MLB: What to watch on August 27, 2026
Here are today's MLB games, ordered by watchability, based on how interesting the teams and starting pitchers look. Higher is better. For more information, read this post.
Notes:
- Pitcher 'no data': Pitchers only have a pNERD score once they've started at least one game and have at least 20 innings pitched. I also show 'no data' when I can't correctly link a starting pitcher with their stats.
- Generated by the mlb-watchability project on GitHub.
Detail
Milwaukee Brewers @ New York Mets, 4:10p
Summary
Jacob Misiorowski is essentially a top-of-the-line watchability lock, and this Brewers-Mets series finale delivers plenty else besides. Misiorowski, in his sophomore season, has been electric, leading MLB in ERA (1.68), strikeouts, and WHIP, and his 100+ mph heat produces the kind of swing-and-miss stuff (elite SwStr%, absurd xFIP-) that fuels his 15.57 pNERD, one of the best you'll see all year. He's opposed by Sean Manaea, a serviceable but unspectacular lefty (4.31 ERA, 4-5) who's been homer-prone this year; his 5.60 pNERD is fine but nowhere near Misiorowski's level. The Brewers own the majors' best record and bring a well-rounded 9.92 tNERD built on baserunning, bullpen depth, and a young roster, while the Mets counter with a middling 5.47 mark, held down by shaky batting and baserunning but boosted by broadcast appeal. Milwaukee already took the series opener 8-1 behind Brice Turang and Sal Frelick, and the finale caps a series that's had playoff-atmosphere intensity despite the Mets' fade from contention. With an 18.28 gNERD score, this ranks near the very top of today's slate and comfortably above the historical average, making it the easy pick if you can only watch one game.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, New York Mets (3.32); radio, New York Mets (3.05)
Milwaukee Brewers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
30.7 |
7.4% |
8.7 |
-0.2 |
57.8 |
$139.3M |
27.7 |
-19.0 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.96 |
-0.31 |
1.57 |
-0.02 |
1.34 |
-0.73 |
-1.21 |
-1.04 |
0.53 |
0.37 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.96 |
-0.31 |
1.57 |
-0.02 |
1.34 |
0.73 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
0.27 |
0.18 |
4.00 |
9.92 |
New York Mets
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-32.2 |
8.6% |
-5.1 |
-1.2 |
41.7 |
$374.9M |
29.9 |
4.0 |
3.32 |
3.05 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.91 |
0.96 |
-1.02 |
-0.07 |
0.68 |
1.97 |
0.85 |
0.22 |
1.82 |
1.41 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.91 |
0.96 |
-1.02 |
-0.07 |
0.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.22 |
0.91 |
0.70 |
4.00 |
5.47 |
Jacob Misiorowski, Milwaukee Brewers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
50 |
17.9% |
68.1% |
100.7 mph |
24 |
19.6s |
-9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-3.06 |
3.47 |
1.78 |
2.91 |
-1.24 |
0.44 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
6.12 |
1.73 |
0.89 |
2.00 |
1.24 |
-0.22 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
15.57 |
Sean Manaea, New York Mets
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
100 |
10.6% |
66.3% |
91.0 mph |
34 |
17.0s |
6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.07 |
0.03 |
1.04 |
-1.44 |
1.43 |
-1.68 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.13 |
0.01 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.84 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.60 |
Go back to top of page
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Atlanta Braves, 4:15p
Summary
