen drama.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Houston Astros (1.99)
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 23.2 | 8.2% | 6.5 | -7.5 | 10.6 | $119.1M | 28.8 | -3.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.03 | 0.05 | 2.17 | -0.83 | -0.01 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.21 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.03 | 0.05 | 2.17 | -0.83 | -0.01 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.57 |
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 10.1 | 8.8% | -0.7 | 3.3 | -12.2 | $232.7M | 28.9 | 7.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.34 | 0.25 | -1.58 | 0.34 | -0.16 | 0.48 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.34 | 0.25 | -1.58 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.93 |
Paul Skenes, Pittsburgh Pirates
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 73 | 12.1% | 65.3% | 97.1 mph | 24 | 18.8s | -3 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.47 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.39 | -1.30 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.94 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 1.39 | 1.30 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.10 |
Spencer Arrighetti, Houston Astros
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 120 | 9.5% | 60.8% | 92.5 mph | 26 | 20.4s | -88 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.25 | -0.51 | -1.21 | -0.79 | -0.76 | 1.23 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -2.50 | -0.25 | -0.61 | 0.00 | 0.76 | -0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 0.59 |
Athletics @ Chicago Cubs, 5:05p
Summary
This is a middling-but-watchable tilt: it’s a pitcher-first game where the Cubs’ glovework and the A’s oddball “positive luck” story make for low-drama intrigue rather than fireworks. The gNERD (10.64) sits essentially at today’s mean, driven more by team profiles (Cubs tNERD 8.40) than by the starters (both pNERD ~3.5), so expect a contest won by defense and sequencing rather than dominant strikeout pitching. Chicago brings elite fielding (huge fielding-runs component) and healthy broadcast interest, while Oakland’s big positive Luck score implies they’ve been underperforming their peripherals and could score above expectations. Jeffrey Springs carries the hip-soreness narrative but was reported cleared to make his next start after a precautionary exit; he profiles as a crafty, contact-limiter with modest strikeout upside. Colin Rea has been a swingman-turned-starter for the Cubs and showed competent length in a recent outing, making him a safe, innings-eating counter. If you prefer low-variance, defense-decided games with a soft-throwing southpaw vs. veteran innings-eater, this is worth tuning to; if you want high-octane offense or swing-for-the-fences starters, pass.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -0.4 | 8.3% | -1.8 | -7.4 | 11.1 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 24.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.01 | 0.12 | -0.73 | -0.82 | 0.03 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 1.66 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.01 | 0.12 | -0.73 | -0.82 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.75 |
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 17.7 | 8.1% | 0.2 | 25.0 | 2.1 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 6.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.79 | -0.03 | -0.03 | 2.43 | -0.59 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.79 | -0.03 | -0.03 | 2.43 | -0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 8.40 |
Jeffrey Springs, Athletics
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 10.4% | 65.3% | 91.4 mph | 33 | 19.5s | -7 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.21 | -0.11 | 0.65 | -1.31 | 1.10 | 0.49 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.42 | -0.05 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.41 |
Colin Rea, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 9.1% | 63.4% | 93.6 mph | 35 | 18.1s | 13 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.32 | -0.68 | -0.15 | -0.26 | 1.63 | -0.66 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.65 | -0.34 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.72 |
San Francisco Giants @ Milwaukee Brewers, 4:40p
Summary
Worth a look if you like pitching intrigue: Logan Webb’s above-average pNERD and a Brewers starter listed as “TBD” promise either a traditional Webb duel or a bullpen chess match that could get lively. The numbers say middling overall (gNERD 10.03, right near the long-term mean) but the matchup skew—low Giants tNERD (2.52) versus a stronger Brewers tNERD (6.08)—and Webb’s 6.46 pNERD make this more a pitcher-driven watch than an offensive showcase.
