MLB: What to watch on August 15, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Milwaukee Brewers @ Los Angeles Dodgers, 4:15p
Summary
A dominant ace facing a stacked lineup in a playoff-race showdown—this one's near the top of the watchability charts today, and for good reason. Jacob Misiorowski brings a pNERD of 16.03, comfortably the best mark of any starter today, and the underlying numbers back up the hype: he's MLB's leader in ERA (1.76), strikeouts (204), WHIP (0.74) and opponents' average (.147), riding a fastball that averages 100.6 mph into a Cy Young conversation. His last trip to Dodger Stadium came in relief last October, where he delivered five quality innings in relief with nine strikeouts in Game 3 of last year's NL Championship Series, an outing he now calls the turning point of his season. Across the mound, Justin Wrobleski (pNERD 6.24) is trying to shake off a brutal stretch, having allowed nine home runs, leading to 16 runs allowed (15 earned) in 13 2/3 innings over his last three starts. Both tNERD scores sit near 9, well above the historical 95th percentile, with the Dodgers' scorching offense and the Brewers' elite bullpen and baserunning giving this game top-shelf team quality on both sides. With Ohtani stepping in against Misiorowski's heater and a first-place showdown on the line, this is appointment viewing.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Milwaukee Brewers (2.66); radio, Milwaukee Brewers (2.56)
Milwaukee Brewers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
17.2 |
7.5% |
7.8 |
-2.5 |
53.7 |
$139.3M |
27.7 |
-13.0 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.54 |
-0.28 |
1.45 |
-0.10 |
1.37 |
-0.73 |
-1.21 |
-0.79 |
0.53 |
0.37 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.54 |
-0.28 |
1.45 |
-0.10 |
1.37 |
0.73 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
0.27 |
0.18 |
4.00 |
9.36 |
Los Angeles Dodgers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
62.5 |
8.9% |
-4.4 |
18.6 |
39.5 |
$413.5M |
30.0 |
11.0 |
2.45 |
2.51 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.88 |
1.16 |
-0.90 |
1.03 |
0.76 |
2.41 |
0.90 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.26 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.88 |
1.16 |
-0.90 |
1.03 |
0.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.68 |
0.06 |
0.13 |
4.00 |
8.80 |
Jacob Misiorowski, Milwaukee Brewers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
47 |
18.2% |
68.8% |
100.7 mph |
24 |
19.7s |
-4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-3.18 |
3.62 |
2.16 |
2.91 |
-1.24 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
6.37 |
1.81 |
1.08 |
2.00 |
1.24 |
-0.27 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
16.03 |
Justin Wrobleski, Los Angeles Dodgers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
8.7% |
67.5% |
94.3 mph |
25 |
16.6s |
-17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.04 |
-0.87 |
1.57 |
0.04 |
-0.97 |
-2.00 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.08 |
-0.43 |
0.78 |
0.04 |
0.97 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.24 |
Go back to top of page
San Diego Padres @ Cleveland Guardians, 4:10p
Summary
San Diego riding a six-game winning streak into a game with real wild-card stakes, while Cleveland limps in having dropped four straight at home — this one leans watchable mostly because of the Padres, not despite them. San Diego's 10.23 tNERD is among the best you'll see today, built on a shutdown bullpen, sturdy baserunning, and above-average defense, even though the lineup itself hasn't been hitting for much thump lately. Cleveland's 7.80 mark is buoyed less by star power than by scrappy fundamentals — solid baserunning, a young, cheap roster, and some positive regression looming given their negative luck figure — but a genuinely poor barrel rate keeps the offense capped, and reports have José Ramírez out of Friday's lineup. Joey Cantillo takes the mound with a respectable 5.54 pNERD, his above-average whiff rate and xFIP- in the mid-90s making him a legitimately interesting look, even if his control has wobbled. The opposing starter is unlisted in our data, but reporting suggests it's Randy Vásquez, who won't move the needle much. Overall, a 14.29 gNERD lands comfortably above the historical midpoint — worth a look, particularly for the Padres' side of the ledger.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Diego Padres (3.47); radio, San Diego Padres (3.37)
San Diego Padres
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-9.5 |
8.3% |
5.6 |
16.8 |
65.6 |
$255.5M |
29.9 |
-8.0 |
3.47 |
3.37 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.25 |
0.54 |
1.02 |
0.93 |
1.88 |
0.60 |
0.85 |
-0.49 |
2.12 |
2.09 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.25 |
0.54 |
1.02 |
0.93 |
1.88 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.06 |
1.04 |
4.00 |
10.23 |
Cleveland Guardians
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-30.8 |
6.3% |
5.1 |
9.1 |
33.0 |
$88.9M |
27.6 |
13.0 |
2.16 |
3.14 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.88 |
-1.51 |
0.93 |
0.52 |
0.49 |
-1.30 |
-1.35 |
0.80 |
-0.44 |
1.60 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.88 |
-1.51 |
0.93 |
0.52 |
0.49 |
1.30 |
1.35 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
4.00 |
7.80 |
Joey Cantillo, Cleveland Guardians