Both aces looking sharp, both teams fighting for their divisions, and a series that's already delivered two walk-off-flavored nail-biters — this one has the highest gNERD score of the day and it earns it. Yamamoto and Sale rank second and third in the NL in ERA, and Sale carries a pNERD of 10.05 thanks to elite peripherals — a sparkling xFIP- of 65 and strikeout stuff to match. Yamamoto isn't far behind at 7.97, riding a stretch where he's posted a 2.08 ERA while striking out 27 batters across 26 innings in four August starts, and he's dominated Atlanta specifically, with their past two encounters totaling 10 scoreless innings. This is Dodgers-Braves as a legitimate playoff preview: "an August series that has felt more like October baseball," with the Braves already having won the first two games in dramatic fashion, including a walk-off single from seldom-used Ha-Seong Kim. The Dodgers bring the majors' most star-studded, highest-payroll lineup (tNERD 8.26) against a scrappy, barrel-happy Braves offense (tNERD 5.60) that's been unlucky by the numbers and due for better results. With two frontline arms and postseason stakes attached, this is as close to appointment viewing as the day offers.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.45); radio, Los Angeles Dodgers (2.51)
Los Angeles Dodgers
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
65.1 |
8.5% |
-2.6 |
12.9 |
44.2 |
$413.5M |
30.0 |
7.0 |
2.45 |
2.51 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.99 |
0.85 |
-0.55 |
0.62 |
0.78 |
2.41 |
0.90 |
0.38 |
0.12 |
0.26 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.99 |
0.85 |
-0.55 |
0.62 |
0.78 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.38 |
0.06 |
0.13 |
4.00 |
8.26 |
Atlanta Braves
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-5.8 |
8.6% |
-1.2 |
6.9 |
43.0 |
$249.8M |
30.5 |
-32.0 |
2.36 |
2.36 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.12 |
0.96 |
-0.29 |
0.33 |
0.73 |
0.54 |
1.36 |
-1.75 |
-0.05 |
-0.06 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.12 |
0.96 |
-0.29 |
0.33 |
0.73 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.60 |
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Los Angeles Dodgers
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
80 |
11.2% |
65.8% |
95.9 mph |
27 |
19.4s |
-17 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.26 |
0.31 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
-0.44 |
0.27 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.53 |
0.16 |
0.42 |
0.76 |
0.44 |
-0.14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.97 |
Chris Sale, Atlanta Braves
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
65 |
13.7% |
68.0% |
96.0 mph |
37 |
20.3s |
-12 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-2.16 |
1.49 |
1.76 |
0.80 |
2.23 |
1.01 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
4.32 |
0.74 |
0.88 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
-0.50 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
10.05 |
Go back to top of page
Baltimore Orioles @ St. Louis Cardinals, 11:15a
Summary
A lopsided pitching matchup wrapped around a series-sweep bid makes this one worth a peek if you like watching one team's plan completely unravel. Trevor Rogers takes the ball for Baltimore riding a hot stretch — he's gone 7-2 with a 2.57 ERA in 14 starts since the start of June, with nine quality starts in that span and only one outing allowing more than three earned runs. His command-over-stuff profile (strong strike rate, modest whiff numbers) checks out with a solid 5.59 pNERD. On the other side, St. Louis is essentially punting the day: the Cardinals are going with a bullpen game, with Gordon Graceffo making his first start of the season and just the second of his career before handing things to relief, meaning his 0.00 pNERD isn't a knock, it's just a lack of a real track record as a starter. The Orioles' offense has been rolling too, having scored 21 runs in the first two games of the series. Team NERDs are middling-to-decent on both sides, with the Cardinals' young, cheap roster and shaky bullpen offsetting Baltimore's barrel-rate pop — solid, not spectacular, gNERD sitting a touch above the historical average.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Baltimore Orioles (2.82); radio, St. Louis Cardinals (2.15)
Baltimore Orioles
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
21.7 |
8.7% |
-1.2 |
-6.1 |
39.1 |
$214.8M |
29.0 |
-10.0 |
2.82 |
2.10 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.69 |
1.06 |
-0.29 |
-0.31 |
0.57 |
0.14 |
-0.02 |
-0.55 |
0.85 |
-0.61 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.69 |