Webb brings the underlying stuff (solid xFIP- and a big positive luck component that suggests better results could be coming) even if his strike-swing/velocity profile is less intimidating; he’s also come off a recent knee issue that’s been monitored. The Giants’ roster has had fresh injury churn, weakening depth and making their low tNERD sensible. The Brewers are riding a stout bullpen and woke-up offense (they hammered the Giants recently), so if Milwaukee doesn’t announce a traditional starter this tilt could turn into high-leverage, late-inning action—exactly the sort of thing that pushes a borderline gNERD into must-watch territory.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -5.3 | 7.1% | -5.3 | -5.3 | -3.9 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 16.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.20 | -0.79 | -1.94 | -0.61 | -1.01 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 1.10 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.20 | -0.79 | -1.94 | -0.61 | -1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 2.52 |
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 4.0 | 6.6% | 0.8 | -7.3 | 29.3 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -30.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.20 | -1.17 | 0.18 | -0.81 | 1.28 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.20 | -1.17 | 0.18 | -0.81 | 1.28 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 6.08 |
Logan Webb, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 85 | 9.3% | 64.5% | 92.4 mph | 29 | 18.3s | 36 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.77 | -0.59 | 0.31 | -0.83 | 0.03 | -0.50 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.55 | -0.30 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.46 |
Texas Rangers @ St. Louis Cardinals, 4:45p
Summary
Not a can't-miss pitching duel, but a quietly watchable matchup: MacKenzie Gore’s uptick in stuff meets a Cardinals club built to save runs with defense, and the Rangers’ hot streak plus big positive “luck” make this one worth a look. MLB lists Gore and Andre Pallante as the probables for June 3, confirming the matchup.
Gore (pNERD 4.38) brings the better strike-raw profile here — above-average velocity and a recent strong debut with Texas — but his swinging-strike and strike-rate components are muted, so the upside is quality contact and length rather than overpowering blowouts. Pallante (pNERD 3.46) is a league-average-to-tilted-toward-tough-starts arm (higher xFIP-, slower pace), which suggests a lower-strikeout, pitch-to-contact game.
St. Louis’ tNERD (7.10) is driven by elite fielding runs and a younger, cheaper roster that typically yields tight, low-run environments — exactly the sort of setting that suppresses fireworks but rewards situational play. The Rangers’ tNERD is softer, but a large positive Luck component implies they’ve been underperforming their peripherals and could be due for more offense. All told, gNERD 9.60 sits a hair below today’s game average, so prioritize this if you prefer controlled, defense-first contests with a bit of bounce-back storyline — not a guaranteed slugfest.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, St. Louis Cardinals (2.17); radio, St. Louis Cardinals (2.15)
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -5.7 | 7.8% | -0.7 | 1.2 | 13.6 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 12.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.22 | -0.26 | -0.34 | 0.04 | 0.20 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.83 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.22 | -0.26 | -0.34 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.26 |
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -2.3 | 7.6% | 0.8 | 10.0 | 1.3 | $111.2M | 26.9 | 2.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.07 | -0.41 | 0.18 | 0.93 | -0.65 | -1.05 | -1.94 | 0.14 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.07 | -0.41 | 0.18 | 0.93 | -0.65 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.10 |
MacKenzie Gore, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 98 | 10.6% | 62.5% | 95.3 mph | 27 | 19.5s | -1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.50 | 0.54 | -0.50 | 0.49 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.05 | -0.01 | -0.25 | 0.54 | 0.50 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 4.38 |
Andre Pallante, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 9.3% | 63.6% | 95.1 mph | 27 | 20.2s | 2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.27 | -0.59 | -0.05 | 0.45 | -0.50 | 1.07 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.53 | -0.30 | -0.02 | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.53 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.46 |
Toronto Blue Jays @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
Not must-see TV: a gNERD of 8.92 puts this below both today’s average and the historic median, but it isn’t boring—Atlanta’s big-offense profile sets up an interesting contrast with two modestly rated starters. MLB’s probables list Patrick Corbin for Toronto and Grant Holmes for Atlanta, confirming the matchup you provided.