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
95 |
13.2% |
62.6% |
92.2 mph |
26 |
19.1s |
0 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.34 |
1.26 |
-0.49 |
-0.90 |
-0.71 |
0.05 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.67 |
0.63 |
-0.24 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.54 |
Go back to top of page
Washington Nationals @ New York Mets, 1:10p
Summary
Both the Nationals and Mets are also-rans this year, but this game still has more juice than the standings suggest, thanks to a lineup that leads the league in power and a Mets team quietly riding a bit of a patchwork pitching renaissance. Washington's offense is the story here — the Nationals have hit 177 total home runs to lead the NL, and that pop plus solid baserunning drives their tNERD to a strong 9.26, comfortably above both the historic and today's-game averages. New York's tNERD is more middling at 5.37, dragged down by underwhelming batting and baserunning marks, though a well-regarded broadcast crew nudges the number up a bit. On the mound, Brad Lord has quietly been effective — he's 5-2 with a 3.79 ERA in 61.2 innings — and his low walk rate and strong xFIP- give him the higher pNERD of the two starters. Sean Manaea, meanwhile, has been rounding back into form since returning to the rotation, going 3-4 with a 3.50 ERA in 11 starts since moving back into the rotation June 13. With a gNERD of 13.36, this one sits above both the historic and today's averages — a solid, if unspectacular, way to spend an afternoon.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
Washington Nationals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
60.4 |
9.1% |
10.5 |
-6.3 |
-32.4 |
$114.5M |
27.1 |
-26.0 |
2.00 |
2.20 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.82 |
1.36 |
1.97 |
-0.31 |
-2.30 |
-1.01 |
-1.71 |
-1.59 |
-0.75 |
-0.40 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.82 |
1.36 |
1.97 |
-0.31 |
-2.30 |
1.01 |
1.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
9.26 |
New York Mets
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-28.3 |
8.7% |
-3.7 |
-3.9 |
34.6 |
$374.9M |
29.9 |
-4.0 |
3.32 |
3.05 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.80 |
0.95 |
-0.77 |
-0.18 |
0.55 |
1.97 |
0.85 |
-0.24 |
1.82 |
1.41 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.80 |
0.95 |
-0.77 |
-0.18 |
0.55 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.70 |
4.00 |
5.37 |
Brad Lord, Washington Nationals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
88 |
9.0% |
67.5% |
94.5 mph |
26 |
19.6s |
3 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.75 |
-0.72 |
1.57 |
0.13 |
-0.71 |
0.45 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.50 |
-0.36 |
0.78 |
0.13 |
0.71 |
-0.23 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.48 |
Sean Manaea, New York Mets
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
98 |
10.5% |
66.1% |
90.8 mph |
34 |
17.1s |
4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.16 |
-0.02 |
1.01 |
-1.53 |
1.44 |
-1.59 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.32 |
-0.01 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.79 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.61 |
Go back to top of page
Boston Red Sox @ Pittsburgh Pirates, 4:15p
Summary
A high-octane arm versus a rock-solid veteran makes this one worth flipping on, even if the surrounding storylines are more "attrition report" than drama. Sonny Gray has been quietly excellent for Boston, sporting a 2.79 ERA heading into this one, and his xFIP- backs it up as genuinely above-average, though his pedestrian velocity and glacial pace shave some shine off his pNERD. The real draw is Pittsburgh's Jared Jones, who touches 98.3 mph and profiles as a legitimate swing-and-miss arm — his pNERD near 9.8 is one of the higher marks you'll see — even though his surface results have been ugly lately, including giving up eight earned runs and allowing six hits in three innings against the New York Mets last time out. That gap between stuff and results, plus a solid positive luck number, suggests better days are ahead for him regardless of the box score. Pittsburgh's lineup is banged up, with Nick Gonzales, listed as day-to-day with a head issue, hitting .307, and Oneil Cruz still working back from a hand injury. Both teams grade above-average on tNERD, and the gNERD here sits comfortably above the historical and today's medians — a genuinely watchable pitching matchup wrapped around some shaky roster health.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Boston Red Sox (2.47); radio, Boston Red Sox (2.64)
Boston Red Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-8.8 |
7.2% |
0.4 |
10.7 |
55.6 |
$263.6M |
29.2 |
7.0 |
2.47 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.23 |
-0.58 |
0.02 |
0.61 |
1.45 |
0.70 |
0.17 |
0.43 |
0.16 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.23 |
-0.58 |
0.02 |
0.61 |
1.45 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.43 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
6.05 |
Pittsburgh Pirates
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
30.6 |
8.0% |
6.4 |
-21.3 |
26.3 |
$119.1M |
28.8 |
-2.0 |
2.01 |
1.98 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.94 |
0.24 |
1.18 |
-1.11 |
0.20 |
-0.96 |
-0.20 |
-0.12 |
-0.74 |
-0.86 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.94 |
0.24 |
