MLB: What to watch on July 8, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Milwaukee Brewers @ St. Louis Cardinals, 4:45p
Summary
Watch this one for Kyle Harrison — everything about the matchup screams strikeout fiesta vs. contact-oriented resistance, and the gNERD (14.60) puts it at the top of the board today. Harrison’s juicy pNERD (10.75) isn’t just a number: he’s been racking up Ks since joining Milwaukee and has multiple high-strikeout outings this season, so expect swing-and-miss stuff and plenty of high-leverage batting practice for the Cardinals. Michael McGreevy’s lower pNERD (3.73) reflects less whiff profile and a tendency to induce contact — he’s shown flashes (a six‑no‑hit‑inning outing earlier this year) but has gotten fewer strikeouts, so this game shapes up as a classic contrast between elite K upside and contact management. Both clubs have above-average tNERDs (Brewers 7.70, Cardinals 7.02), with Milwaukee’s bullpen and young roster tilt adding volatility late in the game. In short: if you like pitch‑to‑contact chess interrupted by occasional blowup innings driven by Harrison’s heater, prioritize this; if you want steady, low-event baseball, lower your expectations.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Milwaukee Brewers (2.66); radio, Milwaukee Brewers (2.56)
Milwaukee Brewers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 17.9 | 7.1% | 2.9 | -5.3 | 38.5 | $139.3M | 27.7 | -22.0 | 2.66 | 2.56 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.63 | -0.78 | 0.61 | -0.33 | 1.19 | -0.73 | -1.21 | -1.36 | 0.53 | 0.37 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.63 | -0.78 | 0.61 | -0.33 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 4.00 | 7.70 |
St. Louis Cardinals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -2.2 | 7.5% | 1.4 | 14.0 | 3.6 | $111.2M | 26.9 | -7.0 | 2.17 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.04 | -0.41 | 0.26 | 0.94 | -0.72 | -1.05 | -1.94 | -0.43 | -0.43 | -0.50 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.04 | -0.41 | 0.26 | 0.94 | -0.72 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.02 |
Kyle Harrison, Milwaukee Brewers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 72 | 13.5% | 66.5% | 95.1 mph | 24 | 16.8s | -5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.58 | 1.37 | 1.07 | 0.42 | -1.25 | -1.79 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 3.16 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 1.25 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.75 |
Michael McGreevy, St. Louis Cardinals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 98 | 7.7% | 62.0% | 91.2 mph | 25 | 19.5s | -23 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.10 | -1.35 | -0.74 | -1.39 | -0.99 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.20 | -0.68 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 0.99 | -0.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.73 |
Boston Red Sox @ Chicago White Sox, 4:40p
Summary
This is a quietly appealing pitching duel — a high-pNERD rookie lefty in Jake Bennett going for his third straight solid start against a dependable Davis Martin, and a White Sox lineup that looks likeliest to make things interesting. The gNERD of 13.97 sits comfortably above both the historical mean (10.11) and today's average (11.57), so this one ranks as better-than-typical viewing. Jake Bennett’s 7.67 pNERD reflects a young, 25-year-old lefty who debuted this season and has shown the swing-and-miss and control profile that scouts liked; he’s been effective in recent turns and was one of Boston’s offseason pitching additions. Davis Martin (pNERD 5.90) is more of a stabilization arm — the 9–3 record and sub-3.10 ERA this year argue for a pitcher who limits damage and forces contact. The White Sox’s elevated tNERD (8.19) is backed by positive batting runs and barrel rate, and their strong home form makes them the more likely source of fireworks. Boston’s tNERD comes from elite fielding and a deep bullpen but a struggling offense, so expect a game decided by timely hits against two pitchers who profile as solid rather than spectacle — watch for Bennett’s angles and whether Chicago’s batted-ball juice turns tidy starts into a messy, entertaining game.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Boston Red Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -30.0 | 7.0% | 3.3 | 21.9 | 28.1 | $263.6M | 29.2 | 14.0 | 2.47 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.97 | -0.87 | 0.70 | 1.47 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.97 | -0.87 | 0.70 | 1.47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 6.17 |
Chicago White Sox
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 18.6 | 8.9% | -2.6 | -2.1 | 23.9 | $105.8M | 27.1 | -7.0 | 1.82 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.65 | 0.88 | -0.67 | -0.12 | 0.39 | -1.11 | -1.76 | -0.43 | -1.11 | 0.39 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.65 | 0.88 | -0.67 | -0.12 | 0.39 | 1.11 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 4.00 | 8.19 |
Jake Bennett, Boston Red Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 87 | 12.2% | 67.4% | 92.8 mph | 25 | 18.2s | -16 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.73 | 0.76 | 1.45 | -0.65 | -0.99 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.46 | 0.38 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.67 |
Davis Martin, Chicago White Sox
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 88 | 11.7% | 64.3% | 93.7 mph | 29 | 18.0s | -15 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.67 | 0.53 | 0.18 | -0.23 | 0.06 | -0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.34 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.90 |
Atlanta Braves @ Pittsburgh Pirates, 3:40p
Summary
Fastball-centric fun: Jared Jones' high-octane stuff and Pittsburgh's lively offense make this a watchable contrast, even if Atlanta's veteran-ish, control-prone Grant Holmes keeps the game messy rather than masterful.