1.06 |
-0.29 |
-0.31 |
0.57 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.42 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
6.17 |
St. Louis Cardinals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-28.5 |
7.6% |
0.8 |
16.0 |
-0.5 |
$111.2M |
26.9 |
-23.0 |
2.17 |
2.15 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.80 |
-0.10 |
0.09 |
0.77 |
-1.04 |
-1.05 |
-1.94 |
-1.26 |
-0.43 |
-0.50 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.80 |
-0.10 |
0.09 |
0.77 |
-1.04 |
1.05 |
1.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.91 |
Trevor Rogers, Baltimore Orioles
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
101 |
11.2% |
68.5% |
93.7 mph |
28 |
17.9s |
0 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.01 |
0.31 |
1.96 |
-0.23 |
-0.17 |
-0.94 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.01 |
0.16 |
0.98 |
0.00 |
0.17 |
0.47 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.59 |
Gordon Graceffo, St. Louis Cardinals
No detailed stats available
Go back to top of page
Houston Astros @ New York Yankees, 4:05p
Summary
Cole in a rubber match against his old team, with the Yankees clinging to a wild-card spot and Houston fighting to stay above .500 — this one has more juice than the raw numbers alone suggest. Cole, at 35, remains one of the game's steadiest forces: he's pitched to a 3.17 xFIP over his last five starts while allowing just a 2.5% barrel rate, and he's held opponents to two barrels over his past 30.2 innings, making it difficult to generate any quick-strike offense. His 96.8 mph average velocity and strong strike-throwing underpin a well-earned 7.73 pNERD, comfortably above the day's average. Wesneski, by contrast, is more modest — his 3.78 pNERD reflects a pitcher who turned in his best start of the season last time out, five shutout innings against Oakland, but he's largely avoided the kind of lineup he'll face here. The Yankees' 7.78 tNERD, fueled by strong barrel and baserunning numbers, dwarfs Houston's punchless 2.83 mark — the Astros' offense has actually been a well below-average unit lately against right-handers. Combine an ace-caliber Cole outing with the Bronx backdrop, and this one's worth a look even if the final gNERD (11.06) sits right around the historical middle.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Houston Astros (2.17); radio, New York Yankees (2.22)
Houston Astros
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
22.7 |
7.9% |
-7.1 |
-12.3 |
18.8 |
$232.7M |
28.9 |
-5.0 |
2.17 |
1.99 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.72 |
0.22 |
-1.40 |
-0.61 |
-0.25 |
0.34 |
-0.16 |
-0.27 |
-0.42 |
-0.84 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.72 |
0.22 |
-1.40 |
-0.61 |
-0.25 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.83 |
New York Yankees
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
5.9 |
9.5% |
4.9 |
4.0 |
39.8 |
$337.1M |
29.9 |
-17.0 |
2.08 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.22 |
1.91 |
0.86 |
0.18 |
0.60 |
1.54 |
0.85 |
-0.93 |
-0.61 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
0.22 |
1.91 |
0.86 |
0.18 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
7.78 |
Hayden Wesneski, Houston Astros
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
108 |
12.8% |
64.2% |
93.5 mph |
28 |
19.0s |
-6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.41 |
1.07 |
0.15 |
-0.32 |
-0.17 |
-0.05 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.83 |
0.53 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
0.17 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.78 |
Gerrit Cole, New York Yankees
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
84 |
10.1% |
68.2% |
96.8 mph |
35 |
19.3s |
-9 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.02 |
-0.21 |
1.83 |
1.16 |
1.70 |
0.19 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
2.05 |
-0.10 |
0.91 |
1.16 |
0.00 |
-0.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
7.73 |
Go back to top of page
Arizona Diamondbacks @ San Francisco Giants, 6:45p
Summary
Good enough info to write the summary now.