1.18 |
-1.11 |
0.20 |
0.96 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.60 |
Sonny Gray, Boston Red Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
89 |
9.7% |
64.5% |
91.9 mph |
36 |
21.4s |
-25 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.69 |
-0.39 |
0.28 |
-1.04 |
1.97 |
1.93 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.38 |
-0.20 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
-0.96 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.17 |
Jared Jones, Pittsburgh Pirates
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
91 |
13.1% |
63.3% |
98.3 mph |
24 |
18.4s |
28 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.57 |
1.21 |
-0.19 |
1.83 |
-1.24 |
-0.53 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.15 |
0.61 |
-0.10 |
1.83 |
1.24 |
0.26 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
9.80 |
Go back to top of page
Philadelphia Phillies @ Minnesota Twins, 4:10p
Summary
Luzardo dealing against a shaky Twins roster makes this one worth catching, even if the lineups themselves won't blow anyone away. Philadelphia's lefty comes in having authored a strong season—10-5 with a 3.32 ERA and 176 strikeouts—and the peripherals back it up, with an elite xFIP- and mid-90s velocity driving his 10.88 pNERD, comfortably above average for today's slate. Across from him, Prielipp is the far shakier proposition at 3-5 with a 4.79 ERA and 88 strikeouts, but he's young (25) and his results have actually undershot his skill markers, so there's some sneaky upside if he ever gets the results to match the stuff. This is the second meeting between the two teams this season, with Philadelphia leading the series 1-0. Team-wise, neither club is much of a slugfest waiting to happen—Minnesota's shoddy glovework and baserunning drag its tNERD down to 2.89, while Philly's deep bullpen (44 runs above average) and strong Baserunning numbers prop up an otherwise middling offense. At a 13.27 gNERD, this sits above both the historical average and today's average, mostly on the strength of the pitching matchup rather than star-studded lineups.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Philadelphia Phillies (2.92); radio, Philadelphia Phillies (2.69)
Philadelphia Phillies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-37.2 |
7.5% |
8.8 |
-5.3 |
44.0 |
$309.8M |
30.5 |
-16.0 |
2.92 |
2.69 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.07 |
-0.28 |
1.64 |
-0.25 |
0.95 |
1.22 |
1.36 |
-0.98 |
1.03 |
0.64 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.07 |
-0.28 |
1.64 |
-0.25 |
0.95 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.52 |
0.32 |
4.00 |
5.83 |
Minnesota Twins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
16.7 |
8.0% |
-5.9 |
-20.1 |
7.0 |
$122.1M |
28.9 |
-10.0 |
2.30 |
2.06 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.53 |
0.24 |
-1.19 |
-1.05 |
-0.62 |
-0.92 |
-0.06 |
-0.61 |
-0.17 |
-0.69 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.53 |
0.24 |
-1.19 |
-1.05 |
-0.62 |
0.92 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.89 |
Jesús Luzardo, Philadelphia Phillies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
69 |
13.8% |
64.5% |
96.5 mph |
28 |
17.2s |
9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.88 |
1.54 |
0.30 |
1.03 |
-0.17 |
-1.51 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
3.76 |
0.77 |
0.15 |
1.03 |
0.17 |
0.75 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
10.88 |
Connor Prielipp, Minnesota Twins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
96 |
9.8% |
63.8% |
95.4 mph |
25 |
18.2s |
18 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.28 |
-0.35 |
0.02 |
0.53 |
-0.97 |
-0.69 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.55 |
-0.17 |
0.01 |
0.53 |
0.97 |
0.35 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.94 |
Go back to top of page
New York Yankees @ Toronto Blue Jays, 12:07p
Summary
Cam Schlittler brings a legit ace look to Rogers Centre, but the Blue Jays' punchless lineup and the Yankees' cold bats keep this from being appointment viewing. Schlittler's been the story of New York's rotation this year, and his stuff backs it up: he's sitting at 97.9 mph with elite whiff and strike rates, and his last outing was seven innings, giving up one earned run while surrendering three hits against Atlanta. That 10.88 pNERD is comfortably above today's average, and his xFIP- of 68 suggests the shiny ERA is basically earned, not lucky. Across the mound, Braydon Fisher is a modest fifth-starter type — he's making his eighth start of the season, having last pitched out of the bullpen on Thursday, throwing one scoreless inning — and his 3.61 pNERD reflects a fairly ordinary profile. Toronto's offense has been listless, and the Jays' tNERD of 1.97 is near the bottom of today's slate thanks to weak barrel rates and poor baserunning; the Yankees counter with real thump and an 8.09 tNERD. The 12.27 gNERD lands solidly above the historical median, mostly on Schlittler's shoulders — worth tuning in for his start even if the Jays' lineup doesn't give you much reason to stick around late.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
New York Yankees
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
10.7 |
9.6% |
3.9 |
11.5 |
33.8 |
$337.1M |
29.9 |
-13.0 |
2.08 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.35 |