A gNERD of 13.05 sits well above today's mean and the historical 75th percentile, so this looks like one of the better-watch games on the slate. The matchup is fundamentally an outcomes-versus-velocity duel: Jones (pNERD 9.22) brings upper-90s juice, strong strike-swing disruption and an above-average xFIP profile, which explains his high pNERD and the eye-catching strikeout upside. Holmes (pNERD 3.02) profiles as a contact/command arm with below-average swing-and-miss and walk worries, so he’s more likely to yield traffic than punchouts—think baserunners and managerial bullpen chess. Team NERDs favor Pittsburgh (7.46) thanks to big batting and baserunning components, while Atlanta’s bullpen liability inflates drama rather than polish. Given the numbers and recent reports, tune in if you want hard heat, potential strikeout innings, and offensive noise; skip it if you only want pristine pitching duels.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Atlanta Braves (2.36); radio, Atlanta Braves (2.36)
Atlanta Braves
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -4.4 | 8.8% | 0.7 | 8.0 | 36.7 | $249.8M | 30.5 | -31.0 | 2.36 | 2.36 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.12 | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 1.09 | 0.54 | 1.36 | -1.92 | -0.05 | -0.06 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.12 | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.41 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 44.9 | 8.3% | 6.8 | -19.4 | 12.4 | $119.1M | 28.8 | 7.0 | 2.01 | 1.98 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.52 | 0.33 | 1.52 | -1.27 | -0.24 | -0.96 | -0.20 | 0.44 | -0.74 | -0.86 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.52 | 0.33 | 1.52 | -1.27 | -0.24 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 7.46 |
Grant Holmes, Atlanta Braves
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 109 | 12.0% | 62.7% | 94.0 mph | 30 | 18.6s | -19 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.45 | -0.09 | 0.32 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.05 | 0.33 | -0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.02 |
Jared Jones, Pittsburgh Pirates
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 91 | 13.6% | 61.2% | 98.6 mph | 24 | 19.0s | 31 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.50 | 1.42 | -1.07 | 2.04 | -1.25 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.00 | 0.71 | -0.54 | 2.00 | 1.25 | -0.01 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 9.22 |
Colorado Rockies @ Los Angeles Dodgers, 7:10p
Summary
A clear pick for viewers who like star-quality stuff and storylines over a tight contest: Roki Sasaki’s high-velocity arsenal and the Dodgers’ powerful lineup promise bite, while Colorado is sending 24-year-old Gabriel Hughes for his MLB debut — so expect fireworks more than a chess match. The gNERD of 12.80 sits above today’s average and reflects a lop-sided but watchable clash: Los Angeles’s enormous tNERD (10.65) is driven by elite offense, quality fielding, and a bullpen that can turn any game into a sequence of dramatic matchups, while Colorado’s tiny tNERD (2.45) signals few counterbalances. Sasaki’s strong pNERD (7.49) lines up with plus velocity and strikeout upside, even as his surface numbers have been uneven this season — there’s real variance to enjoy and a decent case he can settle in better than his ERA suggests. Gabriel Hughes’s pNERD of 0 means we’re largely watching narrative and raw stuff — rookie adrenaline, first-start volatility, and how the Dodgers attack a debutant. In short: not a classic pitcher’s duel, but a high-watchability mismatch with plenty of action and a debut subplot worth tuning into.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Colorado Rockies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -26.4 | 6.8% | -2.6 | -11.1 | 24.1 | $134.1M | 29.5 | 9.0 | 1.73 | 1.80 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.85 | -1.06 | -0.67 | -0.72 | 0.40 | -0.79 | 0.44 | 0.56 | -1.29 | -1.25 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.85 | -1.06 | -0.67 | -0.72 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.45 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 72.1 | 9.5% | -3.0 | 20.4 | 39.5 | $413.5M | 30.0 | 12.0 | 2.45 | 2.51 | — | — |
| Z-score | 2.43 | 1.44 | -0.76 | 1.37 | 1.25 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.12 | 0.26 | — | — |
| tNERD | 2.43 | 1.44 | -0.76 | 1.37 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 4.00 | 10.65 |
Gabriel Hughes, Colorado Rockies
No detailed stats available
Roki Sasaki, Los Angeles Dodgers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 12.6% | 63.7% | 97.5 mph | 24 | 19.4s | 25 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.18 | 0.95 | -0.06 | 1.53 | -1.25 | 0.35 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.37 | 0.48 | -0.03 | 1.53 | 1.25 | -0.17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.49 |
Seattle Mariners @ Miami Marlins, 3:40p
Summary
George Kirby’s command and velo make this a must-see if you like pitchers who can erase traffic, while Miami’s base-stealing, high-run-expectancy offense gives the game the kind of contrast that actually produces action.