A middling matchup on paper, livened up by a playoff-hungry Arizona team trying to keep its foot on the gas against a Giants squad with nothing to lose but a real chip on its shoulder. The Diamondbacks arrive winners of five of seven and have throttled San Francisco this year, taking eight of nine meetings, while the Giants are fresh off a series win over the Reds — their first series victory since late July — and would love nothing more than to play spoiler. On the mound, Arizona rolls out rookie Jose Cabrera, recalled for a spot start with an unremarkable line so far 0-2 with a 5.60 ERA and 12 strikeouts in 17 2/3 innings, last seen going 4 1/3 innings against San Diego; no pNERD data exists for him yet, so treat him as a wildcard. Landen Roupp is the more interesting arm, carrying a decent 97 xFIP- and solid strikeout rate, though he's looking to rebound from his current five-start losing skid. Neither team's tNERD impresses — both sit below average, weighed down by shaky Giants baserunning and fielding — so this lands as a below-average watchability day, roughly a 9.99 gNERD against a season mean near 10.8, not urgent viewing unless the division rivalry itself draws you in.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, San Francisco Giants (3.20); radio, San Francisco Giants (3.49)
Arizona Diamondbacks
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-20.0 |
7.1% |
8.2 |
24.6 |
23.1 |
$231.6M |
30.2 |
-16.0 |
2.19 |
1.92 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.55 |
-0.63 |
1.48 |
1.19 |
-0.08 |
0.33 |
1.08 |
-0.87 |
-0.39 |
-0.99 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.55 |
-0.63 |
1.48 |
1.19 |
-0.08 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
5.41 |
San Francisco Giants
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-11.7 |
7.5% |
-5.8 |
-11.7 |
6.0 |
$228.3M |
29.6 |
28.0 |
3.20 |
3.49 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.30 |
-0.21 |
-1.15 |
-0.58 |
-0.77 |
0.29 |
0.49 |
1.53 |
1.59 |
2.34 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.30 |
-0.21 |
-1.15 |
-0.58 |
-0.77 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.53 |
0.79 |
1.17 |
4.00 |
4.47 |
Jose Cabrera, Arizona Diamondbacks
No detailed stats available
Landen Roupp, San Francisco Giants
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
97 |
10.0% |
60.3% |
93.3 mph |
27 |
17.3s |
10 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.25 |
-0.25 |
-1.47 |
-0.41 |
-0.44 |
-1.43 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.49 |
-0.13 |
-0.73 |
0.00 |
0.44 |
0.72 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.09 |
Go back to top of page
Colorado Rockies @ Washington Nationals, 10:05a
Summary
This one's a slugfest disguised as a pitching matchup, and the pitching won't get in the way. The Rockies own the majors' worst record but have somehow won two straight in this series, while Washington limps in just 2-10 over their last dozen games after getting throttled 13-1 last night. Neither starter inspires much confidence: Gabriel Hughes carries an ugly road split with a 5.10 xFIP on the road compared to a 3.66 xFIP at home, while Jake Irvin has cratered in the second half, posting a 5.55 xFIP, a full run above his first-half mark of 4.19. Fittingly, the ball has been flying all over the field in this series, with the teams averaging 11.3 runs over the first three games — so bring your over/under ticket. The gNERD here (9.09) sits below the historic median and well under today's slate average, dragged down by Colorado's dreadful tNERD (0.96, thanks to bottom-tier batting and barrel rates) even as Washington's offense and baserunning keep their side respectable. Worth a look for chaos, not craft.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Washington Nationals (2.00); radio, Washington Nationals (2.20)
Colorado Rockies
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-49.4 |
6.5% |
-1.7 |
-17.5 |
27.8 |
$134.1M |
29.5 |
-2.0 |
1.73 |
1.80 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.42 |
-1.27 |
-0.38 |
-0.87 |
0.11 |
-0.79 |
0.44 |
-0.11 |
-1.29 |
-1.25 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.42 |
-1.27 |
-0.38 |
-0.87 |
0.11 |
0.79 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
0.96 |
Washington Nationals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
34.8 |
9.0% |
10.0 |
-6.6 |
-26.5 |
$114.5M |
27.1 |
-29.0 |
2.00 |
2.20 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.08 |