1.87 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
0.52 |
1.54 |
0.85 |
-0.79 |
-0.61 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.35 |
1.87 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.09 |
Toronto Blue Jays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-50.7 |
5.8% |
-5.2 |
24.5 |
32.3 |
$306.1M |
30.1 |
-4.0 |
3.10 |
2.39 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.47 |
-2.02 |
-1.06 |
1.35 |
0.46 |
1.18 |
0.99 |
-0.24 |
1.40 |
0.01 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.47 |
-2.02 |
-1.06 |
1.35 |
0.46 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.97 |
Cam Schlittler, New York Yankees
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
68 |
13.6% |
67.6% |
97.9 mph |
25 |
21.4s |
-14 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.94 |
1.45 |
1.64 |
1.66 |
-0.97 |
1.93 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
3.88 |
0.72 |
0.82 |
1.66 |
0.97 |
-0.96 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
10.88 |
Braydon Fisher, Toronto Blue Jays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
108 |
10.6% |
62.6% |
94.7 mph |
25 |
19.7s |
-22 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.43 |
0.03 |
-0.52 |
0.22 |
-0.97 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.87 |
0.02 |
-0.26 |
0.22 |
0.97 |
-0.27 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.61 |
Go back to top of page
St. Louis Cardinals @ Chicago Cubs, 11:20a
Summary
The Cubs' stellar defense and lineup punch make this more watchable than the modest pitching matchup would suggest, even if neither arm is likely to miss many bats. Chicago sits second in the NL Central at 71-51 and brings by far the better team profile, with the Cubs held second place in the National League Central at 71-51, firmly in the playoff picture, while the Cardinals have quietly won 7-3 in their last 10 despite an offense that grades out well below average. The Cubs' 9.80 tNERD is driven by strong hitting and a defense that ranks near the top of the league, offsetting a shaky bullpen. Matthew Boyd, at 8-1, is the more compelling arm of the two — Chicago starts left-hander Matthew Boyd, who owns an 8-1 record and a 3.50 ERA with 66 strikeouts in 79 2/3 innings — though his peripherals are closer to average than his record suggests. McGreevy, on the other hand, is a pure contact pitcher; he carries a 4-9 record with a 3.64 ERA, but he misses very few bats, striking out just 81 hitters across more than 120 innings, with results that have outrun his peripheral numbers. Both gNERD (11.67) and tNERD gap land near today's middle-to-upper range — worth a look mostly for the Cubs' complete team game.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Chicago Cubs (3.01); radio, Chicago Cubs (3.15)
St. Louis Cardinals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-33.5 |
7.3% |
0.8 |
14.9 |
-2.7 |
$111.2M |
26.9 |
-20.0 |
2.17 |
2.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.96 |
-0.48 |
0.10 |
0.83 |
-1.04 |
-1.05 |
-1.94 |
-1.22 |
-0.43 |
-0.50 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.96 |
-0.48 |
0.10 |
0.83 |
-1.04 |
1.05 |
1.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.45 |
Chicago Cubs
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
65.8 |
7.2% |
4.2 |
58.6 |
-3.5 |
$246.2M |
29.8 |
2.0 |
3.01 |
3.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.98 |
-0.58 |
0.75 |
3.18 |
-1.07 |
0.50 |
0.67 |
0.13 |
1.22 |
1.62 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.98 |
-0.58 |
0.75 |
3.18 |
-1.07 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.13 |
0.61 |
0.81 |
4.00 |
9.80 |
Michael McGreevy, St. Louis Cardinals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
7.5% |
61.8% |
91.4 mph |
25 |
19.6s |
-11 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.04 |
-1.43 |
-0.86 |
-1.26 |
-0.97 |
0.45 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.08 |
-0.72 |
-0.43 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
-0.23 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.48 |
Matthew Boyd, Chicago Cubs
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
99 |
10.5% |
66.2% |
92.7 mph |
35 |
18.8s |
-13 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.10 |
-0.02 |
1.03 |
-0.68 |
1.71 |
-0.20 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.20 |
-0.01 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.61 |
Go back to top of page
Miami Marlins @ Cincinnati Reds, 3:40p
Summary
A modest gNERD score for a game that's more about storylines than star power — the Marlins' playoff push and a Reds offense that hits homers in bunches give this some juice, even if neither starter is likely to dazzle. Miami's tNERD of 8.81 is buoyed by strong baserunning, a young/cheap roster, and positive luck, while Cincinnati's 5.01 is dragged down by weak batting runs but boosted by an above-average barrel rate — Cincinnati has hit 13 home runs during the last 10 games, with 21 extra-base hits over that stretch. On the mound, Ryan Gusto (pNERD 5.21) is still looking for his first win of the season and his first victory with Miami in 18 appearances since being acquired from Houston, though his strike-throwing keeps him watchable. Brady Singer (pNERD 4.23) is quick-working but has scuffled to a 4.66 ERA and 7.5 strikeouts per nine innings this season. Add in that the Marlins remain three games out of the Wild Card with time running out, and this sits a shade above the historical average gNERD — solid background viewing, not appointment television.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Cincinnati Reds (2.09); radio, Cincinnati Reds (2.11)