The gNERD of 12.66 sits comfortably above today’s game average (11.57) and signals a better-than-normal chance of an entertaining outing: Kirby’s strong pNERD (7.95) reflects swing-and-miss control, above-average velocity, and strike-rate that compresses innings, which should suppress what’s otherwise a lively Marlins lineup. Miami’s sky-high tNERD (9.67) is driven by elite baserunning and a team that leads the league in stolen-base/BR runs, so expect bunt-and-steal/extra-base attempts to force action and defensive plays. Tyler Phillips (pNERD 3.91) profiles as the weaker starter — his 110 xFIP- and lower pNERD make him more vulnerable to a team that attacks the basepaths and takes extra bases. Add that Seattle’s bullpen has been stretched by recent injuries, which raises the likelihood of late-inning swings, and you’ve got a game that’s watchable because the matchup is clear: strong starter vs. speed-first offense with bullpen risk.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Seattle Mariners (2.35); radio, Seattle Mariners (2.52)
Seattle Mariners
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 6.5 | 8.0% | -3.0 | -20.9 | 24.0 | $196.7M | 28.4 | 8.0 | 2.35 | 2.52 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.25 | 0.05 | -0.76 | -1.37 | 0.40 | -0.07 | -0.52 | 0.50 | -0.07 | 0.28 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.25 | 0.05 | -0.76 | -1.37 | 0.40 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 4.00 | 3.80 |
Miami Marlins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 14.2 | 6.6% | 6.6 | 3.1 | 30.0 | $81.5M | 27.4 | 18.0 | 1.79 | 1.66 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.50 | -1.24 | 1.47 | 0.22 | 0.73 | -1.39 | -1.49 | 1.12 | -1.17 | -1.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.50 | -1.24 | 1.47 | 0.22 | 0.73 | 1.39 | 1.49 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9.67 |
George Kirby, Seattle Mariners
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 87 | 10.8% | 67.5% | 96.8 mph | 28 | 19.0s | 10 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.73 | 0.10 | 1.49 | 1.20 | -0.21 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.46 | 0.05 | 0.75 | 1.20 | 0.21 | -0.01 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 7.95 |
Tyler Phillips, Miami Marlins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 110 | 10.9% | 63.4% | 96.0 mph | 28 | 18.4s | -28 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.58 | 0.15 | -0.16 | 0.83 | -0.21 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.16 | 0.08 | -0.08 | 0.83 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.91 |
Philadelphia Phillies @ Cincinnati Reds, 4:10p
Summary
Watch if you care about pitching fireworks: Chase Burns turns this into a live-or-die viewing proposition, while the Phillies’ TBD starter (a bullpen game) makes the matchup unpredictable. Burns’ sky-high pNERD (10.67) reflects a real-season story — triple-digit heater, elite swing-and-miss and Cy-Young buzz — so you’re buying strikeouts and high-leverage drama every time he’s on the mound.
The gNERD of 12.57 sits above today’s mean and historic medians, largely driven by Burns’ profile and the Phillies’ decent tNERD (6.13) vs a weaker Reds team metric (3.34); that split suggests a game where elite starting pitching meets offensive uncertainty. The Phillies’ lineup metrics here are mixed (poor batting runs but plus baserunning and a taxed bullpen), while the Reds’ offense shows some barrel talent but a shaky relief corps — recipe for tight innings and a bullpen-stretch finish. The Phillies listing “TBD” for a starter implies a bullpen plan, which lifts watchability because it creates matchup chess against Burns’ dominant stuff.