The watchability split is simple: Atlanta’s tNERD (7.57) is driven by elite batting runs and barrel rate, while Toronto’s tNERD (3.30) flags poor barrel rate and baserunning, so the game’s upside comes from Atlanta chasing barrels more than from pitching fireworks. Corbin’s pNERD is subdued (2.97)—the components show a low whiff and below-average velocity—yet he’s been stringing together reasonably limited-run outings recently, which makes him serviceable. Holmes (pNERD 3.99) grades a touch higher thanks to better swing‑and‑miss metrics, but neither starter approaches today’s pitcher-nerd mean, so expect a lineup-driven game rather than a classic duel.
Bottom line: watch if you care about Atlanta’s offense or want bullpen leverage; skip if you want high‑variance starting‑pitching drama.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -17.0 | 6.5% | -2.3 | 5.7 | 22.6 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 2.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.71 | -1.24 | -0.90 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.14 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.71 | -1.24 | -0.90 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.30 |
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 33.3 | 9.7% | -1.1 | 6.5 | 22.6 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -15.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.47 | 1.18 | -0.48 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -1.04 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.47 | 1.18 | -0.48 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.57 |
Patrick Corbin, Toronto Blue Jays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 8.7% | 62.4% | 91.3 mph | 36 | 18.2s | -14 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.21 | -0.86 | -0.54 | -1.35 | 1.90 | -0.58 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.42 | -0.43 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.97 |
Grant Holmes, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 101 | 13.2% | 62.9% | 94.3 mph | 30 | 18.8s | -5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.15 | 1.12 | -0.36 | 0.07 | 0.30 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.30 | 0.56 | -0.18 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.99 |
Chicago White Sox @ Minnesota Twins, 10:40a
Summary
Not a marquee showdown — more of a one-sided chess match with one flashy knight and one tired rook. The gNERD (8.74) sits below both today's average and the long-run mean, so this is a modestly watchable game driven almost entirely by a strong Taj Bradley vs. a shaky Erick Fedde.
Bradley is the main draw: a 25-year-old with above-average velocity and surface metrics this year, a high pNERD (6.84) that signals true swing-and-miss and strikeout upside, and a recent stretch of effective starts (he even had a short IL scare in May but returned to form). That combination makes any Twins start he’s in worth tuning to.
Fedde’s profile pulls the opposite direction — a negative pNERD driven by a poor xFIP- and very low whiff/strike rates, so don’t expect an ace duel; he’s the version of a starter likely to turn a promising pitch sequence into a long inning. The White Sox’s tNERD (8.54) suggests they have the batted‑ball juice to threaten, while Minnesota’s low tNERD (2.85) reflects defensive and baserunning shortcomings that lower the game’s overall intrigue.
Bottom line: tune in if you want to watch Bradley’s electric stuff and see whether the White Sox’s young, barreling lineup can solve a swing‑and‑miss arm; otherwise this is a lower-tier option on the day’s slate.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, Chicago White Sox (2.57)
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 12.3 | 9.4% | -0.1 | 0.5 | 12.4 | $105.8M | 27.1 | 0.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | 0.95 | -0.13 | -0.03 | 0.12 | -1.11 | -1.76 | -0.00 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.56 | 0.95 | -0.13 | -0.03 | 0.12 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.54 |
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -6.1 | 8.5% | -2.6 | -6.7 | 4.6 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -18.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.24 | 0.27 | -1.00 | -0.75 | -0.42 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -1.25 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.24 | 0.27 | -1.00 | -0.75 | -0.42 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.85 |
Erick Fedde, Chicago White Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 129 | 6.6% | 59.5% | 93.7 mph | 33 | 17.2s | 1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.77 | -1.78 | -1.73 | -0.22 | 1.10 | -1.41 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -3.54 | -0.89 | -0.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 3.80 | -0.74 |
Taj Bradley, Minnesota Twins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 89 | 11.8% | 62.3% | 96.7 mph | 25 | 19.5s | -12 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.54 | 0.51 | -0.57 | 1.20 | -1.03 | 0.49 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.09 | 0.25 | -0.28 | 1.20 | 1.03 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.84 |
Detroit Tigers @ Tampa Bay Rays, 10:10a
Summary
Not a must-watch: the gNERD of 7.08 lands this Tigers–Rays tilt well below both today’s game average (10.88) and the historical mean (10.11), mostly because both clubs register low tNERD marks and one starter’s pNERD is missing. The numbers say you shouldn’t expect fireworks: both teams score poorly on team-level entertainment drivers (Detroit 3.01, Tampa Bay 2.50), so the game’s low watchability is driven by shallow offensive/defensive profiles rather than a marquee pitching duel.