Miami Marlins
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-2.7 |
6.6% |
5.0 |
7.9 |
29.5 |
$81.5M |
27.4 |
24.0 |
1.79 |
1.66 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.05 |
-1.20 |
0.91 |
0.46 |
0.34 |
-1.39 |
-1.49 |
1.48 |
-1.17 |
-1.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.05 |
-1.20 |
0.91 |
0.46 |
0.34 |
1.39 |
1.49 |
1.48 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.81 |
Cincinnati Reds
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-61.3 |
9.2% |
0.0 |
-3.8 |
1.0 |
$147.4M |
28.0 |
14.0 |
2.09 |
2.11 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.78 |
1.46 |
-0.06 |
-0.17 |
-0.88 |
-0.63 |
-0.94 |
0.86 |
-0.59 |
-0.59 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.78 |
1.46 |
-0.06 |
-0.17 |
-0.88 |
0.63 |
0.94 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.01 |
Ryan Gusto, Miami Marlins
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
9.0% |
67.1% |
93.9 mph |
27 |
19.3s |
13 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.04 |
-0.72 |
1.43 |
-0.14 |
-0.44 |
0.21 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.08 |
-0.36 |
0.71 |
0.00 |
0.44 |
-0.10 |
0.65 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.21 |
Brady Singer, Cincinnati Reds
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
103 |
10.4% |
62.0% |
91.3 mph |
29 |
16.8s |
4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.14 |
-0.06 |
-0.76 |
-1.31 |
0.10 |
-1.83 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.28 |
-0.03 |
-0.38 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.92 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
4.23 |
Go back to top of page
Chicago White Sox @ Detroit Tigers, 10:10a
Summary
I have enough information to write the summary now.
Detroit's Troy Melton is quietly having a strong season, and this AL Central tilt has more bite than the standings suggest, even if Anthony Kay's start is the weak link. The Tigers and White Sox enter having split their season series close, with this the eighth meeting between these teams, and the White Sox holding a 4-3 advantage in the season series, while both clubs sit around .500 and jostling in a crowded Central race. Melton (7.62 pNERD) is the headliner: his velocity, whiff rate, and youth all grade out well, and his xFIP suggests he's better than his surface numbers show. Kay (1.80 pNERD) is the opposite story — below-average strike-throwing and a slow pace drag his score down, so don't expect much crispness from the White Sox side. Chicago's offense actually rates as the more watchable team overall (8.24 tNERD, driven by strong barrel rates and a young, discounted roster), well above Detroit's more middling 4.56, though the Tigers get a boost from a deep injury list up and down the roster including Riley Greene on the 10-day IL with a hamstring injury and Jack Flaherty on the 15-day IL with a flexor issue. Overall, at 11.11 this gNERD sits a touch above the historical average, and roughly average among today's slate — watchable mainly for Melton's arm, not the whole show.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Detroit Tigers (2.74); radio, Detroit Tigers (2.64)
Chicago White Sox
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
21.6 |
8.4% |
-3.9 |
1.3 |
34.7 |
$105.8M |
27.1 |
-24.0 |
1.82 |
2.57 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.67 |
0.65 |
-0.81 |
0.10 |
0.56 |
-1.11 |
-1.76 |
-1.47 |
-1.11 |
0.39 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.67 |
0.65 |
-0.81 |
0.10 |
0.56 |
1.11 |
1.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
4.00 |
8.24 |
Detroit Tigers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
22.2 |
8.6% |
-4.9 |
-10.6 |
11.6 |
$239.2M |
29.6 |
6.0 |
2.74 |
2.64 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.69 |
0.85 |
-1.00 |
-0.54 |
-0.43 |
0.42 |
0.58 |
0.37 |
0.69 |
0.54 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.69 |
0.85 |
-1.00 |
-0.54 |
-0.43 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.34 |
0.27 |
4.00 |
4.56 |
Anthony Kay, Chicago White Sox
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
114 |
10.2% |
61.9% |
95.5 mph |
31 |
20.3s |
-19 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.79 |
-0.16 |
-0.80 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
1.03 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.58 |
-0.08 |
-0.40 |
0.58 |
0.00 |
-0.51 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
1.80 |
Troy Melton, Detroit Tigers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
95 |
12.0% |
64.6% |
96.2 mph |
25 |
17.2s |
-60 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.34 |
0.69 |
0.36 |
0.89 |
-0.97 |
-1.51 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.67 |
0.35 |
0.18 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.75 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.62 |
Go back to top of page
Baltimore Orioles @ Tampa Bay Rays, 3:10p
Summary
Not a marquee matchup, but there's enough contrast here to keep things interesting for a few innings. Tampa Bay's playoff-caliber roster hosts a scuffling Baltimore club, and the gap between the two team's fortunes is the real story.