If you want strikeouts, sequencing and managerial maneuvering, this is a solid pick; if you prefer even contests between two deep rotations, lower your expectations.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Philadelphia Phillies
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -32.6 | 7.9% | 7.0 | -7.0 | 39.9 | $309.8M | 30.5 | -16.0 | 2.92 | 2.69 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.05 | -0.04 | 1.56 | -0.45 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.99 | 1.03 | 0.64 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.05 | -0.04 | 1.56 | -0.45 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 4.00 | 6.13 |
Cincinnati Reds
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -53.4 | 9.2% | -0.1 | -7.3 | -10.1 | $147.4M | 28.0 | 6.0 | 2.09 | 2.11 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.74 | 1.16 | -0.09 | -0.47 | -1.46 | -0.63 | -0.94 | 0.37 | -0.59 | -0.59 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.74 | 1.16 | -0.09 | -0.47 | -1.46 | 0.63 | 0.94 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.34 |
Chase Burns, Cincinnati Reds
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 79 | 14.8% | 63.3% | 97.9 mph | 23 | 18.0s | -25 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.18 | 1.98 | -0.23 | 1.71 | -1.52 | -0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 2.37 | 0.99 | -0.12 | 1.71 | 1.52 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.67 |
New York Yankees @ Tampa Bay Rays, 3:40p
Summary
Two very good pitchers — McClanahan’s swing-and-miss stuff vs. Cole’s power and strike-rate — make this a watchable duel, and the gNERD (12.34) backs that up: it’s above today’s average and nudges past the historical 75th percentile, so this isn’t one to skip. New York’s lineup (tNERD 9.29) still provides big-play upside — the barrel and baserunning marks pull a lot of weight — but the Yankees’ recent contact problems (17 strikeouts in the prior game) mean McClanahan’s whiffs could turn a tight game into a one-sided afternoon. McClanahan’s edge in the pNERD (6.60) comes from a strong xFIP- and brisk pace that fuels strikeouts; Cole (pNERD 5.49) brings higher velocity and a great strike% but lower swinging-strike, so he’s more liable to get into contact-heavy jams as he rebuilds form post‑Tommy John. Tampa Bay’s team score is low, but positive “luck” suggests they’ve been underperforming and could bite back at home — add a packed Trop atmosphere and AL East stakes and you’ve got a game that’s entertaining even if it doesn’t promise instant fireworks.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Tampa Bay Rays (2.27); radio, New York Yankees (2.22)
New York Yankees
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 22.7 | 9.9% | 6.5 | 5.1 | 33.1 | $337.1M | 29.9 | -16.0 | 2.08 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.79 | 1.81 | 1.45 | 0.35 | 0.90 | 1.54 | 0.85 | -0.99 | -0.61 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.79 | 1.81 | 1.45 | 0.35 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 9.29 |
Tampa Bay Rays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 17.7 | 5.4% | 1.6 | -12.8 | 8.1 | $106.9M | 29.1 | 15.0 | 2.27 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.62 | -2.35 | 0.31 | -0.83 | -0.47 | -1.10 | 0.07 | 0.93 | -0.23 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.62 | -2.35 | 0.31 | -0.83 | -0.47 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.30 |
Gerrit Cole, New York Yankees
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 99 | 7.7% | 69.0% | 96.7 mph | 35 | 18.8s | -2 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.04 | -1.35 | 2.08 | 1.16 | 1.63 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.09 | -0.68 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.49 |
Shane McClanahan, Tampa Bay Rays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 93 | 11.8% | 65.4% | 95.6 mph | 29 | 17.1s | -21 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.39 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.06 | -1.54 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.77 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.60 |
Kansas City Royals @ New York Mets, 4:10p
Summary
If you like high-octane volatility, this one is worth a glance: Steven Cruz’s pitch-missing, 98+ mph juice and a gNERD tilted toward the arms promise strikeouts and short starts, while Christian Scott’s recent IL comeback has been homer-prone enough to hand this game to the bullpens.
The model’s gNERD (11.60) leans toward watchable mainly because pNERD (7.38) is doing the heavy lifting: Cruz’s elite velocity and swing‑and‑miss profile drive his 9.68 pNERD and make him a likely short, intense outing that forces matchup chess; Scott’s middling 5.09 and recent homers/limited length after IL time mean he’s more of a “don’t expect six shutout innings” starter.