1.38 |
1.82 |
-0.33 |
-2.10 |
-1.01 |
-1.71 |
-1.58 |
-0.75 |
-0.40 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
1.08 |
1.38 |
1.82 |
-0.33 |
-2.10 |
1.01 |
1.71 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
8.58 |
Gabriel Hughes, Colorado Rockies
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
103 |
7.4% |
64.7% |
92.4 mph |
24 |
19.5s |
36 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.11 |
-1.48 |
0.37 |
-0.81 |
-1.24 |
0.36 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-0.23 |
-0.74 |
0.18 |
0.00 |
1.24 |
-0.18 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.09 |
Jake Irvin, Washington Nationals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
111 |
9.8% |
63.3% |
92.7 mph |
29 |
18.5s |
26 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
0.59 |
-0.35 |
-0.22 |
-0.67 |
0.09 |
-0.46 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-1.18 |
-0.17 |
-0.11 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.23 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
3.56 |
Go back to top of page
Kansas City Royals @ Toronto Blue Jays, 4:07p
Summary
A mid-tier watchability score today, propped up almost entirely by one pitcher's recent hot streak against a Toronto lineup that can't hit water falling out of a boat. Noah Cameron enters with real buzz — he's held opponents scoreless in four of his last six starts and posted a 1.63 ERA in the month of August, and his pNERD of 5.45 (helped by youth and a slow, deliberate pace) reflects a pitcher trending well beyond his peripheral numbers. Across the mound, Spencer Arrighetti is making just his second outing since being acquired from Houston at the deadline, and the early returns aren't pretty — his pNERD sits at a paltry 0.61, dragged down by a bloated xFIP- and shaky command. Both teams' tNERDs are unremarkable, with Kansas City's bullpen (a brutal -2.47 component) and Toronto's barrel-rate/batting woes (-2.01 and -1.30) canceling out any offensive intrigue; Toronto's offense has struggled badly, averaging only 3.94 runs per game, which ranks 30th in MLB. The Royals arrive having just snapped a nine-game winning streak, and Kansas City has some positive-luck upside worth noting, but this is a game whose gNERD of 6.19 sits below today's 11.70 average — watch it for Cameron, not for much else.
(A model from Anthropic generated the above text using instructions, the NERD scores, and these sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.)
Recommended broadcasts: TV, Toronto Blue Jays (3.10); radio, Toronto Blue Jays (2.39)
Kansas City Royals
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-19.3 |
7.9% |
3.0 |
16.0 |
-35.7 |
$184.5M |
29.7 |
14.0 |
2.11 |
2.22 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.53 |
0.22 |
0.50 |
0.77 |
-2.47 |
-0.21 |
0.62 |
0.76 |
-0.54 |
-0.36 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-0.53 |
0.22 |
0.50 |
0.77 |
-2.47 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
3.46 |
Toronto Blue Jays
|
Batting |
Barrel% |
BaseR |
Fielding |
Bullpen |
Payroll |
Age |
Luck |
TV |
Radio |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
-45.3 |
5.8% |
-3.3 |
30.8 |
36.1 |
$306.1M |
30.1 |
4.0 |
3.10 |
2.39 |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-1.30 |
-2.01 |
-0.68 |
1.49 |
0.45 |
1.18 |
0.99 |
0.22 |
1.40 |
0.01 |
— |
— |
| tNERD |
-1.30 |
-2.01 |
-0.68 |
1.49 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.22 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
2.87 |
Noah Cameron, Kansas City Royals
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
98 |
11.2% |
62.7% |
92.4 mph |
26 |
17.5s |
-4 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
-0.19 |
0.31 |
-0.45 |
-0.81 |
-0.71 |
-1.27 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
0.37 |
0.16 |
-0.22 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
0.63 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
5.45 |
Spencer Arrighetti, Toronto Blue Jays
|
xFIP- |
SwStr% |
Strike% |
Velocity |
Age |
Pace |
Luck |
KN% |
C |
Total |
| Raw stat |
120 |
9.8% |
59.6% |
92.4 mph |
26 |
20.5s |
-6 |
0.0% |
— |
— |
| Z-score |
1.13 |
-0.35 |
-1.75 |
-0.81 |
-0.71 |
1.17 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| pNERD |
-2.26 |
-0.17 |
-0.88 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
-0.58 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
0.61 |
Go back to top of page