The Rays enter with a 74-46 record, one of the strongest records in baseball, and have been especially tough at home, turning Tropicana Field into one of the most inhospitable venues in baseball, going 41-19 at home. Baltimore, meanwhile, sits well back in the standings, though the Orioles snapped a recent skid with a win in their last outing, and the season series between these two teams is knotted at 3-3. On the mound, Ian Seymour's 7.00 pNERD (well above the day's 5.81 average) stands out thanks to strong strikeout- and strike-throwing marks, while Kyle Bradish's 3.08 is middling, dragged down by a slow pace and shaky recent command despite a respectable career track record. Rays sluggers Junior Caminero and closer Bryan Baker give Tampa Bay bullpen and power intrigue, while Baltimore counters with Gunnar Henderson and Pete Alonso. Overall gNERD of 10.37 is right around league average — watchable, not essential.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, Baltimore Orioles (2.10)
Baltimore Orioles
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
18.5 |
8.7% |
-3.8 |
-11.7 |
29.5 |
$214.8M |
29.0 |
-3.0 |
2.82 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.58 |
0.95 |
-0.79 |
-0.60 |
0.34 |
0.14 |
-0.02 |
-0.18 |
0.85 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.58 |
0.95 |
-0.79 |
-0.60 |
0.34 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.42 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
4.93 |
Tampa Bay Rays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
34.9 |
5.8% |
5.4 |
-6.7 |
18.7 |
$106.9M |
29.1 |
17.0 |
2.27 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.07 |
-2.02 |
0.98 |
-0.33 |
-0.12 |
-1.10 |
0.07 |
1.05 |
-0.23 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.07 |
-2.02 |
0.98 |
-0.33 |
-0.12 |
1.10 |
0.00 |
1.05 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.72 |
Kyle Bradish, Baltimore Orioles
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
95 |
10.6% |
61.7% |
94.5 mph |
29 |
21.7s |
-5 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.34 |
0.03 |
-0.90 |
0.13 |
0.10 |
2.17 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.67 |
0.02 |
-0.45 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
-1.09 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.08 |
Ian Seymour, Tampa Bay Rays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
91 |
13.1% |
66.6% |
91.0 mph |
27 |
18.8s |
6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.57 |
1.21 |
1.22 |
-1.44 |
-0.44 |
-0.20 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.15 |
0.61 |
0.61 |
0.00 |
0.44 |
0.10 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.00 |
Go back to top of page
Seattle Mariners @ Houston Astros, 4:10p
Summary
A lopsided season series meets a middling watchability score—entertaining subplot, unspectacular baseball. The Astros hold the AL West lead, but Seattle has taken seven of the first eight meetings between these clubs this season, and Houston knows it—a nice underdog wrinkle given Seattle sits six games back in the division with a 2-8 record over its last ten. That tension aside, the gNERD of 8.70 sits below the historical average (10.11) and well under today's slate average (11.38), so temper expectations. Both offenses are mediocre by NERD's reckoning—Houston's tNERD (3.49) edges Seattle's (3.10), with the Astros' solid batting runs undercut by shaky baserunning and fielding, while Seattle's own porous defense drags its number down further, only partly offset by some positive early-season luck suggesting mild upside. The pitching matchup is uneven: Emerson Hancock brings a respectable 5.81 pNERD, built on a strong xFIP- and above-average velocity, while Hayden Wesneski carries a 0.00 pNERD simply because there's no meaningful statistical profile on file—treat him as an unknown quantity rather than a known dud.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Seattle Mariners (2.35); radio, Seattle Mariners (2.52)
Seattle Mariners
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-3.0 |
7.7% |
-4.4 |
-29.5 |
19.3 |
$196.7M |
28.4 |
17.0 |
2.35 |
2.52 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.05 |
-0.07 |
-0.90 |
-1.55 |
-0.10 |
-0.07 |
-0.52 |
1.05 |
-0.07 |
0.28 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.05 |
-0.07 |
-0.90 |
-1.55 |
-0.10 |
0.07 |
0.52 |
1.05 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
4.00 |
3.10 |
Houston Astros
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
28.1 |
8.0% |
-6.2 |
-8.2 |
19.1 |
$232.7M |
28.9 |
-2.0 |
2.17 |
1.99 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.87 |
0.24 |
-1.25 |
-0.41 |
-0.11 |
0.34 |
-0.16 |
-0.12 |
-0.42 |
-0.84 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.87 |
0.24 |
-1.25 |
-0.41 |
-0.11 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.49 |
Emerson Hancock, Seattle Mariners
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
94 |
10.6% |
64.8% |
95.2 mph |
27 |
18.8s |
-8 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.40 |
0.03 |
0.44 |
0.44 |
-0.44 |
-0.20 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.79 |
0.02 |
0.22 |
0.44 |
0.44 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.81 |
Hayden Wesneski, Houston Astros
No detailed stats available
Go back to top of page
Texas Rangers @ Athletics, 6:40p
Summary