Team flavors pull the other way—the Royals’ tNERD is low (their bullpen has been a glaring weakness), while the Mets’ bullpen and broadcast draw add some spectator value—so expect offense-heavy innings and plenty of relief arms. The previous meeting exploded for lots of runs, which is the clearest preview of what this duel could look like.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
Kansas City Royals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -10.7 | 8.4% | 1.7 | 8.2 | -22.8 | $184.5M | 29.7 | 11.0 | 2.11 | 2.22 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.33 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.56 | -2.16 | -0.21 | 0.62 | 0.68 | -0.54 | -0.36 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.33 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.56 | -2.16 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.72 |
New York Mets
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -36.0 | 8.8% | -3.5 | -6.7 | 31.1 | $374.9M | 29.9 | -13.0 | 3.32 | 3.05 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.17 | 0.79 | -0.88 | -0.43 | 0.79 | 1.97 | 0.85 | -0.80 | 1.82 | 1.41 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.17 | 0.79 | -0.88 | -0.43 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 4.00 | 4.72 |
Steven Cruz, Kansas City Royals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 88 | 15.0% | 63.5% | 98.2 mph | 27 | 18.4s | 30 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.67 | 2.08 | -0.12 | 1.85 | -0.47 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.34 | 1.04 | -0.06 | 1.85 | 0.47 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 9.68 |
Christian Scott, New York Mets
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 97 | 11.6% | 63.3% | 95.3 mph | 27 | 19.3s | -12 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.16 | 0.48 | -0.22 | 0.51 | -0.47 | 0.26 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.32 | 0.24 | -0.11 | 0.51 | 0.47 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.09 |
Toronto Blue Jays @ San Francisco Giants, 12:45p
Summary
This is a pitchers' game worth tuning into mostly for Dylan Cease — his swing‑and‑miss stuff and elite underlying metrics make him the marquee attraction — while the teams' offenses offer little assurance of a fireworks show. Cease's pNERD (10.45) captures that: a low xFIP‑ and heavy strikeout profile combined with high velocity has translated to consistently dominant starts this season, making him the primary reason to watch.
Logan Webb (pNERD 5.93) is the steady foil — a veteran who keeps hitters honest and has been especially effective in day games, but he doesn't bring the same swing‑and‑miss upside, so the matchup favors Cease-driven strikeouts and low scoring.
Team NERDs (Blue Jays 2.07, Giants 4.10) underline why the contest may feel subdued: Toronto's offense has weak barrel and run creation marks, while San Francisco's lineup and bullpen figures are mediocre, though the Giants' large positive luck number suggests their results could improve. The result is a middling gNERD (11.27): not a can’t‑miss slugfest, but a compelling watch if you want elite pitching and strikeouts over offensive chaos.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
Toronto Blue Jays
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -32.9 | 6.2% | -5.3 | 11.8 | 26.6 | $306.1M | 30.1 | 0.0 | 3.10 | 2.39 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.06 | -1.61 | -1.30 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 0.01 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.06 | -1.61 | -1.30 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.07 |
San Francisco Giants
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 3.9 | 7.3% | -7.7 | -5.9 | -3.8 | $228.3M | 29.6 | 31.0 | 3.20 | 3.49 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.16 | -0.60 | -1.86 | -0.37 | -1.12 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 1.92 | 1.59 | 2.34 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.16 | -0.60 | -1.86 | -0.37 | -1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 4.00 | 4.10 |
Dylan Cease, Toronto Blue Jays
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 62 | 15.2% | 62.0% | 97.4 mph | 30 | 19.2s | 5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -2.15 | 2.17 | -0.76 | 1.48 | 0.32 | 0.18 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 4.30 | 1.09 | -0.38 | 1.48 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 10.45 |
Logan Webb, San Francisco Giants
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 84 | 8.8% | 65.4% | 92.3 mph | 29 | 18.4s | 4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.90 | -0.84 | 0.64 | -0.88 | 0.06 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.80 | -0.42 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.93 |
Arizona Diamondbacks @ San Diego Padres, 7:10p
Summary
Watch if you like pitcher-driven chess more than fireworks: a rookie arm with virtually no major-league track record faces a competent, strikeout-capable veteran, and the game’s watchability lives or dies on whether the Padres’ bullpen — a clear team strength — gets involved. The gNERD of 10.55 is essentially middling (near the historical mean of ~10.1 and a touch below today’s game average), so expect a low-variance contest rather than a slugfest. The Padres’ high tNERD (8.68) comes from better baserunning, fielding and a big bullpen edge — San Diego’s relief corps has been a reliable component of the roster this year. Arizona’s lineup is one of the weaker offensive engines here while their defense helps offset some of that (tNERD 4.21). Jose Cabrera is essentially a fresh face in the big leagues with very limited data after a recent call-up, so his pNERD shows as 0 and brings uncertainty rather than excitement. Michael King is the safer box-office bet — capable of punching out batters and eating innings — but his pNERD (3.20) signals modest upside rather than ace-level dominance. Overall: prioritize other games for fireworks, tune into this one if you prefer clean execution, bullpen strategy and the “is the rookie ready?” subplot.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