That said, there’s a storyline worth a glance: Detroit’s Troy Melton is a touted young arm who was just activated from the 60-day IL and delivered a strong season debut after the injury layoff, which adds a developmental angle even though the NERD feed shows pNERD = 0 (no pitcher data available). Nick Martinez is the steadier, veteran arm for Tampa Bay (a one-year signing to help the rotation), and his modest pNERD (3.65) reflects a pitcher who can keep the game competitive but not necessarily electric. Bottom line: watch if you care about a prospect’s return and stable veteran pitching; skip if you want offense, strikeout fireworks, or an obvious bullpen showdown.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -12.6 | 9.0% | -3.6 | -11.1 | 1.4 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 21.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.52 | 0.65 | -1.35 | -1.19 | -0.64 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 1.45 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.52 | 0.65 | -1.35 | -1.19 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.45 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 3.01 |
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 9.0 | 5.3% | 2.6 | -7.9 | -2.9 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 2.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.42 | -2.15 | 0.81 | -0.87 | -0.94 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.14 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.42 | -2.15 | 0.81 | -0.87 | -0.94 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.50 |
Troy Melton, Detroit Tigers
No detailed stats available
Nick Martinez, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 8.4% | 67.5% | 92.6 mph | 35 | 18.9s | -63 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.21 | -0.99 | 1.52 | -0.74 | 1.63 | -0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.42 | -0.49 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.65 |
Colorado Rockies @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
This is a low-priority game — a gNERD of 5.53 sits at the bottom of today's slate and, by the provided historical context, near the very low end of what usually makes a game watchable. Still, there's a sliver of intrigue because Walbert Ureña's young, high-velocity profile gives the contest some upside while Michael Lorenzen's big positive luck number suggests he might not be as doomed as recent outcomes imply. The two teams' tNERDs are miserable — both offenses and defenses are underwhelming, which suppresses natural scoring drama; Colorado's lineup has been especially quiet while the Angels' defense and bullpen have been liabilities. Michael Lorenzen has been streaky this season after signing a one-year deal and has had rough outings, but his very positive luck component hints at better expected performance than his raw results show. Walbert Ureña, a 22-year-old with high mid-90s velocity and several strong strikeout outings since his 2026 debut, is the primary reason to watch: he can miss bats and create tense at-bats even if the rest of the game feels flat.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Los Angeles Angels (2.01)
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -36.7 | 6.6% | -1.4 | -3.4 | 18.2 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 6.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.57 | -1.17 | -0.59 | -0.42 | 0.52 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.41 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.57 | -1.17 | -0.59 | -0.42 | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1.98 |
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.6 | 9.5% | -5.1 | -18.5 | -9.3 | $191.6M | 28.6 | 3.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.43 | 1.03 | -1.88 | -1.93 | -1.38 | -0.13 | -0.39 | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.43 | 1.03 | -1.88 | -1.93 | -1.38 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 0.33 |
Michael Lorenzen, Colorado Rockies
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 108 | 8.6% | 62.5% | 94.0 mph | 34 | 18.8s | 48 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.56 | -0.90 | -0.49 | -0.08 | 1.37 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.11 | -0.45 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.04 |
Walbert Ureña, Los Angeles Angels
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 107 | 11.8% | 60.0% | 97.7 mph | 22 | 19.1s | -49 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.50 | 0.51 | -1.54 | 1.68 | -1.83 | 0.16 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.00 | 0.25 | -0.77 | 1.68 | 1.83 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.71 |
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on June 2, 2026