The Rangers-Athletics series has more juice than the standings suggest, but this particular installment lands below-average on the watchability scale. The Athletics have lost 12 of their last 15 games, and Friday's 8-3 loss to Texas — keyed by Jeff McNeil's four-hit night — kept that skid mostly intact heading into this one. Texas's offense, meanwhile, has been stuck in what's been called a prolonged slump, which doesn't inspire confidence even against a shaky Oakland pitching staff. Gore brings the swing-and-miss stuff (a healthy SwStr% and a 95-plus mph fastball) that gives him the better pNERD of the two starters, and his luck score suggests he's actually underperformed his skills a bit, so some positive regression is plausible. Ginn has quietly been Oakland's most stable arm, but his below-average strike-throwing drags his NERD components down. Team-wise, Texas's respectable bullpen and Oakland's brutal fielding and baserunning numbers create a lopsided gNERD of 8.60 — below both the historical average and today's slate average — making this one more skippable than must-see.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Texas Rangers (2.01); radio, Texas Rangers (2.08)
Texas Rangers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
5.9 |
7.3% |
-1.5 |
-9.3 |
28.1 |
$201.9M |
30.3 |
31.0 |
2.01 |
2.08 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.21 |
-0.48 |
-0.34 |
-0.47 |
0.28 |
-0.01 |
1.17 |
1.91 |
-0.74 |
-0.65 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.21 |
-0.48 |
-0.34 |
-0.47 |
0.28 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
1.91 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.11 |
Athletics
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-8.1 |
7.7% |
-4.5 |
-30.5 |
-7.8 |
$135.2M |
28.2 |
14.0 |
1.27 |
1.94 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.21 |
-0.07 |
-0.92 |
-1.61 |
-1.25 |
-0.77 |
-0.71 |
0.86 |
-2.19 |
-0.95 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.21 |
-0.07 |
-0.92 |
-1.61 |
-1.25 |
0.77 |
0.71 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.28 |
MacKenzie Gore, Texas Rangers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
91 |
12.0% |
63.9% |
95.4 mph |
27 |
19.8s |
17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.57 |
0.69 |
0.06 |
0.53 |
-0.44 |
0.62 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.15 |
0.35 |
0.03 |
0.53 |
0.44 |
-0.31 |
0.85 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
6.84 |
J.T. Ginn, Athletics
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
104 |
11.5% |
60.9% |
93.5 mph |
27 |
20.2s |
-24 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.20 |
0.46 |
-1.25 |
-0.32 |
-0.44 |
0.95 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.39 |
0.23 |
-0.63 |
0.00 |
0.44 |
-0.47 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.97 |
Go back to top of page
Arizona Diamondbacks @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
A middling gNERD score matches a middling vibe: this is a solid NL contender clash but not a must-watch by the numbers. At 8.59, tonight's gNERD sits well below the historic average of 10.11 and well under today's slate average of 11.38, so temper expectations.
The Braves, enter with a 73-48 record, one of the National League's strongest teams, and are favored at -182, with the Diamondbacks priced at +150. Atlanta's offense runs through Matt Olson and Ozzie Albies, while Drake Baldwin has been a quiet force behind the plate, hitting .274 with 20 home runs and 61 RBI. Arizona counters with a scrappy profile — a dangerous underdog because of its elite defense, 208 doubles — which lines up with the Diamondbacks' strong baserunning and fielding z-scores.
On the mound, neither Eduardo Rodriguez nor Grant Holmes grades out as a difference-maker by the underlying peripherals, with modest xFIP- and strikeout rates producing pNERD scores barely above league-average (3.03 and 3.37). Both teams are running notably unlucky per their tNERD components, especially Atlanta, so positive regression could be brewing, but tonight's watchability leans more on playoff stakes than must-see stuff on the mound.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Atlanta Braves (2.36); radio, Atlanta Braves (2.36)
Arizona Diamondbacks
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-26.0 |
7.0% |
6.4 |
20.4 |
28.5 |
$231.6M |
30.2 |
-15.0 |
2.19 |
1.92 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.73 |
-0.79 |
1.18 |
1.13 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
1.08 |
-0.92 |
-0.39 |
-0.99 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.73 |
-0.79 |
1.18 |
1.13 |
0.29 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.07 |
Atlanta Braves
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
0.5 |
8.9% |
-2.8 |
6.4 |
38.3 |
$249.8M |
30.5 |
-37.0 |
2.36 |
2.36 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.05 |
1.16 |
-0.59 |
0.37 |
0.71 |
0.54 |
1.36 |
-2.27 |
-0.05 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.05 |
1.16 |
-0.59 |
0.37 |
0.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.70 |
Eduardo Rodriguez, Arizona Diamondbacks
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
105 |
8.7% |
63.4% |
92.0 mph |
33 |
18.4s |
-41 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.26 |
-0.87 |
-0.17 |
-0.99 |
1.17 |
-0.53 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.51 |
-0.43 |
-0.08 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.03 |
Grant Holmes, Atlanta Braves
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
107 |
12.0% |
63.0% |
93.9 mph |
30 |
18.7s |
-24 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.38 |
0.69 |
-0.32 |
-0.14 |
0.37 |
-0.28 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.75 |
0.35 |
-0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.37 |
Go back to top of page
Kansas City Royals @ Los Angeles Angels, 6:38p
Summary