Arizona Diamondbacks
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -45.4 | 6.9% | 3.5 | 25.1 | 20.9 | $231.6M | 30.2 | -18.0 | 2.19 | 1.92 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.48 | -0.97 | 0.75 | 1.68 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 1.08 | -1.11 | -0.39 | -0.99 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.48 | -0.97 | 0.75 | 1.68 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.21 |
San Diego Padres
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -47.4 | 8.3% | 5.6 | 16.1 | 43.8 | $255.5M | 29.9 | -9.0 | 3.47 | 3.37 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.55 | 0.33 | 1.24 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.56 | 2.12 | 2.09 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.55 | 0.33 | 1.24 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 4.00 | 8.68 |
Jose Cabrera, Arizona Diamondbacks
No detailed stats available
Michael King, San Diego Padres
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 10.3% | 62.6% | 93.4 mph | 31 | 18.5s | -18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.24 | -0.13 | -0.51 | -0.37 | 0.58 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.48 | -0.07 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.20 |
Houston Astros @ Washington Nationals, 3:45p
Summary
Not a marquee pitchers’ duel, but one worth tuning into if you like good offense and late-inning volatility: Washington’s lineup, speed and batted‑ball profile clash with an Astros staff that looks light on tNERD, and Foster Griffin’s strong run of form gives Washington the best chance to keep it close. The gNERD (10.14) sits almost exactly at the historical median, but the story lives in the splits — Nationals tNERD 8.29 vs. Astros 3.71 and a clear pitching tilt: Griffin’s above‑average pNERD (6.06) and quality surface metrics (strong season numbers) contrast with Spencer Arrighetti’s low pNERD (2.22) and a surface profile that trades strike‑stuff for a plodding pace; Arrighetti did flash a big‑whiff curve in a recent start, but Griffin has been the steadier arm this year. Washington’s offense (high batting runs, barrels and baserunning) plus Houston’s bullpen fragility make this more watchable than the modest gNERD alone implies — expect contact, baserunning chaos, and a game that tilts toward late leverage rather than dominant starting‑pitching theater.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, Washington Nationals (2.20)
Houston Astros
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 12.2 | 8.6% | -2.8 | -4.9 | 8.3 | $232.7M | 28.9 | -3.0 | 2.17 | 1.99 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.72 | -0.31 | -0.46 | 0.34 | -0.16 | -0.18 | -0.42 | -0.84 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.72 | -0.31 | -0.46 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.71 |
Washington Nationals
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 33.4 | 8.9% | 6.6 | 1.1 | -20.3 | $114.5M | 27.1 | -32.0 | 2.00 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.47 | 0.09 | -2.02 | -1.01 | -1.71 | -1.98 | -0.75 | -0.40 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.47 | 0.09 | -2.02 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 8.29 |
Spencer Arrighetti, Houston Astros
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 109 | 10.4% | 60.7% | 92.4 mph | 26 | 20.4s | -18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.52 | -0.08 | -1.27 | -0.83 | -0.73 | 1.17 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.05 | -0.04 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 0.73 | -0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.22 |
Foster Griffin, Washington Nationals
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 86 | 10.7% | 66.5% | 91.4 mph | 30 | 18.7s | -18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.78 | 0.06 | 1.09 | -1.30 | 0.32 | -0.23 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 1.57 | 0.03 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.06 |
Cleveland Guardians @ Minnesota Twins, 4:40p
Summary
Middling headline: this is not a marquee duel — gNERD 9.84 flags a below-average watch — but there’s a live-arm subplot in Connor Prielipp and enough team contrast to make innings 1–4 interesting.
The numbers explain the feel: Prielipp’s higher pNERD (6.47) versus Slade Cecconi’s quieter 3.37 predicts a matchup tilted toward the younger, higher-velocity southpaw who’s shown swing-and-miss juice and, by his positive “luck” component, looks due for some deserved results. Cecconi’s strikeout and contact profiles are less imposing, though he’s posted a few solid outings lately for Cleveland.
Team-wise, Cleveland’s tNERD leans on above-average defense and a steady bullpen while their offense metrics are suppressed; Minnesota brings more barrel/pop but shaky defense and baserunning, which helps explain the Twins’ lower overall tNERD and the game’s moderate watchability. The clubs are tightly packed in the standings, so the game has some consequence beyond pure spectacle.
Bottom line: pick this one if you favor pitcher-batter contrasts and a potentially bounce-back start from Prielipp; skip it if you want a clear, top-tier pitching duel.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Minnesota Twins (2.30); radio, Cleveland Guardians (3.14)
Cleveland Guardians
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -33.8 | 6.1% | 3.1 | 9.5 | 27.6 | $88.9M | 27.6 | 2.0 | 2.16 | 3.14 | — | — |
| Z-score | -1.09 | -1.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.60 | -1.30 | -1.35 | 0.13 | -0.44 | 1.60 | — | — |
| tNERD | -1.09 | -1.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 4.00 | 6.67 |
Minnesota Twins
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 23.7 | 8.7% | -5.0 | -16.7 | -1.8 | $122.1M | 28.9 | -12.0 | 2.30 | 2.06 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.82 | 0.70 | -1.23 | -1.09 | -1.01 | -0.92 | -0.06 | -0.74 | -0.17 | -0.69 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.82 | 0.70 | -1.23 | -1.09 | -1.01 | 0.92 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.17 |
Slade Cecconi, Cleveland Guardians
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 103 | 8.4% | 63.4% | 93.3 mph | 27 | 19.3s | 4 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.18 | -1.02 | -0.18 | -0.42 | -0.47 | 0.26 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.37 | -0.51 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 0.47 | -0.13 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.37 |
Connor Prielipp, Minnesota Twins
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 99 | 9.3% | 64.2% | 95.3 mph | 25 | 18.0s | 18 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.04 | -0.60 | 0.16 | 0.51 | -0.99 | -0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.09 | -0.30 | 0.08 | 0.51 | 0.99 | 0.40 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.47 |
Chicago Cubs @ Baltimore Orioles, 3:35p
Summary
Low-ceiling pitching and a middling gNERD (9.82) make this more of a background game than a must-watch — but the contrast between a quietly strong Cubs roster profile and an Orioles staff full of bullpen and roster intrigue gives it a few watchable angles. The numbers say the Cubs bring the more interesting team package: a high tNERD (8.41) driven by excellent defensive runs and solid batting runs plus strong broadcast appeal, while Baltimore’s lower tNERD (4.10) masks a productive bullpen whose runs allowed could create late-inning drama. Colin Rea’s pNERD (2.13) reflects clear red flags — elevated xFIP- and virtually no whiff rate — so don’t expect overpowering stuff, and Dean Kremer’s pNERD is 0 because his detailed metrics aren’t in the dataset; he’s been in-and-out of the roster recently and looks like a reclamation/rotation depth story rather than a dominant arm. Given the below-average gNERD (it sits under today’s mean of 11.57 and the historical median), watch this if you enjoy low-variance offense, bullpen leverage spots, or roster/rotation narratives; otherwise, pick a higher gNERD game.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
Chicago Cubs
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 38.9 | 7.5% | 2.1 | 36.7 | -5.8 | $246.2M | 29.8 | 7.0 | 3.01 | 3.15 | — | — |
| Z-score | 1.32 | -0.41 | 0.42 | 2.45 | -1.23 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.44 | 1.22 | 1.62 | — | — |
| tNERD | 1.32 | -0.41 | 0.42 | 2.45 | -1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 4.00 | 8.41 |
Baltimore Orioles
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 3.8 | 8.2% | -2.0 | -10.1 | 24.9 | $214.8M | 29.0 | -11.0 | 2.82 | 2.10 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.53 | -0.65 | 0.45 | 0.14 | -0.02 | -0.68 | 0.85 | -0.61 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.53 | -0.65 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.10 |
Colin Rea, Chicago Cubs
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 113 | 8.7% | 63.8% | 93.6 mph | 35 | 18.4s | 1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.75 | -0.88 | -0.03 | -0.28 | 1.63 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.50 | -0.44 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.13 |
Dean Kremer, Baltimore Orioles
No detailed stats available
Los Angeles Angels @ Texas Rangers, 5:05p
Summary
Not must-see, but starter-watchers will find something to like: two pitchers with different flavors — a high-octane rookie and a steadier lefty — make this worth tuning into for the first five innings, even if the teams on paper promise little fireworks. The gNERD (9.45) sits below today’s average, driven mostly by very low Angels tNERD and modest overall team profiles.