Two last-place clubs playing out the string, but there's a real reason to peek in: Bobby Witt Jr. is still must-watch even on a lousy Royals team, and Reid Detmers has quietly turned into the Angels' best reason to tune in this season. This is a low-stakes, low-shine matchup between two teams comfortably out of the race, saved mostly by one big name and one intriguing arm. Kansas City's road struggles are brutal — Kansas City brings a road record of 21-43, the kind of number that demands explanation — and the Royals are further thinned out with Salvador Perez's day-to-day elbow issue that has kept him out of lineups and the absences of Maikel Garcia and Vinnie Pasquantino on the IL. Still, Bobby Witt Jr. remains the engine of this offense — 116 hits, 32 stolen bases, 62 runs — and when he gets going, the Royals can beat anyone. On the mound, Detmers' 7.29 pNERD is the clear draw, built on a strong xFIP- and a healthy swinging-strike rate, while Randy Dobnak's soft-tossing, poor-strikeout profile checks in well below average. Both team tNERDs sit near the bottom of the scale, and the overall gNERD of 6.76 lands below today's average — watch for Witt and Detmers, skip the rest.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Angels (2.59); radio, Kansas City Royals (2.22)
Kansas City Royals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-28.3 |
7.9% |
2.3 |
4.0 |
-38.6 |
$184.5M |
29.7 |
13.0 |
2.11 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.80 |
0.13 |
0.39 |
0.25 |
-2.57 |
-0.21 |
0.62 |
0.80 |
-0.54 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.80 |
0.13 |
0.39 |
0.25 |
-2.57 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.41 |
Los Angeles Angels
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-36.6 |
8.0% |
-6.5 |
-28.5 |
21.6 |
$191.6M |
28.6 |
0.0 |
2.59 |
2.01 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.05 |
0.24 |
-1.31 |
-1.50 |
-0.00 |
-0.13 |
-0.39 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
-0.80 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.05 |
0.24 |
-1.31 |
-1.50 |
-0.00 |
0.13 |
0.39 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.09 |
Randy Dobnak, Kansas City Royals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
109 |
7.5% |
62.5% |
91.8 mph |
31 |
16.8s |
-62 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.49 |
-1.43 |
-0.55 |
-1.08 |
0.63 |
-1.83 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.99 |
-0.72 |
-0.28 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.92 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.74 |
Reid Detmers, Los Angeles Angels
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
87 |
12.6% |
65.2% |
94.1 mph |
26 |
19.1s |
8 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.81 |
0.98 |
0.59 |
-0.05 |
-0.71 |
0.05 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.62 |
0.49 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
-0.02 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.29 |
Go back to top of page
Colorado Rockies @ San Francisco Giants, 1:05p
Summary
Two last-place NL West clubs playing out the string, with Logan Webb as the lone reason to tune in. Both the Rockies and Giants are buried near the bottom of the division, and the standings tell the story here: San Francisco enters the matchup at 50-71, while Colorado is 48-73. The Giants get a boost from a strong recent Webb outing — he gave up one earned run and allowed four hits in eight innings pitched against the Detroit Tigers on Sunday — and his solid xFIP- of 89 backs up that eye test, making him comfortably the best thing on the mound today. Lorenzen, by contrast, has been a steady disappointment; he is 3-10 with a 6.83 ERA and 81 strikeouts in 112 2/3 innings pitched, and his peripherals (weak swinging-strike and strike rates) mostly back up that ugly line, though positive luck suggests some slight regression toward respectability is fair to expect. Both offenses are middling-to-poor, and neither bullpen stands out. With a gNERD of 6.54 — below both the historical and today's averages — this is a game for Webb completionists only, not casual viewers.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
Colorado Rockies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-49.1 |
6.7% |
-1.4 |
-14.0 |
25.3 |
$134.1M |
29.5 |
2.0 |
1.73 |
1.80 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.42 |
-1.10 |
-0.33 |
-0.72 |
0.16 |
-0.79 |
0.44 |
0.13 |
-1.29 |
-1.25 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.42 |
-1.10 |
-0.33 |
-0.72 |
0.16 |
0.79 |
0.00 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
1.51 |
San Francisco Giants
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-16.5 |
7.2% |
-4.8 |
-9.8 |
2.9 |
$228.3M |
29.6 |
24.0 |
3.20 |
3.49 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.45 |
-0.58 |
-0.98 |
-0.50 |
-0.80 |
0.29 |
0.49 |
1.48 |
1.59 |
2.34 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.45 |
-0.58 |
-0.98 |
-0.50 |
-0.80 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.48 |
0.79 |
1.17 |
4.00 |
4.13 |
Michael Lorenzen, Colorado Rockies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
115 |
7.7% |
61.6% |
93.7 mph |
34 |
18.6s |
29 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.85 |
-1.34 |
-0.94 |
-0.23 |
1.44 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.70 |
-0.67 |
-0.47 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.18 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
2.14 |
Logan Webb, San Francisco Giants
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
89 |
8.8% |
65.5% |
92.2 mph |
29 |
18.7s |
-1 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.69 |
-0.82 |
0.75 |
-0.90 |
0.10 |
-0.28 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
1.38 |
-0.41 |
0.37 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.29 |
Go back to top of page