Walbert Ureña is the real novelty: a 22-year-old with upper-90s velocity who has twice flirted with dominant outings this season (including a stretch of near no-hitter stuff), which explains his above-average pNERD and the “boom-or-bust” feel of his starts. MacKenzie Gore is less volatile and has settled into a run of quality starts for the Rangers, carrying a mid-4.00 ERA but solid K:BB and groundball work that make him a reliable foil. The Rangers’ positive luck figure (very high in the supporting data) suggests this lineup could improve, but the Angels’ poor defensive and baserunning components cap ceiling for a back-and-forth slugfest. In short: watch for the pitching duel early, don’t expect a consistently entertaining offensive affair.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Texas Rangers (2.08)
Los Angeles Angels
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -16.5 | 8.8% | -6.4 | -23.5 | 0.3 | $191.6M | 28.6 | -5.0 | 2.59 | 2.01 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.52 | 0.79 | -1.56 | -1.54 | -0.90 | -0.13 | -0.39 | -0.31 | 0.40 | -0.80 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.52 | 0.79 | -1.56 | -1.54 | -0.90 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 0.99 |
Texas Rangers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 7.3 | 7.7% | -1.8 | -1.8 | 26.2 | $201.9M | 30.3 | 29.0 | 2.01 | 2.08 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.27 | -0.23 | -0.49 | -0.10 | 0.52 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 1.80 | -0.74 | -0.65 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.27 | -0.23 | -0.49 | -0.10 | 0.52 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5.79 |
Walbert Ureña, Los Angeles Angels
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 104 | 11.8% | 60.8% | 97.5 mph | 22 | 19.0s | -33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.24 | 0.57 | -1.23 | 1.53 | -1.78 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.48 | 0.29 | -0.62 | 1.53 | 1.78 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.29 |
MacKenzie Gore, Texas Rangers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 94 | 11.3% | 63.6% | 95.5 mph | 27 | 19.7s | 10 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.33 | 0.34 | -0.11 | 0.60 | -0.47 | 0.59 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | 0.66 | 0.17 | -0.06 | 0.60 | 0.47 | -0.30 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 5.84 |
Athletics @ Detroit Tigers, 3:40p
Summary
Not a can’t-miss: gNERD 8.94 puts this at the bottom of today’s slate, and it looks like a pitcher’s duel that’s more likely to be quietly efficient than wildly entertaining. Troy Melton is the real reason to tune in — he’s the younger, higher-pNERD arm (better velo, frantic pace) who’s been stingy in starts this year and has routinely limited damage. Jeffrey Springs is the opposite profile: veteran, volatile, lower pNERD and a pitcher who’s shown susceptibility to long balls and batted‑ball damage — though his big positive luck number here suggests some of his poor results may be unsustainable. Team NERDs are middling and both clubs’ luck z‑scores are high, implying both offenses could be underperforming their underlying profiles and might wake up. The A’s poor team defense and the Tigers’ higher barreling tendency are small sparks for offense, but overall the analytical picture (low gNERD, low-ish tNERDs, one steady young starter vs. a boom‑or‑bust vet) makes this a lower-priority game unless you like watching Melton mow through lineups or catching a Springs meltdown.
(A model from OpenAI generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Athletics
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 10.3 | 8.2% | -3.7 | -22.3 | 6.1 | $135.2M | 28.2 | 16.0 | 1.27 | 1.94 | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.37 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -1.46 | -0.58 | -0.77 | -0.71 | 0.99 | -2.19 | -0.95 | — | — |
| tNERD | 0.37 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -1.46 | -0.58 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.11 |
Detroit Tigers
| Batting | Barrel% | BaseR | Fielding | Bullpen | Payroll | Age | Luck | TV | Radio | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | -4.2 | 8.9% | -1.4 | -11.0 | 8.0 | $239.2M | 29.6 | 16.0 | 2.74 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Z-score | -0.11 | 0.88 | -0.39 | -0.71 | -0.48 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.99 | 0.69 | 0.54 | — | — |
| tNERD | -0.11 | 0.88 | -0.39 | -0.71 | -0.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 4.00 | 4.80 |
Jeffrey Springs, Athletics
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 113 | 10.0% | 63.7% | 91.5 mph | 33 | 19.5s | 21 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.75 | -0.27 | -0.04 | -1.25 | 1.11 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -1.50 | -0.14 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.92 |
Troy Melton, Detroit Tigers
| xFIP- | SwStr% | Strike% | Velocity | Age | Pace | Luck | KN% | C | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw stat | 102 | 10.2% | 63.4% | 95.9 mph | 25 | 16.8s | -53 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Z-score | 0.13 | -0.18 | -0.19 | 0.79 | -0.99 | -1.79 | — | — | — | — |
| pNERD | -0.25 | -0.09 | -0.10 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.04 |
- ← Previous
MLB: What to watch on July 7, 2026